Clinton holds lead, but pollsters say
their job is harder
Send a link to a friend
[October 28, 2016]
By Scott Malone
BOSTON (Reuters) - Many opinion polls show
Democrat Hillary Clinton leading Republican Donald Trump in a tight race
for the Nov. 8 U.S. presidential election, but any one of four factors
may make the outcome harder to predict.
Among the challenges for pollsters: The historic unpopularity of both
candidates, the potential Election Day voter response to the polls
themselves, the growing abandonment of landlines for cellphones, and the
rise of online polling.
Some high-profile stumbles worldwide - including opinion polls that
missed Colombia's Oct. 2 rejection of a peace deal - underscore how
technological, social and cultural shifts have made polling more
difficult than ever.
An average of polls compiled by RealClearPolitics.com shows former
Secretary of State Clinton beating Trump, a businessman, by 5.4
percentage points. Highlighting the difficulties, the range varies from
plus-13 for Clinton to a straight tie.
Trump has said the election is rigged against him and this week, in a
Reuters interview, he accused media organizations of tilting the polls
deliberately, but he has yet to offer any widely accepted evidence to
back up these claims.
![](http://archives.lincolndailynews.com/2016/Oct/28/images/ads/current/farmers_grain_sda_Ffarm_daily_2015.png)
Voter turnout in the last few presidential elections has been about 60
percent. But given both candidates' low overall popularity, turnout this
year may fall to as low as 52 percent, said Cliff Zukin, a professor
emeritus of political science at New Jersey's Rutgers University and a
former president of the American Association for Public Opinion
Research.
That makes it hard to guess who might stay home.
"It's always been difficult to simulate a likely electorate and I think
that's harder to do in 2016," Zukin said.
POLLING MAY AFFECT TURNOUT
A second pitfall is the effect of the polling itself on voters.
Sociologists believe polls can weaken projected winners by making their
supporters more confident of the outcome and, therefore, less likely to
vote.
The percentage of Trump supporters who expect him to win has dropped to
49 percent in a Reuters/Ipsos poll conducted from Oct. 20-24, down from
74 percent from Sept. 16-20. Clinton supporters' confidence rose at the
same time.
If that leads to a higher turnout of Trump supporters than of Clinton
supporters, it might affect the election outcome.
Pollsters caution, however, that the effect of polls on the electorate
can only go so far.
"If it were showing Clinton up by 2 points, then it's certainly possible
that it would be within the margin of error that Trump might win," said
Douglas Schwartz, director of the Quinnipiac University Poll.
"But if you're finding that all of these high-quality polls are showing
Clinton consistently ahead, then I think you can trust them," he said.
CELLPHONES AN ISSUE
One of the biggest factors in polling today is the prevalence of
cellphones. About half of Americans have only a cellphone and no
landline, according to Federal Communications Commission data, more than
double the number who were wireless-only in 2010.
![](http://archives.lincolndailynews.com/2016/Aug/26/images/ads/current/directory_buttons.png)
This makes it harder and more expensive for pollsters to gather a truly
random sample of opinions because U.S. law prohibits computerized
auto-dialing (also known as robocalls) to cellphones and there is no
central directory for cellphones.
Polling cellphones can costs 30 to 50 percent more than polling land
lines due to requirements that the numbers be dialed manually, according
to Pew Research Center estimates. This has led polling outfits to
generally rely on lower sample sizes to come up with results.
[to top of second column] |
![](../images/102816pics/news_t35.jpg)
Hillary Clinton poses for a picture with supporters at supporters
outside of an early voting center Greensboro, North Carolina.
REUTERS/Carlos Barria
![](../images/ads/current/richardson_lda_090916.png)
Calls to cellphones are also more easily screened by their users,
and as a result pollsters say they connect with just 10 percent of
people they try to contact, down from 80 percent a few decades ago.
But Courtney Kennedy, director of survey research at Pew said, "In
terms of data, the quality is better." Many respondents on
cellphones are young and racially diverse, she said.
ONLINE SURVEYS A FACTOR
Others, such as Reuters/Ipsos, conduct surveys online. This allows
them to reach large numbers of people at lower cost. But because
participants are volunteers in many cases, rather than selected at
random, segments of the electorate may be left out.
The lower or skewed response in both cellphone and online polls can
pose a challenge with pollsters having to adjust results to match
the real world. To accomplish this, they weight more heavily the
opinions of types of voters under-represented in their surveys.
Pollsters use population statistics, experience and intuition to do
this. For instance, if the proportion of men who respond to a survey
is lower than their proportion of the overall population, the
pollster will adjust the finding to try to even that out.
"Then you've built in an assumption that the males that didn't
respond are like the males that responded. And that's an unknowable
fact," said Robert Groves, provost of Georgetown University, a
social statistician and author of seven books on polling who served
as director of the U.S. Census Bureau from 2009 through 2012.
![](http://archives.lincolndailynews.com/2016/Oct/28/images/ads/current/dd_spec_BD_lda_wpic_2016.png)
But such modeling can work well in some cases.
A study by Columbia University statisticians, published in 2014 in
the International Journal of Forecasting, showed that a poll of
users of Microsoft Corp's Xbox gaming system could be used to
accurately predict the election's outcome.
The gamers were far younger, whiter and more male than the U.S.
electorate and predicted a sweeping victory for Republican Mitt
Romney in 2012. But when the results were weighted according to
voters who turned out in 2008, they predicted President Barack
Obama's 2012 re-election.
Getting the weightings right this time could be a tougher job
because Trump has attracted many supporters who historically have
voted erratically, or not at all.
"We can't apply 2008 and 2012 models to 2016," said Ashley Koning,
director of the Eagleton Center for Public Interest Polling at
Rutgers University.
(Reporting by Scott Malone; Additional reporting by Steve Holland in
Boynton Beach, Florida, and Maurice Tamman in New York; Editing by
Richard Valdmanis and Howard Goller)
[© 2016 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
Copyright 2016 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. |