| 
		Trump's war chest one of smallest in 
		recent presidential campaigns 
		 Send a link to a friend 
		
		 [October 21, 2016] 
		By Ginger Gibson and Grant Smith 
 WASHINGTON/NEW YORK (Reuters) - Republican 
		Donald Trump could go down as the least well-funded presidential 
		candidate in recent campaigns - entering the final month of the election 
		still without the cash to match the level of staff and advertising that 
		has helped power the campaign of his Democratic rival Hillary Clinton.
 
 With less than three weeks until the election, it is too late for Trump 
		to amass the amount of cash he would need to unleash a spending assault 
		that might turn his hobbled campaign around. Through the end of 
		September, Trump raised a total of $163 million - a far cry from 
		Clinton’s $449 million.
 
 Trump, a New York real estate developer who has boasted about his 
		wealth, pledged to use millions of his personal assets to fund his 
		campaign. In addition to the $163 million raised, he put in $47.5 
		million during the primary and then added another $8.6 million.
 
 Trump’s fundraising deficit has resulted from a series of campaign 
		crises that made wealthy donors reluctant to contribute to his campaign 
		and reflects that he does not enjoy working the fundraising circuit or 
		calling large-dollar donors to ask them to write checks.
 
 That’s a big disadvantage for Trump. And it shows in how he has been 
		outspent trying to win the Nov. 8 election for the White House, 
		particularly in the two largest spending categories: staff and 
		television commercials.
 
		
		 
		When it comes to staff, Trump has spent $5 million, compared with 
		Clinton's spending of about $38 million.
 Trump had 168 people on his payroll in September, more than doubling the 
		82 he had on staff in July. Additionally, Trump spent $5 million on 
		field consultants, part-time workers who are not part of the main staff.
 
 Clinton had 815 people on her staff in September.
 
 On advertising, Trump has spent $48.7 million while Clinton has spent 
		$204 million - allowing her to blanket the airwaves with a deluge of 
		advertisements.
 
 It has also allowed Clinton to inject more money into states that have 
		become closer as Election Day nears. Earlier this week, Clinton’s 
		campaign announced it was spending an additional $2 million in Arizona, 
		a late-game decision to try to win a traditionally Republican state that 
		now appears within her grasp.
 
 Overall, Trump has spent about $190 million by the end of September, 
		compared with Clinton's $401 million.
 
 Trump and Clinton can collect donations up to $5,400 from a single 
		individual, but can also collect larger checks that are then divided 
		between the campaign and joint fundraisers with the national and state 
		parties.
 
 [to top of second column]
 | 
            
			 
            
			Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump holds a campaign rally 
			in Delaware, Ohio, U.S. October 20, 2016. REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst 
            
			 
			The funds that candidates raise for the national and state political 
			parties are still used for the common effort of hiring staff and 
			getting voters to turn out to the polls. But those funds cannot be 
			used in the most direct parts of running a campaign, like buying 
			television ads or hiring staff that report to the campaign manager.
 Trump’s campaign struggled to get organized and build out the 
			infrastructure that is needed to be competitive in the key 
			battleground states. Instead, Trump has been dependent on the 
			infrastructure built by the Republican Party.
 
 Trump has raised $244 million through joint fundraising committees 
			with the national parties, of which he got $71 million.
 
 By comparison, Clinton has raised $415 million through joint 
			fundraisers, of which $117 million went to her campaign.
 
 Since 2008, major party presidential candidates have stopped 
			accepting public funding for their general election campaigns - 
			which placed limits on the amount a candidate could raise and spend.
 
 But even the last candidate to accept public funds, Senator John 
			McCain in 2008, raised more that year than Trump did this election. 
			McCain raised more than $300 million. That same year, Barack Obama, 
			in his first presidential race, raised $607 million.
 
 In 2012, Mitt Romney raised more than $337 million at this point in 
			the campaign. And Obama had raised $564 million.
 
 (Reporting by Ginger Gibson in Washington and Grant Smith in New 
			York; Editing by Leslie Adler)
 
			[© 2016 Thomson Reuters. All rights 
			reserved.] Copyright 2016 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, 
			broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. 
			
			 
			
			
			 |