Nearly 200 nations agree binding deal to
cut greenhouse gases
Send a link to a friend
[October 15, 2016]
By Clement Uwiringiyimana
KIGALI (Reuters) - Nearly 200 nations have
agreed a legally binding deal to cut back on greenhouse gases used in
refrigerators and air conditioners, a major step against climate change
that prompted loud cheers when it was announced on Saturday.
The deal, which includes the world's two biggest economies, the United
States and China, divides countries into three groups with different
deadlines to reduce the use of factory-made hydrofluorocarbon (HFC)
gases, which can be 10,000 times more powerful than carbon dioxide as
greenhouse gases.
"It’s a monumental step forward," U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry
said as he left the talks in the Rwandan capital of Kigali late on
Friday.
Under the pact, developed nations, including much of Europe and the
United States, commit to reducing their use of the gases incrementally,
starting with a 10 percent cut by 2019 and reaching 85 percent by 2036.
Many wealthier nations have already begun to reduce their use of HFCs.
Two groups of developing countries will freeze their use of the gases by
either 2024 or 2028, and then gradually reduce their use. India, Iran,
Iraq, Pakistan and the Gulf countries will meet the later deadline.
They refused the earlier date because they have fast-expanding middle
classes who want air conditioning in their hot climates, and because
India feared damaging its growing industries.
"Last year in Paris, we promised to keep the world safe from the worst
effects of climate change. Today, we are following through on that
promise," said U.N. environment chief Erik Solheim in a statement,
referring to 2015's Paris climate talks.
GAINING MOMENTUM
The deal binding 197 nations crowns a wave of measures to help fight
climate change this month. Last week, the 2015 Paris Agreement to curb
climate-warming emissions passed its required threshold to enter into
force after India, Canada and the European Parliament ratified it.
But unlike the Paris agreement, the Kigali deal is legally binding, has
very specific timetables and has an agreement by rich countries to help
poor countries adapt their technology.
A quick reduction of HFCs could be a major contribution to slowing
climate change, avoiding perhaps 0.5 degrees Celsius (0.9 Fahrenheit) of
a projected rise in average temperatures by 2100, scientists say.
Environmental groups had called for an ambitious agreement on cutting
HFCs to limit the damage from the roughly 1.6 billion new air
conditioning units expected to come on stream by 2050, reflecting
increased demand from an expanding middle class in Asia, Latin America
and Africa.
Benson Ireri, a senior policy adviser at aid group Christian Aid, said
that all African countries had volunteered for the earlier deadline
because they worried about global warming pushing more of their citizens
into poverty.
"It was a shame that India and a handful of other countries chose a
slower time frame for phasing down HFCs but the bulk of nations,
including China, have seen the benefits of going for a quicker
reduction. It’s also been encouraging to see small island states and
African countries a part of this higher ambition group," he said in a
statement.
[to top of second column] |
Secretary of State John
Kerrydelivers his keynote addres to promote U.S. climate and
environmental goals, at the Meeting of the Parties to the Montreal
Protocol on the elimination of hydro fluorocarbons (HFCs) use, held
in Rwanda's capital Kigali, October 14, 2016. REUTERS/James
A scientific panel advising the signatories to the deal said phasing
out HFCs will cost between $4 billion and $6 billion, said Manoj
Kumar Singh, India's joint secretary at the Ministry of Environment,
Forest and Climate Change.
"The implementation starts from 2024 onwards so there is enough time
to plan and mobilize finance,” he told Reuters.
Donors had already put $80 million in a fund to start implementing
the agreement, said Gina McCarthy, administrator of the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency.
But Sergey Vasiliev, the head of the Russian delegation, said
Russia's estimates of the costs were higher and argued countries'
contributions to a multilateral fund to help poor countries adapt
their technology should be voluntary.
The details of the funding will be finalised at a later meeting.
"We think it is more than $10 billion and some experts estimated up
to $20 billion,” he told Reuters.
The HFC talks build on the 1987 Montreal Protocol, which succeeded
in phasing out the use of chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs), widely used at
that time in refrigeration and aerosols.
The protocol contains provisions for noncompliance, ranging from the
provision of technical and financial assistance to trade sanctions
in ozone depleting substances, which will be widened to include
HFCs.
The original aim of the Montreal Protocol was to stop the depletion
of the ozone layer, which shields the planet from ultraviolet rays
linked to skin cancer and other conditions.
That effort cost $3.5 billion over 25 years, said Stephen Olivier
Andersen, the director of research at Washington-based think tank
Institute for Governance and Sustainable Development. Scientists say
it prevented 2 million cases of skin cancer.
(Additional reporting by Lesley Wroughton; Writing by Katharine
Houreld; Editing by Jeremy Gaunt)
[© 2016 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
Copyright 2016 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. |