| 
             
			
			 The D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals said the Reynolds American Inc 
			unit, whose brands include Camel, Newport and Pall Mall, did not 
			show that the judge who ordered the ads exceeded her authority, and 
			waited too long to challenge the requirement. 
			 
			Reynolds American spokesman Bryan Hatchell declined to comment. 
			 
			The ads were among a series of remedial measures imposed in 2006 by 
			U.S. District Judge Gladys Kessler in Washington, D.C. against R.J. 
			Reynolds, Altria Group Inc's Philip Morris USA and other tobacco 
			companies, after she found them liable for concealing the risks of 
			smoking for decades. 
			 
			Kessler had required that each defendant run primetime ads on a 
			major TV network at least once a week for a year. 
			
			  
			The companies later litigated over what the ads should say. 
			 
			But R.J. Reynolds also objected to the U.S. Department of Justice's 
			insistence that it run two sets of ads, one for itself and one in 
			its capacity as the successor to Brown & Williamson, which it bought 
			in 2004. 
			 
			In Tuesday's decision, however, Circuit Judge David Tatel said R.J. 
			Reynolds failed to raise the double-ad issue in 2006 when it first 
			appealed Kessler's remedial order. 
			 
			He said this meant the Winston-Salem, North Carolina-based company 
			could not be excused for waiting until 2014, when the government 
			made its position known during negotiations, to object. 
			
            [to top of second column]  | 
            
             
  
            
			"Simply put, RJR cannot have it both ways," Tatel wrote. "Either the 
			remedial order imposes a double-ad requirement, in which case we 
			have appellate jurisdiction but RJR has no excuse for its 
			untimeliness, or the order is unclear, in which case we would lack 
			jurisdiction to entertain this appeal." 
			 
			The decision upheld Kessler's June 2014 order outlining the 
			dissemination of corrective statements. R.J. Reynolds agreed to the 
			order but preserved its right to appeal the double-ad requirement. 
			 
			On Oct. 21, British American Tobacco Plc offered to buy Reynolds 
			American for $47 billion. 
			 
			The case is U.S. et al v. Philip Morris USA Inc et al, D.C. Circuit 
			Court of Appeals, No. 15-5210. 
			 
			(Reporting by Jonathan Stempel in New York; Editing by Chris Reese) 
			[© 2016 Thomson Reuters. All rights 
				reserved.] Copyright 2016 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, 
			broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. 
			
			
			  
			
			
			   |