Little evidence for
risks, or benefits, of habitual barefootedness
Send a link to a friend
[November 12, 2016]
By Kathryn Doyle
(Reuters Health) - Studies on the long-term effects of habitual barefoot
walking or running are scarce, and there is only limited evidence for
more foot problems and no evidence for higher injury rates among people
who are often barefoot, according to a new review.
|
“Having the huge ‘barefoot debate’ in mind, we expected more
evidence on the long-term effects of barefoot locomotion,” said lead
author Dr. Karsten Hollander of the Institute of Human Movement
Science at the University of Hamburg in Germany.
Some populations, for example South Africa, include many people who
are habitually barefoot, Hollander told Reuters Health by email. He
and his colleagues are currently preparing a large study comparing
barefoot children in South Africa to shod children in South Africa
and Germany on the basis of foot development and motor performance.
For the review, Hollander and coauthors included 15 studies of more
than 8,000 people, total, comparing the physical metrics,
biomechanics, motor performance and pathologies of habitually
barefoot and habitually shod people.
Habitually barefoot people tended to have slightly wider feet than
people who wore shoes. Relative injury rates were similar regardless
of footwear state, as reported in Medicine and Science in Sports and
Exercise.
There was no evidence that habitually barefoot people have better
motor performance in the long-term, and there was very limited
evidence for health-related outcomes, the authors wrote.
The body adapts well to walking or running barefoot, Hollander said,
“but the body needs time to adapt to this new technique and I think
the amount of training and recovery a body needs is individually
different.”
“There is some evidence for endurance running having been an
important factor of our evolution and most probably our ancestors
did run barefoot or with minimalistic footwear,” he said.
[to top of second column] |
Besides blisters, cuts and bruises, there may be different injury
patterns in barefoot runners, he said.
“While shod running leads to more injuries at the plantar fascia,
knee, hip and back, barefoot runners were more prone to be injured
at the Achilles tendon and other tendons of the lower extremity,” he
said.
But there seems to be no evidence for more or less overall injuries
– and neither is there evidence for protective effects of footwear
on injuries, Hollander said. Barefoot locomotion may make for
stronger feet.
“My personal opinion is that many people could benefit from walking
barefoot,” taking care to avoid hazards, he said. Minimalist shoes
may help protect the foot from hazards like glass or sharp stones.
“But the important thing is that the transfer to barefoot or
minimalist shoes needs time and some adaptation in the running
technique,” he said.
SOURCE: http://bit.ly/2frOr1J Medicine and Science in Sports and
Exercise, online October 31, 2016.
[© 2016 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2016 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
|