| 
		Verizon says Yahoo hack 'material,' could 
		affect deal 
		 Send a link to a friend 
		
		 [October 14, 2016] 
		By David Shepardson 
 WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Verizon 
		Communications Inc <VZ.N> said on Thursday it has a "reasonable basis" 
		to believe Yahoo Inc's <YHOO.O> massive data breach of email accounts 
		represents a material impact that could allow Verizon to withdraw from 
		its $4.83 billion deal to buy the technology company.
 
 Verizon's general counsel Craig Silliman told reporters at a roundtable 
		in Washington the data breach could trigger a clause in the deal that 
		would allow the U.S. wireless company not to complete it.
 
 "I think we have a reasonable basis to believe right now that the impact 
		is material and we're looking to Yahoo to demonstrate to us the full 
		impact. If they believe that it's not then they'll need to show us 
		that," he said, declining to comment on whether talks are under way to 
		renegotiate the purchase price.
 
 Asked for comment, a Yahoo spokesman said: "We are confident in Yahoo’s 
		value and we continue to work towards integration with Verizon."
 
		
		 
		The deal has a clause that says Verizon can withdraw if a new event 
		"reasonably can be expected to have a material adverse effect on the 
		business, assets, properties, results of operation or financial 
		condition of the business.”
 Silliman said the U.S. Federal Trade Commission has approved Verizon's 
		planned acquisition of Yahoo, but it still needs approval from the 
		European Commission and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission is 
		reviewing the proxy.
 
 Verizon has had preliminary briefings from Yahoo but it still needs 
		"significant information" from the company before it makes a final 
		decision on the materiality of the hacking of at least 500 million email 
		accounts, Silliman said.
 
 He said Verizon is "absolutely evaluating (the breach) and will make 
		determinations about whether and how to move forward with the deal based 
		on our evaluation of the materiality."
 
 Yahoo shares ended 1.75 percent lower at $41.62, while Verizon was 
		largely unchanged, closing at $50.29, down 0.02 percent.
 
 Yahoo in September disclosed that it had fallen victim to a data breach 
		in 2014 that compromised users’ names, email addresses, telephone 
		numbers, dates of birth and encrypted passwords.
 
 The company has said the cyber attack was carried out by a 
		“state-sponsored” actor, but some private security experts have 
		challenged that assertion.
 
 Several Democratic senators have pressed Yahoo to reveal more 
		information about the hack and why it took so long to discover.
 
 The internet firm said it learned of the breach this summer while 
		investigating claims of a separate intrusion, but it has not provided a 
		specific timeline of events.
 
 [to top of second column]
 | 
            
			 
            
			The Verizon logo is seen on the side of a truck in New York City, 
			U.S., October 13, 2016. REUTERS/Brendan McDermid 
             
			Some analysts suggested Verizon may be trying to get a better price.
 Roger Entner, an analyst at Recon Analytics, said "Verizon is 
			rightfully upset about Yahoo not properly disclosing the breach."
 
 He said Yahoo would most likely have to consider renegotiating the 
			price with Verizon, if it came to that.
 
 "I don't think it has much of a choice. Who else would want to buy 
			them?" Entner said.
 
 Experts said bidders who try to extract themselves from mergers 
			using the material adverse clause face an uphill battle. No U.S. 
			company has ever invoked the clause successfully in court to get out 
			of a deal.
 
 In 2013, Cooper Tire & Rubber company got cold feet about a $2.5 
			billion sale to Apollo Tyres and argued in the Delaware Court of 
			Chancery that Apollo had seen a material adverse change related to 
			union issues at a subsidiary of the company. The court rejected 
			Cooper Tire’s claims and the deal fell apart.
 
 A Delaware court ruled in 2001 that poultry producer Tyson Foods Inc 
			<TSN.N> could not terminate its merger with beef producer IBP Inc 
			over accounting irregularities. The court said the shortfall was not 
			due to a long-term problem.
 
 (Reporting by David Shepardson, additional reporting by Dustin Volz 
			in Washington, Malathi Nayak in New York and Liana Baker in San 
			Francisco; editing by Leslie Adler, Andrew Hay and Bernard Orr)
 
			[© 2016 Thomson Reuters. All rights 
			reserved.] Copyright 2016 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, 
			broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. 
			
			
			 
			
			 |