| 
		Democrats settle with Arizona officials 
		in suit over primary voting problems 
		 Send a link to a friend 
		
		 [September 10, 2016] 
		(Reuters) - The Democratic National 
		Committee on Friday said it settled part of a federal lawsuit over the 
		actions of Arizona poll officials during the presidential primary that 
		caused voters long waits and critics said disenfranchised some, 
		especially minorities. 
 The suit, filed in April in U.S. District Court in Arizona, targeted the 
		decision to sharply cut polling locations in Maricopa County, causing 
		waits of up to five hours for those casting ballots during the March 22 
		primary.
 
 "This is a great victory for Arizonans, and for our democracy," Donna 
		Brazile, interim chair of the Democratic National Committee, said in a 
		statement. "We know that long lines depress turnout."
 
 Representatives for the Maricopa County Board of Directors, the Maricopa 
		County Recorder's Office and the Secretary of State did not immediately 
		respond to requests for comment.
 
 The election had been mired in controversy from the outset, with polling 
		sites cut to 60, down from 200 in 2012, in a move that officials said 
		was designed to cut costs.
 
 County officials were quick to take blame for the cuts, saying they 
		misjudged voter turnout, based on recent history and increasing mail-in 
		votes.
 
		
		 
		
            [to top of second column] | 
            
			 
			Maricopa County miscalculated voter turnout and underestimated the 
			number of vote centers needed for the March presidential primaries, 
			the Democratic National Committee said in the statement. 
			As part of the settlement, Maricopa County election officials agreed 
			to consider the Democrats' recommendations on polling place queuing 
			and the use of electronic management systems, a copy of the 
			agreement showed. 
			
			 
			  
			The Democratic nominating contest for the Nov. 8 presidential 
			election was won by Hillary Clinton over Bernie Sanders. Both their 
			campaigns joined the lawsuit.
 The settlement has no bearing on other elements of the lawsuit, such 
			as a challenge to a law banning organizers from collecting mail-in 
			ballots from a voter's home for delivery to polling locations.
 
 (Reporting by Eric M. Johnson in Seattle; Editing by Clarence 
			Fernandez)
 
			[© 2016 Thomson Reuters. All rights 
			reserved.] Copyright 2016 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, 
			broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. |