U.S. watchdog expands
scrutiny to more Chinese deals
Send a link to a friend
[October 11, 2016]
By Greg Roumeliotis
(Reuters) -
Insurance
mergers and acquisitions rarely raise red flags with U.S. national
security watchdogs. China's Fosun International Ltd <0656.HK> took that
history to heart last year when it paid $1.84 billion for the remaining
80 percent stake of U.S. property and casualty insurer Ironshore Inc
that it did not already own.
But in December 2015, one month after Fosun completed the acquisition,
it was approached by officials at the Committee on Foreign Investment in
the United States (CFIUS), a government panel that scrutinizes deals
over national security concerns, according to people familiar with the
matter who asked not to be identified because these details are not
public.
CFIUS was concerned about how Fosun would operate Ironshore's Wright &
Co, a provider of professional liability coverage to U.S. government
employees such as law enforcement personnel and national security
officials, including the Central Intelligence Agency, according to these
sources.
Fosun, Ironshore and CFIUS all declined to comment on the process.
CFIUS operates a voluntary filing system for companies engaged in a
deal. Such an instance of the panel approaching companies after they
complete a deal is rare.
But the recent U.S. scrutiny of Fosun -- which did not seek CFIUS
approval for the Ironshore deal -- is just one example of a new impetus
by CFIUS to target what it refers to as "non-notified transactions" --
or deals that did not seek CFIUS approval in advance.
In the last twelve months CFIUS has stepped up its pursuit of these
non-filers over concerns that some deals were falling through the
cracks, according to sources with direct knowledge of the panel's inner
workings. This previously unreported push by CFIUS has the potential to
delay some deals and raises the risk of them being thwarted altogether.
While Wright accounted for a tiny fraction of Ironshore's business, the
inquiry has forced Fosun to delay its initial public offering of
Ironshore, which has been registered with the U.S. Securities and
Exchange Commission since June, until CFIUS clears the original
acquisition. Fosun will now likely miss a window for IPOs due to the
expected market volatility around the Nov. 8 U.S. presidential election,
according to the sources.
Chinese companies have been treated with suspicion by CFIUS because of
the ties many of them have to the country's communist regime, reflecting
the complicated diplomatic and commercial ties between China and the
United States.
This has not stopped Premier Li Keqiang's "going out" policy, which
encourages Chinese companies to buy foreign trophy assets. The push --
aided by CFIUS's history of rarely shooting down deals altogether --
contributed to Chinese M&A activity in the United States reaching a
record high of $32 billion so far this year.
To be sure, CFIUS has approached companies in the past as well, and does
not limit its review to only Chinese deals. In 2010, CFIUS contacted
Russian internet company CMail.ru and AOL Inc over the latter's $188
million divestment of messaging service ICQ to Cmail.ru, which had
already been completed. The CFIUS review in that instance did not
require the deal to be unraveled.
On rare occasions, the panel has also vetoed deals, such as the $3.3
billion sale of Koninklijke Philips NV's lighting business to a
consortium of Chinese investors, which it blocked last January.
But Ironshore and similar cases this year show that the U.S. watchdog is
flexing its muscles in a more subtle, albeit disruptive, fashion.
"Companies may assume that there is no chance that CFIUS would have an
interest in their transaction, but that runs the risk of possible
miscalculation," said Eric Dinallo, a partner at law firm Debevoise &
Plimpton LLP.
RISING SCRUTINY
CFIUS, an agency made up of eight U.S. government departments and
chaired by the Treasury Secretary, does not publicize the reasons for
its decisions. The majority of transactions involve private companies
with no SEC filings.
Recent regulatory filings and statements by publicly listed companies,
however, offer glimpses of CFIUS catching some companies off guard. U.S.
electronics distributor Ingram Micro Inc <IM.N> said in July it would
seek CFIUS approval for its acquisition by Chinese shipping company
Tianjin Tianhai Investment, despite saying in February it did not need
to, following "consultation" with CFIUS.
As a result, in August Ingram Micro pushed back the deadline for the
deal with Tianjin to close by three months to Nov. 13. CFIUS is
interested in learning more about the company's supply of technology to
the U.S. government, according to the sources. Ingram Micro and Tianjin
Tianhai declined to comment.
