After U.S. election,
retirement security heads for a crash
Send a link to a friend
[November 14, 2016]
By Mark Miller
CHICAGO
(Reuters) - Retirement security already looked like a looming train
wreck for most U.S. households before Election Day. Now, the
consolidation of Republican control of government threatens to
accelerate the crash.
It is too early to predict the agenda Donald Trump will bring to the
White House on retirement policy, or where it might fit on his priority
list. We live in a rapidly aging nation, but retirement policy never
received a serious airing during the hot mess of a campaign that just
ended.
It is also impossible to predict how Trump’s priorities will match up
with those of Republican leaders in Congress, considering their deep
divides on many issues during the campaign.
But previous Republican proposals and Trump’s campaign pledges point
toward a range of possible GOP retirement initiatives between now and
the 2018 midterm elections.
The economic frustrations of older, middle-class voters played an
important role in Trump’s upset win over Hillary Clinton. Exit polling
reveals that voters above age 45 favored him, especially among
middle-class households.
These are households bearing the brunt of job loss, income inequality,
the decline of traditional defined benefit pensions, rising healthcare
costs and shrinking Social Security benefits. And they have managed to
save precious little for retirement: 62 percent of working households
headed by people aged 55-64 have less than one year of annual income,
according to the National Institute on Retirement Security (NIRS) - far
less than they will need to maintain their standard of living in
retirement.
But here is the irony: Republican control of the White House and
Congress over the next two years could leave these struggling
near-retirement households even worse off. Below is just a partial
rundown of the retirement-related issues that will bear careful
watching.
OBAMACARE REPEAL
This might not seem like a retirement issue at first glance. But if
Trump and Republican lawmakers make good on their promises to repeal the
Affordable Care Act, millions of older Americans who fall short of
Medicare’s eligibility age (65) likely will lose their health insurance.
Hate Obamacare if you like, but it has hugely benefited millions of
older low- and middle-income households. The Commonwealth Fund estimates
that the percentage of uninsured Americans aged 50-64 fell to 9.1
percent this year, compared with 14 percent in 2013. That translates to
3.1 million previously uninsured people who now have health insurance.
Republicans will likely try to repeal the law, or at minimum gut many of
its most important provisions, such as Medicaid coverage for low-income
people, and premium subsidies for middle-income households.
The uninsured-and-over-fifty group will be more likely to forego
healthcare, and they will arrive at Medicare’s doorstep with more
untreated illnesses.
“If they repeal it and don’t replace it with something meaningful, it’s
going to really hurt this older population,” said Christian Weller,
professor of public policy at the University of Massachusetts Boston.
SPIKE THE FIDUCIARY RULE
The U.S. Department of Labor finalized rules this year requiring all
financial advisers working with retirement accounts to avoid conflicts
and act in the best interest of clients in the products they recommend.
This is a huge, positive step in reforming the way retirement savings
are managed.
[to top of second column] |
A pair of elderly couples view the ocean and waves along the beach
in La Jolla, California March 8, 2012. REUTERS/Mike Blake
Trump took no position on the so-called fiduciary rule, but he has
pledged to cut government regulation aggressively. And one of his
advisers promised during the campaign to repeal the rule, even likening
it to slavery.
Financial-services lobbyists have been trying to spike the Labor
Department rule in the courts and through legislation; President Barack
Obama vetoed Republican-sponsored legislation aimed at blocking it in
June.
“There is potential for a partial or full pullback," said Rick Jones,
senior partner and national retirement practice leader at Aon Hewitt.
CUT SOCIAL SECURITY AND MEDICARE
Trump said during the campaign he does not favor cutting Social Security
or Medicare benefits. But Republican congressional leadership has long
favored raising the Social Security retirement age, reducing
cost-of-living adjustments and at least partial privatization of the
program by allowing workers to divert part of their payroll tax
contribution to a personal savings account.
This year’s Republican convention platform stated that Social Security’s
solvency problems should be addressed without tax increases. That is a
de facto call for benefit cuts, because there are only two ways to solve
Social Security’s financial problems: cut benefits or increase revenue.
The platform also contained a vague call for privatization.
On Medicare, House Speaker Paul Ryan has advanced plans repeatedly to
shift Medicare toward so-called premium support. Seniors could choose
between private insurance plans and traditional Medicare, and receive a
voucher from the federal government to purchase coverage. Studies have
shown this approach would shift costs to seniors.
RETIREMENT SAVING, LONG-TERM CARE
Among the other questions to ponder: How will we reform our retirement
saving system to increase coverage and low-cost saving? How will we fix
our broken approach to financing long-term care?
All told, the inequalities in our retirement security system could grow
worse over the next four years - much worse. That would be not just an
ironic outcome of this election - it would be tragic.
(The opinions expressed here are those of the author, a columnist for
Reuters)
(Editing by Matthew Lewis)
[© 2016 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2016 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. |