Freedom or 'fool's errand'? D.C. to vote
on statehood referendum
Send a link to a friend
[November 05, 2016]
By Ian Simpson
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Long-frustrated
backers of statehood for the District of Columbia are pinning their
hopes on a first-ever referendum on Tuesday in a long-shot bid to become
the 51st U.S. state.
Invoking the colonial-era demand of "no taxation without
representation," supporters say becoming a state would end
Washingtonians' status as second-class citizens because they lack
representation in Congress.
But opponents dismiss the referendum as a "fool's errand" destined to
fail because of partisan political hurdles and the need to amend the
U.S. Constitution, a procedure accomplished only 17 times since 1789.
The District of Columbia was carved out to serve as the nation's
capital, but it is not a state. Its 672,000 residents have no voting
representative in the Senate or House of Representatives although they
pay federal taxes, though they do have a delegate in the House.
A "yes" vote could help pressure the new Congress and president - either
Democrat Hillary Clinton or Republican Donald Trump - to admit the
District of Columbia as a new state, though even advocates admit that is
unlikely anytime soon.
A "yes" vote would simply be an expression of public support for
statehood, a non-binding measure without any legal force.
![](http://archives.lincolndailynews.com/2016/Nov/05/images/ads/current/lincolntheatre_sda_031016.png)
"Statehood's the only way that we can have the same rights and
responsibilities as all the other citizens of the United States,"
District of Columbia Council Chairman Phil Mendelson said.
The overwhelmingly Democratic capital city was fed up with Republican
lawmakers espousing the rights of states and cities to self-governance
and then interfering with local issues such as abortion and marijuana
legalization, Mendelson said.
"That's so antithetical to democratic principles, but that doesn't seem
to bother some of these folks," he said.
The referendum seeks to upend the Constitution's provision giving
Congress legislative control over the District of Columbia.
Voters will cast a single "yes" or "no" vote on the referendum's four
parts: admission as a state, its boundaries, approval of a constitution,
and guarantees of a representative form of government.
The new state would embrace the current 68-square-mile (176-square-km)
district except for a core of federal property around the White House,
Capitol and monument-rich National Mall.
The District Council approved the referendum unanimously, and a
Washington Post poll in November 2015 showed 67 percent of residents
backed statehood. The Democratic Party's national platform also supports
the idea.
[to top of second column] |
![](../images/110516pics/news_d7.jpg)
Work begins on building the inaugural parade stands in front of the
White House in Washington, U.S. November 3, 2016. REUTERS/Kevin
Lamarque
![](../images/ads/current/richardson_lda_090916.png)
"If you're not part of a state, large parts of the constitution
don't apply to you," said statehood advocate Ann Loikow.
Mayor Muriel Bowser and other statehood backers took the vote's
design from the successful bid in the 1790s by Tennessee, then a
federal territory, to become a state through a referendum and
petition to Congress.
Supporters and skeptics say that even if the referendum passes it
would face a dead end in Congress, where Republicans would oppose
statehood since it would add Democratic senators and a
representative to Congress.
Besides the political obstacles, Roger Pilon, a constitutional
scholar at the libertarian Cato Institute, called the statehood
quest a "fool's errand" because of constitutional obstacles.
For the District to become a state, Congress would have to propose
an amendment to the Constitution, which would then have to win a
two-thirds majority vote in both the Senate and the House.
Even if an amendment could win approval in both houses of Congress,
it would face another big hurdle: approval by the legislatures of at
least three-fourths of the 50 states.
Washingtonians have tried to achieve statehood before, but never by
an up-or-down referendum. Congress ignored a statehood petition that
included a constitution voters ratified in the 1980s.
The House of Representatives rejected a statehood bill in 1993, and
it failed to reach a Senate vote. A constitutional amendment for
voting rights in Congress fizzled in the 1980s.
(Reporting by Ian Simpson; Editing by Daniel Trotta and Leslie
Adler)
[© 2016 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
Copyright 2016 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
![](http://archives.lincolndailynews.com/2016/Nov/05/images/ads/current/graue_sda_june2015.png)
![](http://archives.lincolndailynews.com/2016/Aug/26/images/ads/current/ldn_business_directory_small2_2016.png) |