CFIUS has added staff and resources in the last two years to identify
non-notified transactions, the sources said, though the number of
additional people recruited or the extra funding it was given could not
be learned.
Among the CFIUS staffers playing a role in identifying non-filers,
alongside CFIUS Staff Chairman Stephen Hanson and Treasury Deputy
Assistant Secretary for Investment Security Aimen Mir, is Brian Reissaus,
a former member of the Defense Security Service, an agency of the U.S.
Department of Defense, according to the sources. Reissaus will often be
the CFIUS staffer reaching out to companies, the sources said.
[to top of second column] |
A Chinese national flag (L) flies in front of a building of the
headquarters of Fosun International, in Shanghai, China, March 29,
2016. REUTERS/Aly Song
A
Treasury spokesman declined to comment on behalf of CFIUS and the staffers.
Chinese government officials declined to comment on CFIUS's new focus.
CAUGHT OFF-GUARD
CFIUS's crackdown on these non-notified transactions shows how the agency's
focus has expanded beyond traditional sectors of national security concern, such
as aerospace and semiconductors, to less obvious areas ranging from commercial
IT and agriculture to biomedical science and electronics.
Companies whose deals are reviewed by CFIUS without having made voluntary
filings risk delays in completing them and uncertainty over their investment
plans, lawyers say.
In the case of Fosun, to ensure CFIUS approval Ironshore agreed to sell Wright
last month to former American International Group Inc <AIG.N> CEO Hank
Greenberg's Starr Companies, according to the sources.
In
light of this divestment and other conversations it had with CFIUS, the company
has reset the CFIUS review process by making another filing with the panel, and
an outcome is expected in the coming weeks, one of the sources added.
In the interim, Fosun has been exploring selling Ironshore outright as an
alternative to an IPO, according to the sources.
HELL OR HIGH WATER
Some companies resist filing for a CFIUS review voluntarily because they fear
that addressing this issue during their tough merger negotiations will add an
extra layer of complexity to the talks, and some times risk complicating them to
the point that a deal is not reached.
This is because, once the possibility of a CFIUS review is foreseen in a merger
contract, companies have to haggle over who assumes the financial risk under
various scenarios.
Sellers try to push for "hell-or-high-water" provisions in contracts requiring
the buyers to do whatever it takes in terms of divestitures and other measures
to obtain CFIUS approval. Buyers resist this and seek to negotiate in advance
what CFIUS remedies would be acceptable to them.
A case in point is Zhongwang USA LLC, which is backed by Chinese aluminum
magnate Liu Zhongtian, and its $2.33 billion deal last month to acquire U.S.
aluminum company Aleris Corp <ALSD.PK>. Zhongwang USA agreed to "undertake best
efforts to obtain CFIUS clearance as soon as practicable," while also limiting
any CFIUS-related divestitures it would be willing to accept to 5 percent of
Aleris' 2015 U.S. net sales, a regulatory filing shows.
The heightened scrutiny is also jacking up CFIUS-related breakup fees that
buyers have to agree to in order to get a deal done, with sellers often asking
these to be deposited in escrow accounts for more security. In the case of
Zhongwang, it placed its $100 million breakup fee in an escrow account when it
signed its deal with Aleris.
Taken
together, CFIUS lawyers and other consultants are advising their clients to
proactively file with the agency to get out in front of the scrutiny.
"Go to CFIUS before you close a transaction," said Dinallo. "Our experience has
been that, if there is no issue, CFIUS has been quick to respond."
For a graphic of CFIUS cases over the years click http://fingfx.thomsonreuters.com/gfx/rngs/CFUIS-CHINA/010021WF4MY/CFIUS-CHINA.jpg
For a graphic of how China has accelerated purchases of U.S. companies click
http://fingfx.thomsonreuters.com/gfx/rngs/CFIUS-CHINA/010021ZG4XT/CFIUS-CHINA-DEALS.jpg
(Additional reporting by Diane Bartz in Washington D.C., Mike Stone in New York
and Sue-Lin Wong in Beijing; Editing by Carmel Crimmins and Edward Tobin)
[© 2016 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2016 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
|