|
 Asking about firearm access is an issue of health - just like asking
about car seats, alcohol use, sexual behavior, and smoking,”
coauthor Dr. Megan L. Ranney from Brown University, Providence,
Rhode Island told Reuters Health by email.
While the risk of firearm-related homicide is highest among young
African American men, most gun-related deaths in the U.S. result
from suicide, for which older white men are at highest risk.
Doctors try to prevent health problems, but they are not great at
firearm-related injury prevention. They usually don’t ask about guns
in the house, and they counsel poorly, if at all, about gun safety,
Ranney and her colleagues write.
They urge physicians to initiate conversations about firearm safety,
and they point out that no federal or state laws forbid those
conversations when they are relevant to a patient’s health.
Only Florida has a gag law concerning the discussion of firearms and
what goes in the medical record, but that law is widely viewed as
interfering with the doctor-patient relationship.
Ranney and colleagues describe three settings where those
conversations are especially important: when there is an immediate
risk that patients will hurt themselves or somebody else; when there
are risk factors for violence in the home (domestic abuse, drug
abuse, serious mental illness, and so on); and when patients belong
to a group at high risk for violence to themselves or somebody else
and when there are children or adolescents in the home.
In a related essay, Dr. Erik A. Wallace from the University of
Colorado School of Medicine in Colorado Springs says he thought
about buying a firearm after a patient threatened to kill him, but
he ultimately decided against arming himself.
He told Reuters Health, “When you own a firearm for protection, you
feel that you need to have easy access to a loaded firearm at a
moment’s notice. Many people believe that the benefit of owning a
firearm for protection outweighs the risk. However, a firearm that
is loaded and accessible caries a risk for injury or death, with
suicide being the greatest risk by far.”
[to top of second column] |
“We need to decide as a society what the appropriate balance is
between protecting our individual freedoms and society as a whole,”
Wallace said. “As we make changes to protect society, we must
sacrifice our individual freedoms. As we make changes to protect our
individual rights, then there is a greater cost to society. Given
the public health crisis of gun violence, we as a society need to
decide how many deaths each year are acceptable. I believe the
number of firearm-related injuries and deaths we see today far
exceed what our society should be comfortable with.”
Dr. Steven E. Weinberger, CEO of the American College of Physicians
(ACP), based in Philadelphia, told Reuters Health by email, “ACP's
formal policy encourages physicians to discuss with patients the
risks associated with having a firearm in the home. Our policy also
speaks out strongly against legislative attempts to prohibit
physicians from discussing firearms and associated risks,
particularly when there are individuals in the home who are at
increased risk of harming themselves or others.”
“Physicians need to consider gun safety and reduction of
firearms-related violence as an important public health issue, one
which they have a responsibility to address with patients,” he said.
“This includes assessing risk and recommending ways to mitigate the
risk of injury or death.”
SOURCE: http://bit.ly/1i46lF7 Annals of Internal Medicine, online
May 16, 2016.
[© 2016 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2016 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
 |
