| 
		Leaner and meaner: U.S. shale greater 
		threat to OPEC after oil price war 
		 Send a link to a friend 
		
		 [November 30, 2016] 
		By Catherine Ngai and Ernest Scheyder 
 NEW YORK/HOUSTON (Reuters) - In a corner of 
		the prolific Bakken shale play in North Dakota, oil companies can now 
		pump crude at a price almost as low as that enjoyed by OPEC giants Iran 
		and Iraq.
 
 Until a few years ago it was unprofitable to produce oil from shale in 
		the United States. The steep slide in costs could encourage more U.S. 
		shale output if OPEC members cut supplies, undermining the producer 
		group's ability to boost prices. OPEC ministers meet Wednesday to weigh 
		output cuts to end a two-year glut that has pressured global oil prices.
 
 In shale fields from Texas to North Dakota, production costs have 
		roughly halved since 2014, when Saudi Arabia signaled an output 
		free-for-all in an attempt to drive higher-cost shale producers out of 
		the market.
 
 Rather than killing the U.S. shale industry, the ensuing two-year price 
		war made shale a stronger rival, even in the current low-price 
		environment.
 
 In Dunn County, North Dakota, there are around 2,000 square miles where 
		the cost to produce Bakken shale is $15 a barrel and falling, according 
		to Lynn Helms, head of the state's Department of Mineral Resources.
 
 "The success in Dunn County has been fantastic," said Ron Ness, 
		president of the North Dakota Petroleum Council.
 
 Dunn County's cost is about the same as Iran's, and a little higher than 
		Iraq's. Dunn County produces about 200,000 barrels of oil a day, about a 
		fifth of daily production in the state.
 
		
		 
		It is North Dakota's sweet spot because it boasts the lowest costs in 
		the state, yet improved technology and drilling techniques have boosted 
		efficiency for the whole state and the entire U.S. oil industry.
 The breakeven cost per barrel, on average, to produce Bakken shale at 
		the wellhead has fallen to $29.44 in 2016 from $59.03 in 2014, according 
		to consultancy Rystad Energy. It added that in terms of wellhead prices, 
		Bakken is the most competitive of major U.S. shale plays.
 
 Wood Mackenzie said technology advances should further reduce breakeven 
		points.
 
 Landlocked Bakken producers still need a substantially higher 
		international price than their breakeven cost to make a profit, since 
		they pay more to transport crude to market than producers in most other 
		U.S. regions.
 
 International oil prices of $45 a barrel are enough for some Bakken 
		producers to profit, Ness said, and $55 would encourage production 
		growth.
 
 Benchmark Brent prices plummeted from nearly $116 a barrel in mid-2014 
		to just $27 earlier this year. Prices have since recovered to nearly 
		$46. That is still too low for members of the Organization of the 
		Petroleum Exporting Countries, whose state budgets depend on petrodollar 
		revenues that plummeted during the price war.
 
 [to top of second column]
 | 
            
			 
            
			Pumpjacks and other infrastructure for producing oil dot fields 
			outside of Watford City, North Dakota, U.S. on January 21, 2016. 
			REUTERS/Andrew Cullen/File Photo 
            
			 
			For OPEC ministers meeting in Vienna on Wednesday, a major concern 
			is that an output cut would encourage a quick response from U.S. 
			shale producers, who have slashed costs and have been steadily 
			adding drilling rigs.
 "Right now, OPEC understands we're in a push-and-pull experiment 
			with the United States," said Michael Tran, director of energy 
			strategy at RBC Capital Markets in New York.
 
 "Two years ago, we thought prices hovering around $50 to $60 meant 
			that non-OPEC production growth would end. But U.S. production came 
			back stronger."
 
 In a recent earnings call, Hess Corp said it has improved its cost 
			performance in the Bakken, with well costs falling and initial 
			production rates rising, though it did not give more details.
 
 "Everybody is drilling wells faster and completing them better," 
			said Mike Breard, an energy stock analyst at Hodges Capital 
			Management in Dallas. "It's not just a Bakken phenomenon."
 
 Breard said he prefers shale stocks in the Permian basin in Texas, 
			where he is expecting more big gains in production next year. He is 
			eyeing firms such as Parsley Energy Inc, Ring Energy Inc and Matador 
			Resources Co.
 
 Oil companies are already investing big money to benefit from 
			shale's resurgence. Tesoro Corp recently snapped up Western Refining 
			Inc in a $4 billion deal to bulk up its exposure in Texas.
 
 Separately, trading firm Castleton Commodities International LLC 
			bought more than $1 billion in assets from Anadarko Petroleum Corp 
			to increase its stake in East Texas.
 
 Occidental Petroleum Corp's top executive recently said that company 
			has enjoyed steady improvement in well productivity and lower 
			drilling and completion costs in the Permian Basin.
 
			
			 
			"Simply put, we can deliver more production with fewer wells," Vicki 
			Hollub, the company's president and chief executive, told analysts 
			on a recent call.
 
 (Additional reporting by Lewis Krauskopf in New York; editing by 
			Simon Webb and David Gregorio)
 
			[© 2016 Thomson Reuters. All rights 
			reserved.] Copyright 2016 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, 
			broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. |