| 
		Stanford sex assault case spurs get-tough 
		rape proposals 
		 Send a link to a friend 
		
		 [September 01, 2016] 
		By Sharon Bernstein 
 SACRAMENTO, Calif. (Reuters) - Former 
		Stanford University swimmer Brock Turner will be released on Friday 
		after serving three months for sexually assaulting an unconscious woman 
		near a fraternity party, a sentence that has ignited fierce debate over 
		the way California defines and punishes rape.
 
 Turner's sentence to months in county jail instead of years in state 
		prison stoked international outrage, leading California lawmakers to 
		call for mandatory prison time for sex assaults involving unconscious 
		victims, and expanding the state's definition of rape.
 
 But the proposed new laws, now on the desk of Democratic Governor Jerry 
		Brown, come as Democrats and Republicans alike are trying to move the 
		criminal justice system away from mandatory sentencing laws and other 
		get-tough measures that have contributed to crowded prisons and the 
		over-incarceration of poor and minority defendants.
 
 "When we broaden those criminal definitions, it can broaden the swath of 
		persons that can be criminalized," said Emily Austin, director of 
		advocacy for the California Coalition Against Sexual Assault, which 
		declined to take a position on the bills. "And how that works out in the 
		justice system can vary based on your race and class."
 
 The Turner case has become the focal point of growing international 
		outrage over campus rape. Many advocates say laws in California and 
		elsewhere offer outdated definitions of rape that are too lenient on 
		perpetrators if they or their victims have been drinking.
 
		
		 
		Crafting a solution has proven thorny.
 The criticism of Santa Clara County Superior Court Judge Aaron Persky's 
		sentence in the Turner case has been fierce, generating more than a 
		million signatures on an online petition calling for his ouster and 
		prompting a recall campaign. Since the sentencing, the judge, who 
		declined to comment for this story, has recused himself from a sexual 
		assault case and asked to hear only civil cases.
 
 LIMITING JUDICIAL DISCRETION
 
 The recall campaign and legislative responses have come under fire from 
		many public defenders, who represent defendants unable to afford legal 
		fees, and some judges, who say they limit judges' discretion when 
		handling cases.
 
 In the legislature, several lawmakers who support rolling back mandatory 
		sentencing sat out votes on the two bills. Brown, who has not said 
		whether he will sign them, is backing a ballot initiative to ease 
		mandatory sentences.
 
 Assembly member Cristina Garcia, whose bill expanding the definition of 
		rape is among those on Brown's desk, nonetheless cast a dissenting vote 
		on the mandatory sentencing bill.
 
 "We should not perpetuate practices that put an undue burden on 
		minorities and economically disadvantaged communities like minimum 
		mandatory sentences," Garcia said.
 
 [to top of second column]
 | 
            
			 
            
			A combination booking photos shows former Stanford University 
			student Brock Turner (L) on January 18, 2015 at the time of arrest 
			and after Turner was sentenced to six months in county jail for the 
			sexual assault of an unconscious woman, in Santa Clara County 
			Sheriff's booking photo (R) released on June 7, 2016. Courtesy Santa 
			Clara County Sheriff's Office/Handout via REUTERS 
            
			 
			A backer of the Persky recall campaign, the feminist group 
			Ultraviolet, also opposed it.
 The Turner case initially shot to prominence last year because the 
			defendant was a rising student athlete at Stanford. Turner, then 19, 
			was arrested after two students saw him outside of a fraternity 
			house on top of an unconscious woman.
 
 He was charged with sexual assault instead of rape because although 
			he digitally penetrated the woman, he did not have intercourse with 
			her, and California law does not define that as rape.
 
 A letter written by the victim, who remains anonymous, went viral 
			with a moving explanation of her ordeal.
 
 In June, Persky sentenced Turner to six months in a county jail and 
			three years probation, sparking outrage that intensified after 
			prosecutors released a letter written by Turner's father calling the 
			assault "20 minutes of action."
 
 Turner will be released on Friday after serving three months under 
			rules giving time off for factors including good behavior.
 
 Stanford law professor Michele Dauber, who started the campaign to 
			recall the judge, said while she generally opposes mandatory 
			sentencing, she believes Persky abused the discretion that the law 
			allowed him.
 
 Changing the law, said Assembly member Evan Low, who co-authored the 
			bill mandating prison time for sexually assaulting an unconscious 
			victim, would keep that from happening again.
 
 “Judge Persky's ruling was unjustifiable and morally wrong, however, 
			under current state law it was within his discretion," Low said.
 
 (Reporting by Sharon Bernstein; Editing by Bill Rigby)
 
			[© 2016 Thomson Reuters. All rights 
			reserved.] Copyright 2016 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, 
			broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. 
			
			 |