 The Illinois General Assembly opted to expand Medicaid through Obamacare in May
2013. This expansion created a new Medicaid category for able-bodied adults ages
19-64 with incomes below 138 percent of the federal poverty level.
But the Medicaid program was designed to serve the truly vulnerable – the aged,
the blind and the disabled – and expansion critics have long warned that
creating a new welfare class would prioritize able-bodied adults and put more
vulnerable people at risk by redirecting limited resources. Now, newly obtained
data from the Illinois Department of Human Services, or DHS, confirm these
fears.
According to documents provided by the department, 752 Illinoisans on the
state’s Medicaid waiting list have died awaiting needed care since the General
Assembly voted to accept the Obamacare expansion for able-bodied adults. That’s
18 deaths each month, on average, since the expansion was authorized.
According to the most recent data from the state, there are 18,701 Illinoisans
on the state’s Prioritization for Urgency of Need for Services Medicaid waiting
list. These are Illinoisans who, for a variety of reasons, need care beyond what
Medicaid currently provides for them and have applied for additional services,
such as in-home care. They are children with developmental disabilities,
seniors, individuals with severe mental illnesses, and more – people Medicaid
was intended to serve.
But, due to a lack of funding, these Illinoisans wait for the care they need.
And while the state has been busy enrolling as many able-bodied adults as
possible in the Medicaid expansion and not making the needs of these disabled
and elderly Illinoisans a priority – new information from DHS shows the toll
it’s taking.
While 12,000 Illinoisans were removed from the Prioritization for Urgency of
Need for Services list since May 2013, just 29 percent of those cases were
closed because the Medicaid recipients had received all the services they
needed. The rest were closed due to death, moving, withdrawal of requests, or
other reasons.
And, thanks to poor policy choices by the state, this waiting list nightmare may
only be a sign of things to come.
[to top of second column] |
The state’s most recent enrollment reports show more than 650,000
able-bodied adults have enrolled in Medicaid since the Obamacare
expansion, and this enrollment shows no sign of slowing down. This
is nearly twice as many adults as the state said would ever enroll
and more than the state said would ever even be eligible.
Expansion costs are also significantly over projections. Despite
promises from the administration of former Gov. Pat Quinn that total
expansion costs would “only” hit $2.7 billion in the first two
years, costs actually came in at $4.7 billion – 70 percent higher
than promised.
Near the end of Quinn’s term, Quinn administration officials also
confirmed in a memo to the federal government that the state’s share
of the costs would soar. Officials revised state costs up to $2
billion through 2020, more than three times as much as initially
expected. And the day of reckoning for state taxpayers is almost
here: Starting in January 2017, the state will be on the hook for 5
percent of the expansion costs.
All of these factors, combined with the fact that Illinois has
nearly $11 billion in unpaid bills and the worst-funded pension
system in the country, paint a bleak picture for the state’s truly
vulnerable. If nothing changes, cuts in services for seniors,
children, and individuals with disabilities may be on the table.
This wouldn’t be unprecedented: The very day the General Assembly
voted to expand Obamacare two years early, lawmakers cut funding for
lifesaving medication and services for medically fragile children,
including critical seizure medication for Jake Chalkey of Streator,
Ill.
Fortunately, Congress may save state policymakers from their own
poor choices by repealing Obamacare in early 2017. This would be a
huge step in the right direction and would offer hope to Illinoisans
who continue to wait for the care they desperately need.
Click here to respond to the editor about this article
|
