| 
			Investigators clear bribery allegations in Japan's 2020 bid 
		 Send a link to a friend 
			
			 [September 01, 2016] 
			By Minami Funakoshi 
 TOKYO (Reuters) - An independent panel 
			found that Tokyo's $2 million payment to a Singaporean consulting 
			firm in connection with its bid to host the Tokyo 2020 Games was 
			legitimate, its head said on Thursday.
 
 The panel, commissioned by the Japanese Olympic Committee (JOC), 
			concluded in its report that the payments to Singaporean firm Black 
			Tidings were not a bribe.
 
 Japan's hosting of the Summer Games has been mired in setbacks, 
			including an overhaul of the stadium design, which was abandoned in 
			response to public anger over soaring costs, and plagiarism 
			allegations over its original logo.
 
 "I believe the suspicion of bribery by the bid team has been 
			cleared," said lawyer Yoshihisa Hayakawa, who headed the 
			investigation.
 
 Tokyo bid team's executives had no knowledge of the link between Ian 
			Tan Tong Han, the head of Black Tidings, and Papa Massata Diack, the 
			son of disgraced former international athletics chief Lamine Diack, 
			the panel, comprised of two lawyers and a certified public 
			accountant, concluded.
 
			 Diack is facing charges in France for corruption at the IAAF, 
			athletics' governing body, the panel concluded.
 While the $2 million fee is double the average the Tokyo bid team 
			paid to other such consultants, Tan, a successful lobbyist, deserved 
			the fee, the panel found in its report.
 
 The investigators were unable to speak with Tan, Diack or his son, 
			Papa Massata Diack, Hayakawa said. The team conducted hearings with 
			members of the bid team and analyzed relevant documents, the report 
			said.
 
            [to top of second column] | 
            
			 
            
			Tokyo 2020 Emblems Selection Committee Chairperson Ryohei Miyata (R) 
			and committee member Sadaharu Oh present the winning design of the 
			Tokyo 2020 Olympic Games and Paralympic Games during its unveiling 
			ceremony in Tokyo, Japan April 25, 2016. REUTERS/Thomas Peter 
            
			 
			The investigation panel does not know exactly how Tan spent the 
			money or whether he transferred it to Diack or his son, Hayakawa 
			added.
 Even if money was transferred from Tan to Diack, such transfers 
			would not be considered bribery as the bid team was not aware of the 
			transfer or the tie between the two.
 
 (Editing by Angus MacSwan)
 
			[© 2016 Thomson Reuters. All rights 
			reserved.] Copyright 2016 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, 
			broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. 
			
			 |