Investigators clear bribery allegations in Japan's 2020 bid
Send a link to a friend
[September 01, 2016]
By Minami Funakoshi
TOKYO (Reuters) - An independent panel
found that Tokyo's $2 million payment to a Singaporean consulting
firm in connection with its bid to host the Tokyo 2020 Games was
legitimate, its head said on Thursday.
The panel, commissioned by the Japanese Olympic Committee (JOC),
concluded in its report that the payments to Singaporean firm Black
Tidings were not a bribe.
Japan's hosting of the Summer Games has been mired in setbacks,
including an overhaul of the stadium design, which was abandoned in
response to public anger over soaring costs, and plagiarism
allegations over its original logo.
"I believe the suspicion of bribery by the bid team has been
cleared," said lawyer Yoshihisa Hayakawa, who headed the
investigation.
Tokyo bid team's executives had no knowledge of the link between Ian
Tan Tong Han, the head of Black Tidings, and Papa Massata Diack, the
son of disgraced former international athletics chief Lamine Diack,
the panel, comprised of two lawyers and a certified public
accountant, concluded.
Diack is facing charges in France for corruption at the IAAF,
athletics' governing body, the panel concluded.
While the $2 million fee is double the average the Tokyo bid team
paid to other such consultants, Tan, a successful lobbyist, deserved
the fee, the panel found in its report.
The investigators were unable to speak with Tan, Diack or his son,
Papa Massata Diack, Hayakawa said. The team conducted hearings with
members of the bid team and analyzed relevant documents, the report
said.
[to top of second column] |
Tokyo 2020 Emblems Selection Committee Chairperson Ryohei Miyata (R)
and committee member Sadaharu Oh present the winning design of the
Tokyo 2020 Olympic Games and Paralympic Games during its unveiling
ceremony in Tokyo, Japan April 25, 2016. REUTERS/Thomas Peter
The investigation panel does not know exactly how Tan spent the
money or whether he transferred it to Diack or his son, Hayakawa
added.
Even if money was transferred from Tan to Diack, such transfers
would not be considered bribery as the bid team was not aware of the
transfer or the tie between the two.
(Editing by Angus MacSwan)
[© 2016 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
Copyright 2016 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
|