These kinds of factors may be modifiable, the authors write in
Obstetrics and Gynecology.
“Many social factors have a major impact on overall pregnancy
health,” said Dr. Laura Colicchia, who led the study at the
University of Pittsburgh and is currently in Maternal-Fetal Medicine
at Abbott Northwestern Hospital in Minneapolis.
About 200,000 U.S. women develop diabetes during pregnancy each
year, Colicchia said, and they must follow a strict diet, prick
their fingers four times daily to check blood sugar, report their
blood sugars to the doctor weekly, have frequent office visits and
ultrasounds, and in many cases take insulin or medications several
times daily to control their sugars.
“Gestational diabetes impacts every aspect of a woman's life
including eating with and cooking for her family, scheduling her
blood sugar checks and meals at work, where she obtains the food to
follow the diet and how she creates time for everything,” she said.
“Because of this, barriers to management of diabetes can come from
any part of her life including her family, her neighborhood, her
daily routine or her employer,” she told Reuters Health by email.
Women who are obese, have limited access to food or are from
marginalized communities are at higher risk for gestational diabetes
and often have higher blood sugar levels when diabetes is diagnosed
making it harder to control, Colicchia noted.
The researchers surveyed 111 women with gestational diabetes at
clinical visits, using questionnaires designed to measure social
support and degree of life “chaos,” which includes organization,
stability and the ability to plan and prepare for the future.
They later analyzed medical records for blood sugar control and
pregnancy outcomes, including infant size, maternal weight gain,
cesarean delivery and newborn health.
Women were rated as having good blood sugar control if at least 70
percent of their blood sugar assessments were at goal level or
better.
Overall, 86 of the 111 women achieved good glycemic control, either
by diet changes alone or with the help of medication and insulin
treatment. These women were more likely to be married, have higher
household income and exercise three times a week, and less likely to
have public insurance or a history of depression or anxiety.
In general, food access and social support were not related to blood
sugar control, though women receiving Supplemental Nutrition
Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits tended to have worse blood sugar
control.
[to top of second column] |
Women with poor blood sugar control had higher scores on the chaotic
lifestyle scale than those with good control, the authors also
found.
“Women are not always able to change many things that make life
chaotic such as unstable housing, unpredictable work schedules,
poverty and family stressors,” Colicchia said. “However, the
gestational diabetes regimen in many cases can be adjusted to
accommodate some of these factors, such as adjusting mealtimes or
medication times to the woman's new schedule, or giving suggestions
for healthy meals that can be eaten on the go or can be cooked
ahead.”
Women who lack material resources and live amidst hubbub and chaos
brought on by caring for children and working and the absence of a
partner may have more trouble controlling their blood sugar, said
Nancy Ross of McGill University in Montreal who was not involved in
the study.
“It seems like these women need help to lessen the ‘hubbub and
chaos’ - perhaps shorter working hours, some breaks from caring for
children to focus on shopping and meal preparation and having time
to exercise,” Ross said by email.
Doctors should ask women about the social factors relevant to
diabetes care, and women should be honest with their doctors about
the limitations they face, Colicchia said. ‘
“If doctors and nutritionists know in advance that a woman will not
be able to eat breakfast because she has to get her kids on the bus,
or that her employer won't let her check her sugar after lunch we
can make suggestions and adjustments to accommodate some of these
factors,” she said.
SOURCE: http://bit.ly/2fTe371 Obstetrics and Gynecology, online
November 3, 2016.
[© 2016 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2016 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. |