Patriots back Tom Brady in 'Deflategate' court appeal
Send a link to a friend
[May 26, 2016]
By Nate Raymond
NEW YORK (Reuters) - The New England
Patriots on Wednesday urged a U.S. appeals court to reconsider its
decision to reinstate Tom Brady's "Deflategate" four-game
suspension, saying its star quarterback faced "unprecedented,
unjustified and unsupported penalties."
The Patriots, in court papers, backed an appeal by Brady and
National Football league players union of last month's ruling by the
2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New York, saying it would be
"severely adversely affected" by the loss of its marquee player.
"The Patriots have a keen interest in making sure that Mr. Brady is
not unjustly punished through a fundamentally unfair process," the
team's lawyers wrote.
The Patriots also said they "strongly believe that nobody tampered
with the footballs" used in the team's 45-7 win over the
Indianapolis Colts in January 2015's AFC championship game, the
alleged scheme that led to the NFL's suspension of Brady.
The victory propelled the Patriots to the Super Bowl, where they
beat the Seattle Seahawks, giving Brady his fourth title.
The NFL suspended Brady after a lawyer hired by the league to
investigate the incident said the quarterback was "generally aware"
two Patriots employees had conspired to deflate the balls, which can
make them easier to grip.
The NFL meanwhile penalized the Patriots by fining the team $1
million and taking away two draft picks, which Patriots owner Robert
Kraft in May 2015 reluctantly accepted.
In a split 2-1 decision in April, a three-judge panel of the 2nd
Circuit reversed a lower court's ruling that threw out Brady's
penalty, holding that NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell "properly
exercised his broad discretion to resolve an intramural controversy
between the League and a player."
[to top of second column] |
Patriots quarterback Tom Brady (12) reacts before the game against
the Kansas City Chiefs in the AFC Divisional round playoff game at
Gillette Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Greg M. Cooper-USA TODAY
Sports/File Photo
Brady and the union on Monday sought to have the original
three-judge appeals court panel to reconsider its decision, or have
all 13 active judges on the 2nd Circuit review the case in an "en
banc" proceeding.
The Patriots said the team wanted to address to the court the
"fundamental unfairness" of the process that led Goodell to penalize
Brady.
The 2nd Circuit is known among lawyers for almost never rehearing
cases en banc. It is unclear how soon it will decide on a rehearing.
If it decides not to get involved, Brady could appeal to the U.S.
Supreme Court.
(Reporting by Nate Raymond in New York; Editing by Steve Orlofsky)
[© 2016 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
Copyright 2016 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
|