| 
						
						
						 Playboy 
						wins copyright battle over web links to its images 
   Send a link to a friend 
						
						[September 09, 2016]   
						By Julia Fioretti 
						BRUSSELS (Reuters) - 
						Playboy won a legal fight to stop a website from posting 
						links to images published without permission on 
						Thursday, a decision which could have far wider 
						consequences across the Internet. | 
			
            | 
				
				 The European Union's top court decided that posting such 
				links infringes copyright when the website doing it is seeking 
				to profit from pictures published without permission. 
 Sanoma, Playboy's Dutch publisher had sought to get website 
				GeenStijl, which describes itself as one of the most visited 
				news websites in the Netherlands, to remove a web link to photos 
				of a TV celebrity Britt Dekker which were posted illegally.
 
 "It is undisputed that GS Media (which owns GreenStijl)provided 
				the hyperlinks to the files containing the photos for profit and 
				that Sanoma had not authorised the publication of those photos 
				on the internet," the Luxembourg-based Court of Justice of the 
				European Union (ECJ) said in a statement.
 
 "When hyperlinks are posted for profit, it may be expected that 
				the person who posted such a link should carry out the checks 
				necessary to ensure that the work concerned is not illegally 
				published."
 
				
				 GS Media said the ruling was a blow to press freedom.
 "If commercial media companies - such as GeenStijl - can no 
				longer freely and fearlessly hyperlink it will be difficult to 
				report on newsworthy new questions, leaked information and 
				internal struggles and unsecure networks in large companies," it 
				said on GeenStijl's website.
 
 The issue of hyperlinking to photos and articles has become a 
				divisive issue with the spread of the internet. Content owners 
				argue that the ease with which people can post links to 
				copyrighted material on the internet infringes their rights 
				while internet users say restricting people's ability to post 
				links goes against the principle of freedom of information.
 
			[to top of second column] | 
            
			 
			Creativity Works, an association representing publishers, film and 
			music producers, said: "Taking action against illegal sites is not 
			about preventing access to creative content but to protect consumers 
			and stop pirates who do not contribute to Europe’s cultural 
			diversity while making a business out of exploiting content that's 
			not theirs." 
			The ECJ recognised that the internet "is of particular importance to 
			freedom of expression and of information and that hyperlinks 
			contribute to its sound operation and to the exchange of opinions 
			and information as well."
 Therefore it could be difficult for individuals posting such links 
			to know if they are doing it legally, the court said.
 
 However, if a person should have been aware because the owner 
			informed him or he is doing it for profit, then the posting of a 
			link infringes copyright law, the court said.
 
 The European Commission, the EU executive, is set next week to 
			propose tougher rules on publishing copyrighted content, including a 
			new exclusive right for news publishers to ask search engines like 
			Google <GOOGL.O> to pay to show snippets of their articles.
 
 (Additional reporting by Philip Blenkinsop; Editing by Elaine 
			Hardcastle and Mark Potter)
 
			[© 2016 Thomson Reuters. All rights 
				reserved.] Copyright 2016 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, 
			broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. 
			
			
			 |