U.S. native groups promised input on
development as pipeline dispute looms
Send a link to a friend
[November 18, 2016]
By Valerie Volcovici and Patrick Rucker
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The United States
plans to gather more input from native people as officials contemplate
projects like the Dakota Access Pipeline, according to a White House
notice posted on Thursday that could delay the controversial plan.
The Army Corps of Engineers plans to "revise its regulations" to ensure
its consultations with sovereign tribes are "confirmed by the U.S.
Constitution, treaties, statutes, executive orders, judicial decisions
and presidential documents and policies."
The proposed change comes in the form of what is known as an Advance
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, which states an agency's intention to
issue a new regulation.
The Army Corps of Engineers, which manages many federal infrastructure
projects, did not immediately respond to a request for comment Thursday
evening.
The pending rule is being contemplated in the final weeks of President
Barack Obama's term when the administration is mulling whether or not to
allow the Dakota Access crude pipeline.
President-elect Donald Trump is due to be sworn in on Jan. 20. Under
federal law, the incoming president has authority to invalidate many
last-minute decisions from an outgoing administration.
The notice, which was posted on the website of the U.S. Office
Information and Regulatory Affairs, said the public will be able to
comment on the proposal until Jan. 1, 2017.
[to top of second column] |
Protesters gather in front of the Bank of North Dakota in Bismarck
during a protest against plans to pass the Dakota Access pipeline
near the Standing Rock Indian Reservation, North Dakota, U.S.
November 16, 2016. REUTERS/Stephanie Keith
The Obama administration has been in a quandary over whether to
issue a permit to allow the completion of the final leg of the
pipeline.
Demonstrators fanned out across North America on Tuesday to demand
that the U.S. government either halt or reroute the pipeline, while
Energy Transfer Partners, the company behind the controversial
project, asked a federal court for permission to complete it.
(Additional reporting by Ethan Lou in New York; Editing by Cynthia
Osterman and Stephen Coates)
[© 2016 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
Copyright 2016 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
|