Negative tone of White House race sours
young voters
Send a link to a friend
[October 25, 2016]
By Scott Malone
BOSTON (Reuters) - The exceptionally
negative tone of this year's race for the White House is souring young
Americans, turning some away from the democratic process just as the
millennial generation has become as large a potential bloc of voters as
the baby boomers.
Reuters/Ipsos polling shows that Americans aged 18 to 34 are slightly
less likely to vote for president this year than their comparably aged
peers were in 2012. Some political scientists worry that this election
could scar a generation of voters, making them less likely to cast
ballots in the future.
Young Americans on the left and right have found reasons to be
dissatisfied with their choices this year. Senator Bernie Sanders had an
enthusiastic following of younger people before he lost the Democratic
primary race to former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. On the
Republican side, some are unwilling to vote for Donald Trump, citing the
New York businessman's sometimes insulting rhetoric on women, minorities
and immigrants.
Brandon Epstein, who turned 18 on Monday, had looked forward earlier in
the year to casting his first vote for Sanders. Now, the resident of
suburban Suffolk County, New York, plans to sit out the vote on Election
Day, Nov. 8.
![](http://archives.lincolndailynews.com/2016/Oct/25/images/ads/current/atlanta_bank_sda_SHI_2016.png)
"It's because of the selection of the candidates. I find them to be not
just sub-par, but unusually sub-par," said Epstein, a student at the
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, in Cambridge, Massachusetts.
"Something's gone terribly wrong."
That sentiment is broadly reflected in poll data that show that young
Americans are less enthusiastic about their choices in November than
they were four years ago when Democratic President Barack Obama faced a
re-election challenge from Republican Mitt Romney.
Some 52.2 percent of respondents aged 18 to 34 told Reuters/Ipsos they
were certain or almost certain to vote, compared with 56.1 percent who
reported that level of certainty at the same point in 2012.
The national tracking poll was conducted online in English in all 50
states. It included 3,088 people between 18-34 years old who took the
survey from Oct. 1 to Oct. 17, and 2,141 18-34 year olds who took the
poll on the same days in 2012. It has a credibility interval, a measure
of accuracy, of 2 percentage points for both groups.
'DEEP CYNICISM'
For at least the past half century, young Americans have voted at lower
rates than their elders. But this year's decline in enthusiasm is of
particular concern because it comes as the millennial generation -
people born from 1981 through 1997 - has become as large a bloc of
eligible voters as the baby boomers - born between 1946 and 1964. Each
group's number of eligible voters is approaching 70 million people,
according to the Pew Research Center.
![](http://archives.lincolndailynews.com/2016/Aug/26/images/ads/current/directory_buttons.png)
[to top of second column] |
![](../images/102516pics/news_z43.jpg)
President Barack Obama
speaks to an overflow crowd outside a rally in support of Hillary
Clinton's campaign in Las Vegas, Nevada, U.S. on October 23, 2016.
REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque/File Photo
![](../images/ads/current/richardson_lda_090916.png)
"This generation has never trusted the government, Wall Street or
the media less," John Della Volpe, director of polling at Harvard
University's Institute of Politics, said of the millennials. "That's
likely to result in turnout of less than 50 percent and of those who
do turn out, there is still a deep cynicism regarding the impact of
their vote, whether or not it will make a difference."
The projected low turnout is a particular concern given recent
research showing how important habit is in encouraging voter
participation. Put simply, a person who votes in one election is
about 10 percent more likely to vote in the next than an eligible
voter who opted to stay home, said Alexander Coppock, an assistant
professor of political science at Yale University.
"If you extend that logic, if you have an election that fails to
turn people on to voting, you'd expect that you wouldn't get that
cumulative effect," said Coppock, whose article "Is Voting Habit
Forming?" was published in this month's issue of the American
Journal for Political Science.
However, not all young voters unhappy with their choices will be
staying home. Some plan to cast a ballot anyway, even if only in
protest, rather than sitting out.
That group includes Cameron Khansarinia, a 20-year-old vice
president of the Harvard Republican Club, who said he would cast a
ballot even though he opposed Trump.
![](http://archives.lincolndailynews.com/2016/Oct/25/images/ads/current/mb_heating_quarter_FHI_2016.png)
"I will definitely vote, I just don't know if I will be writing
someone in or voting for (Libertarian) Gary Johnson or even voting
for Hillary Clinton when it gets down to it," said Khansarinia, who
is registered to vote in heavily Democratic California. "Once this
is over, come Nov. 9, we will need people here to rebuild the
party."
(Reporting by Scott Malone; Editing by Frances Kerry)
[© 2016 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
Copyright 2016 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. |