| 
		Curious radio signal stirs talk of 
		extraterrestrials 
		 Send a link to a friend 
		
		 [September 03, 2016] 
		By Irene Klotz 
 CAPE CANAVERAL, Fla. (Reuters) - A curious 
		radio signal picked up by a Russian telescope is probably not a 
		transmission from an extraterrestrial civilization, but astronomers in 
		California are taking a second look anyway, the SETI Institute said on 
		Tuesday.
 
 A group of Russian astronomers last year detected what appeared to be a 
		non-naturally occurring radio signal in the general location of a star 
		system 94 light-years from Earth.
 
 Their findings emerged after Italian researcher Claudio Maccone, who 
		chairs the International Academy of Astronautics committee on the Search 
		for Extraterrestrial Intelligence, or SETI, told colleagues of a 
		presentation he heard about the signal, said Seth Shostak, a director at 
		the SETI Institute.
 
 "I don't think we're taking it terribly seriously," Shostak said. "The 
		Russians looked in this direction 39 times, and as best we can tell they 
		found it once."
 
 Most likely, the radio signal was caused by terrestrial interference or 
		a satellite, a common occurrence, Shostak told Reuters.
 
 If the Russians thought they had a serious signal from ET, he said, they 
		also likely would have disclosed it sooner.
 
 "They didn't say anything about it for more than year. If we had found a 
		signal, we'd check it out and call up other astronomers to check it out 
		as well," Shostak said.
 
 [to top of second column]
 | 
            
             
			Nevertheless, SETI astronomers have spent the last two nights using 
			an array of radio telescopes in California to study the suspect 
			star, HD 164595, which has one known planet in orbit.
 The planet is about the size of Neptune, but circles its star far 
			closer than Mercury orbits the sun. HD 164595 could have other 
			planets in orbit that are more suitably positioned for water, which 
			is believed to be necessary for life.
 
 So far, though, astronomers have not detected any unusual signals 
			from the star, Shostak said.
 
			 
			"We have to be very careful not to get cynical about false alarms," 
			he said. "It's easy to say 'Aw man, it's just another case of 
			interference,' but that risks not paying attention when you should."
 (Reporting by Irene Klotz; Editing by Daniel Wallis and Frances 
			Kerry)
 
			[© 2016 Thomson Reuters. All rights 
			reserved.] Copyright 2016 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, 
			broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. |