| 
		Trump seeks to bar personal conduct 
		claims from Trump University trial 
		 Send a link to a friend 
		
		 [October 22, 2016] 
		By Dan Levine 
 SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) - Donald Trump's 
		attorneys asked a U.S. judge to bar accusations about his personal 
		conduct that have arisen during the presidential election campaign, 
		which would include allegations of sexual misconduct, from the upcoming 
		civil trial over Trump University.
 
 Students at Trump University claim they were defrauded by its real 
		estate seminars.
 
 Trump, the Republican nominee for president, has faced allegations from 
		women that he inappropriately touched them. Trump denied those 
		accusations.
 
 In a court filing late on Thursday, attorneys for Trump said evidence 
		and statements from the election campaign should be barred from trial 
		because they could unfairly prejudice the jury. The trial is set to 
		begin on Nov. 28.
 
 Evidence including Trump's campaign speeches, tweets, his tax issues and 
		controversy over his personal charity should not be considered by 
		jurors, the filing said. All audio and video recordings publicized 
		during the campaign should also be barred, the filing said, along with 
		evidence about Trump's beauty pageants, casinos and corporate 
		bankruptcies.
 
		
		 
		"Before trial begins in this case, prospective members of the jury will 
		have the opportunity to cast their vote for president," Trump's lawyers 
		wrote. "It is in the ballot box where they are free to judge Mr. Trump 
		based on all this and more."
 A spokeswoman for the plaintiffs declined to comment.
 
 Trump's lawyers had argued that the lawsuit, filed in 2013 in a San 
		Diego federal court, should be dismissed because the New York real 
		estate mogul, while personally involved in developing the concept and 
		curriculum, relied on others to manage Trump University by the time the 
		plaintiffs purchased seminars.
 
 [to top of second column]
 | 
            
			 
            
			Republican U.S. presidential nominee Donald Trump reacts during the 
			third and final debate with Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton (not 
			pictured) at UNLV in Las Vegas, Nevada, U.S., October 19, 2016. 
			REUTERS/Rick Wilking 
             
			Trump set off an uproar earlier this year when he accused the judge 
			overseeing the case, U.S. District Judge Gonzalo Curiel, of being 
			biased against him because of the Trump's pledge to build a border 
			wall between the United States and Mexico. Curiel was born in 
			Indiana and is of Mexican descent.
 Trump is trailing in the polls to Democrat Hillary Clinton with less 
			than three weeks until Election Day.
 
 Trump's lawyers also asked Curiel to exclude evidence about 
			students' finances from the trial, saying the affordability of Trump 
			University was not relevant to the trial.
 
 Lawyers for the students asked in separate court filings to bar 
			other evidence, including testimonials attesting to the value of the 
			seminars, partly because they are irrelevant to whether Trump 
			University misrepresented the qualifications of its instructors.
 
 (Reporting by Dan Levine; Editing by Cynthia Osterman)
 
			[© 2016 Thomson Reuters. All rights 
			reserved.] Copyright 2016 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, 
			broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. 
			
			 |