| 
		Company agrees to temporarily halt some 
		North Dakota pipeline work 
		 Send a link to a friend 
		
		 [September 07, 2016] 
		By Julia Harte 
 WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A Native American 
		tribal chairman said his people were "disappointed" that a company 
		agreed on Tuesday to temporarily halt construction of an oil pipeline 
		only in some but not all parts of North Dakota where the tribe says it 
		has sacred sites.
 
 After violent clashes over the weekend between protesters and security 
		officers near the construction site, the Standing Rock Sioux tribe and a 
		neighboring Native American tribe had asked the U.S. District Court for 
		the District of Columbia on Sunday for a temporary restraining order 
		against Dakota Access, the company building the pipeline.
 
 U.S. Judge James Boasberg said on Tuesday he had granted in part and 
		denied in part the temporary restraining order, and that he would decide 
		by Friday whether to grant the tribes' larger challenge to the pipeline, 
		which would require the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to withdraw permits 
		for the project.
 
 A group of firms led by Energy Transfer Partners <ETP.N> is building the 
		1,100-mile (1,770-km) pipeline. The $3.7 billion project would be the 
		first to bring crude oil from Bakken shale, a vast oil formation in 
		North Dakota, directly to refineries in the U.S. Gulf Coast.
 
		
		 
		Standing Rock Sioux Tribal Chairman David Archambault II said in a 
		statement the ruling puts the tribe's "sacred places at further risk of 
		ruin and desecration."
 Dakota Access agreed to halt activity until Friday in an area 
		representing about half the total space requested in the tribes' 
		temporary restraining order.
 
 It did not include ancient burial and prayer sites recently discovered 
		by a historic preservation officer for the tribe, Jan Hasselman, an 
		attorney for the Standing Rock Sioux, told a news conference on Tuesday.
 
 Hasselman said the tribe would now wait for Boasberg's decision on 
		Friday and pursue appeals if the judge rules against the tribe.
 
 [to top of second column]
 | 
            
			 
            
			Protesters hold signs outside the U.S. District Court in Washington, 
			where a hearing was being held to decide whether to halt 
			construction of an oil pipeline in parts of North Dakota where a 
			Native American tribe says it has ancient burial and prayer sites, 
			September 6, 2016. REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque 
            
			 
			Dakota Access accused the Standing Rock Sioux during Tuesday's 
			hearing of inciting the pipeline's opponents to break the law. The 
			company's lawyers could not immediately be reached for comment after 
			the ruling.
 Saturday's protests were triggered, the tribes said, when the 
			pipeline company used bulldozers to destroy sacred tribal sites 
			whose locations had been identified in court documents filed on 
			Friday.
 
 Tomas Alejo, who participated in Saturday's demonstrations, said in 
			an interview that the security officers had formed a "barricade" 
			with guard dogs to prevent protesters from accessing the bulldozers, 
			and that the dogs bit children and tribal elders.
 
 Dakota Access said in its reply to the requested restraining order 
			that the protesters "stampeded" the construction area and attacked 
			the dogs and security officers with makeshift weapons, and that the 
			bulldozers did not destroy important historical sites.
 
 (Reporting by Julia Harte and Mohammad Zargham in Washington; 
			Editing by Frances Kerry and Matthew Lewis)
 
			[© 2016 Thomson Reuters. All rights 
			reserved.] Copyright 2016 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, 
			broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. 
			
			 |