| 
			
			 Pentagon spending rose to $57 million over the past year from $9 
			million in 2008 - an increase driven both by volume and by price 
			hikes that had a bigger bite on prescriptions filled at retail 
			pharmacies, according to the previously unreported data. 
 The Pentagon gets a government discount on EpiPens dispensed at 
			military treatment facilities and by mail order. But nearly half of 
			its spending was at retail pharmacies where it most recently paid an 
			average of $509 for EpiPen and $528 for EpiPen Jr two-packs - three 
			times higher than its discounted rate, the data shows.
 
 That may change. Both the Pentagon and Mylan told Reuters that 
			discussions are underway that could extend the military discount to 
			EpiPens filled at retail pharmacies through the use of rebates.
 
 Mylan spokeswoman Nina Devlin declined to comment on the specific 
			Department of Defense spending. She said in an emailed statement 
			that talks were underway to address "any questions or concerns from 
			the agency."
 
 She declined to say if any repayment was on the table.
 
			
			 
			A Reuters analysis of the data estimated a difference of about $54 
			million between what the agency paid for EpiPens at retail 
			pharmacies from 2009 through 2016 and what it would have paid at 
			military clinics.
 Mylan Chief Executive Officer Heather Bresch has drawn public 
			scrutiny for raising the U.S. list price on a pack of two injectors 
			nearly six-fold to $600 since 2008.
 
 Affordability has become a bigger issue with the increased diagnosis 
			and awareness of food allergies. Families who rely on EpiPens to 
			safeguard their children against possibly fatal allergic reactions 
			often purchase several to carry with them, keep at school and with 
			caregivers.
 
 In response to the criticism, Mylan is providing more families with 
			coupons to pay for EpiPens and plans to market a half-price version. 
			The drugmaker also agreed to pay $465 million to settle questions 
			over whether the Medicaid program for the poor overpaid because 
			EpiPens were classified as a generic treatment, a category that 
			allows manufacturers to give smaller rebates to government agencies.
 
 While Medicaid providers don't take issue with the increased use of 
			EpiPens, they have bristled over the price hikes.
 
 "The rate of increases in their cost is not justifiable," said Dr. 
			J. Mario Molina, chief executive of Molina Healthcare, which runs 
			Medicaid plans in California and 11 other states.
 
 THE FULL PICTURE
 
 The impact of Mylan's price hikes on government health programs, 
			such as Medicaid, has been obscured by highly complex pharmaceutical 
			pricing and opaque negotiations.
 
 The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, as well as several 
			large state Medicaid programs, have released partial details on 
			their spending, saying full information on rebates is confidential 
			under U.S. law. Without such details, it is impossible to discern 
			what price an agency is paying for EpiPen.
 
 At Reuters' request, the Defense Department provided the most 
			comprehensive picture of EpiPen spending by a government agency, 
			including fiscal year expenditures since 2008, average price per 
			pack and the number of prescriptions filled by type of dispensing 
			location for all EpiPens obtained by military service members, their 
			families and retirees.
 
			
            [to top of second column] | 
 
			The department's spending on EpiPens has increased fivefold since 
			2008, far outpacing the 130 percent growth in prescriptions, the 
			data shows.
 Defense spending on the injectors at retail pharmacies - which 
			accounted for 53,500 of 226,000 EpiPen prescriptions for the last 
			fiscal year that ended Sept. 30 - has grown more than tenfold, to 
			$28 million from $2.4 million in 2008.
 
 While EpiPen spending represents a fraction of a percent of the 
			Defense Department's $49 billion annual healthcare budget, the data 
			illustrates the premium it was paying for EpiPens at retail outlets.
 
 "Lawmakers would not be terribly happy to hear that DoD is paying 
			more at retail," said Brian Bruen, a drug economics researcher at 
			George Washington University's Milken Institute School of Public 
			Health.
 
			DISCOUNT BY DEFINITION
 The Defense Department and Department of Veterans Affairs, typically 
			pay among the lowest drug prices in the country because of discounts 
			mandated by law, as well as rebates negotiated with drugmakers, 
			Bruen said.
 
 Indeed, the Pentagon has paid $173 for an EpiPen two-pack filled 
			through mail order and $169 at military facilities in fiscal year 
			2016.
 
 A key factor for government discounts is whether a drug is patent 
			protected and has market exclusivity, or it is a generic, made 
			cheaper by competition.
 
 The EpiPen, which packages a generic allergy antidote in a patented, 
			easy-to-use injector, is somewhat of a hybrid.
 
 For the Defense Department, pharmaceutical companies pay rebates on 
			brand name drugs dispensed by retail pharmacies, reducing the final 
			cost to the agency's discounted rate.
 
			
			 
			  
			EpiPen's classification as a generic drug prevents it from receiving 
			mandated rebates. Mylan provided documentation it said showed the 
			military had accepted the generic classification for EpiPen in 2008.
 Under Mylan's settlement with the federal government, Medicaid will 
			classify EpiPen as a branded drug, Devlin said. That will qualify 
			Medicaid for a 23 percent rebate, up from the 13 percent it gets on 
			generics. Any price hikes will be capped at the inflation rate, a 
			protection not afforded generic drug purchases.
 
 "It was always our intention that the reclassification would benefit 
			all government agencies impacted by the classification, including 
			the VA and Tricare (Defense) programs," Devlin said.
 
 (Additional reporting by Deena Beasley in Los Angeles; Editing by 
			Michele Gershberg and Lisa Girion)
 
			[© 2016 Thomson Reuters. All rights 
				reserved.] Copyright 2016 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, 
			broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. |