| Rodriguez for Congress campaign Environmental Protection
 
		 Send a link to a friend 
            
            [October 10, 2016]
            
            
            
             Rodriguez Believes Data-Driven 
			Decisions Are Key to Wise Environmental Policy - Recently, while 
			attending a county fair, I had a conversation with a gentleman who 
			tried to convince me that the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 
			needed to be abolished. I listened politely to his argument but then 
			countered with an explanation of why such a position was unsound.  | 
        
            | 
			
			 For those who are ideological conservatives, it is 
			patently absurd to believe that they would be opposed to the idea of 
			conservation—it is the very root of the modern environmental 
			movement. Two Republican presidents, Theodore Roosevelt and Richard 
			Nixon, were the greatest champions of the conservation movement, and 
			each signed into law signature legislation that advanced the cause 
			of environmental protection in the U.S. This topic is not one that 
			should have a partisan divide between the left and the right; if 
			anything, it should be one of the points of common sense agreement 
			between people of different political stripes. 
 Regardless of political affiliation, we all appreciate the benefits 
			of clean air and clean water, both on a personal and a societal 
			level. Although a cost may be involved to achieve this, it is clear 
			that the benefits far outweigh the shared burden to attain these 
			goals. Although some might claim that the free market, if left to 
			its own devices, would make wise choices and thereby protect the 
			environment, we know from experience that markets do not have a 
			reputation for making moral choices. It is through deliberate 
			decisions, like removing lead from paint and from gasoline, that we 
			see legislative solutions to societal problems that can be 
			addressed. Were we to ignore such remedies that serve the public 
			good simply to satisfy ideological purity, we would find ourselves 
			in a dangerous world. For instance, would you freely choose to work 
			in an asbestos-laden workplace, or to put it more bluntly, how much 
			mercury do you like with your fish?
 
			
			 Common sense regulation that is rooted in the public interest is 
			beneficial to society, but we must be careful to avoid the excesses 
			of over-regulation that an increasingly bureaucratic state can 
			create. Federal courts have recently blocked the Waters of the 
			United States (WOTUS) rule that the EPA was hoping to enact as part 
			of an expansion of the Clean Water Act. Under this proposed rule, 
			the EPA would have redefined what constitutes “navigable waterways” 
			and thereby extended federal control onto private property. I 
			believe that the courts acted properly in this regard. [to 
			top of second column] | 
			
			 The key to enacting common sense policy with regard 
			to environmental protection is that decisions must be data-driven 
			and not rooted in ideological talking points of either party. 
			Failure to make data-driven decisions will only lead to more 
			man-made disasters like the water crisis in Flint, MI. We can, and 
			must, do better than this as a society, because today’s policy 
			failures will have serious ramifications for generations to come. We 
			cannot be science deniers. We need effective leadership and good 
			stewardship to be our guiding principles as we move forward on 
			matters of environmental policy.
 My opponent has recently joined with other political ideologues to 
			try to prevent several attorneys general in various states from 
			moving forward with an investigation of ExxonMobil to see if the 
			company misled its own shareholders and the general public from 
			knowledge linking emission of greenhouse gases and environmental 
			degradation. Key to this matter is the place of data-driven 
			decisions that are based upon scientific assessments. The political 
			class should not give shelter to special interests like 
			multi-national corporations that withhold evidence because they wish 
			to protect the company’s bottom line. Clean politics may be 
			difficult to attain, but if clean air and clean water measures are 
			any indication, it is possible to reduce the toxic irritants that we 
			currently face.
 [Text from file received] Past related 
			articles |