| 
		San Francisco lawsuit, NYC law highlight 
		global risks for Airbnb 
		 Send a link to a friend 
		
		 [October 21, 2016] 
		By Heather Somerville and Tina Bellon 
 SAN FRANCISCO/BERLIN (Reuters) - Airbnb, 
		the online lodging service that investors now believe is worth $30 
		billion, faces a reckoning.
 
 In eight years of torrid growth, the company has often clashed with 
		local public officials seeking to minimize the impact of short-term 
		rentals on neighborhoods and urban housing markets. Now, those simmering 
		tensions are starting to boil.
 
 The New York state legislature has passed regulations that Airbnb says 
		could seriously damage its business in New York City, the company's 
		largest U.S. market; Governor Andrew Cuomo has until Oct. 29 to decide 
		whether it will become law. The German capital of Berlin recently passed 
		a law banning most short-term rentals, and Barcelona and Amsterdam are 
		imposing steep fines for listings that violate laws there.
 
 Ground zero for Airbnb’s fight against tightening regulations is its 
		home of San Francisco, where the company has sued to block a new 
		requirement that it reject booking fees from property owners who have 
		not registered with the city.
 
 The case is a crucial test of Airbnb’s business model. The company 
		argues it cannot legally be held responsible for how landlords use its 
		platform. If it is required to enforce local laws on short-term rentals, 
		that could drastically reduce listings - and revenue - in some of its 
		biggest markets.
 
 Other cities looking to rein in Airbnb are watching the proceedings and 
		looking to the city's law as a potential model, said James Emery, deputy 
		city attorney of San Francisco.
 
		 
		"Throughout the country, people representing cities have called me to 
		ask what's going on with the litigation," he said.
 Airbnb's legal argument relies on a 20-year-old statute designed to 
		protect free speech online, known as Section 230 of the Communications 
		Decency Act. The company asserts in its lawsuit that San Francisco 
		"impermissibly treats Airbnb as the publisher or speaker of third-party 
		content" when it is merely a platform for communications between 
		property owners and guests.
 
 Other online marketplaces - such as Amazon <AMZN.O>, eBay <EBAY.O>, and 
		Craigslist – have cited the same law to shield themselves from liability 
		for any improper transactions among users of their services.
 
 In the San Francisco case, U.S. District Judge James Donato said at an 
		Oct. 6 hearing he wasn't "seeing the link" between free speech 
		protections and San Francisco's short-term rental regulations. Donato is 
		expected to issue a ruling soon.
 
 Airbnb has also sued the Southern California city of Anaheim, home to 
		the Disneyland theme park, and the nearby beach city of Santa Monica, 
		over regulations that the company contends are illegal.
 
 'ILLEGAL' BUSINESS MODEL
 
 Airbnb takes a cut of the revenue when a room or a home is booked and 
		charges a service fee to guests. The company says it helps communities 
		by enabling middle-class families to make extra money.
 
 It also points to agreements with officials in nearly 200 locales around 
		the world, mostly for tax collection and in some cases for broader 
		short-term rental regulation.
 
 Critics counter that, in popular tourist destinations, Airbnb takes 
		affordable housing off the market, drives up home prices and disrupts 
		neighborhoods with streams of transient visitors.
 
 As regulatory threats loom, Airbnb on Wednesday announced it would 
		create an online registration system for property owners and automate 
		the enforcement of Airbnb's existing rules in New York and San 
		Francisco, which limit operators to a single listing of an entire 
		residence.
 
		
		 
		New York Assemblywoman Linda Rosenthal, sponsor of the New York 
		legislation, was unimpressed by Airbnb’s announcement.
 "It's preposterous. Maybe half their listings are illegal" in New York 
		City, she said. "It's part-and-parcel of the business model.”
 
 Existing New York state law bars most urban apartment-dwellers from 
		renting out their units for less than 30 days if they are not present.
 
 The law recently passed by the state legislature would bar even 
		advertising a rental that violates that existing law, which could help 
		regulators crack down on Airbnb itself in addition to the users of its 
		service.
 
 [to top of second column]
 | 
            
			 
            
			A 3D printed people's models are seen in front of a displayed Airbnb 
			logo in this illustration taken, June 8, 2016. REUTERS/Dado 
			Ruvic/Illustration 
            
			 
			Airbnb has said it will sue New York state if the governor enacts 
			the law. The company said it has taken down nearly 3,000 illegal 
			listings in New York City over the past year, and reports 44,622 
			total listings in the city as of Sept. 1. 
			BATTLE IN BERLIN
 In Berlin, Airbnb is fighting a city demand that it turn over 
			information to help enforce a new law imposing fines of up $110,000 
			on people renting out more than 50 percent of their homes for less 
			than two months - among the strictest regulations worldwide.
 
 Airbnb is "confident it would find a favorable agreement" with the 
			city," said Peter Huntingford, Airbnb head of public affairs for 
			Europe.
 
 But with the city intent on collecting data and Airbnb intent on 
			refusing, another legal battle looms.
 
 "If Airbnb intends to risk a trial, we are prepared to walk down 
			that path,” said Martin Pallgen, a Berlin Senate spokesman.
 
 In Barcelona, Airbnb's third-largest market in Europe, the city is 
			imposing fines that exceed $65,000 for listings without proper 
			licenses. Amsterdam city officials in April started scraping data 
			from Airbnb and other short-term rental websites to root out illegal 
			hosts because Airbnb will not turn over details on violators.
 
 In its Wednesday announcement, Airbnb put forward what the company's 
			head of global policy and public affairs, Chris Lehane, called a 
			"comprehensive regulatory strategy" targeted at "rooting out bad 
			actors."
 
 But the new proposals stopped short of any commitments to share 
			information or enforce bans on short-term rental operators, which 
			many cities say is crucial for effective regulation.
 
			
			 
			RISING RISKS
 Critics contend that a large portion of Airbnb listings are offered 
			by commercial operators with multiple properties who are essentially 
			running illegal hotels. The company, they argue, has effectively 
			turned many residential neighborhoods into tourist zones.
 
			In Los Angeles, a study by the pro-labor Los Angeles Alliance for a 
			New Economy found that property owners with two or more listings 
			generated 44 percent of all Airbnb revenue in Los Angeles.
 Airbnb, in a statement, disputed that conclusion and called the 
			group's analysis "misleading."
 
 In New York City, the state Attorney General found that, between 
			2010 and 2014, more than 300,000 Airbnb reservations violated the 
			law, representing about $304 million in booking revenue, with about 
			$40 million of that going to Airbnb.
 
 Public officials need to prioritize the rights of full-time 
			residents over landlords and visitors, said Rosenthal, the New York 
			Assemblywoman.
 
 "I represent New Yorkers," she said. "I don't represent tourists, 
			and my responsibility is not to protect their cheap deal at the 
			expense of New Yorkers."
 
 (Reporting by Heather Somerville in San Fancisco and Tina Bellon in 
			Berlin. Additional reporting by Dan Levine.; Editing by Jonathan 
			Weber and Brian Thevenot)
 
			[© 2016 Thomson Reuters. All rights 
			reserved.] Copyright 2016 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, 
			broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. 
			
			
			 |