New Hampshire to defend ban on ballot-box
selfies in court
Send a link to a friend
[September 13, 2016]
BOSTON (Reuters) - New Hampshire
officials on Tuesday will try to persuade a federal appeals court that a
2014 law banning voters from posting online photos of their ballots on
election day does not violate the U.S. right to free speech.
The state banned the practice two years ago in response to the growing
trend of voters taking selfies with their filled-in ballots and posting
them on social media sites, including Facebook and Twitter.
Opponents of the ban quickly charged that it violated the free-speech
protections of the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. A New
Hampshire voter sued in October 2014 after posting online a photo of his
ballot, on which he filled in the name of his dog as a sign of
displeasure over his choices in the 2014 Republican primary for the U.S.
Senate.
U.S. District Judge Paul Barbadoro agreed with that voter and his fellow
plaintiffs, pronouncing the law unconstitutional in August 2015.
The state appealed the following month, setting the stage for Tuesday's
arguments before the First Circuit of the U.S. Court of Appeals in
Boston.
New Hampshire argues that having the right to take a photo of a
filled-in ballot and post it publicly risks a return to the problem of
vote-buying, which ran rampant in the 19th century, when machine
politicians secured votes through cash or liquor.
[to top of second column] |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f9c08/f9c08e5855884d662903f8cf6ceacd0aed415dfe" alt=""
"Imagine a less fortunate '18-year-old, newly minted voter' who has
been informed that if she does not vote as she has been instructed,
she will lose the job she needs to pay her college tuition," state
officials wrote in court papers supporting the ban.
Opponents of the measure contend ballot-box selfies are a form of
political speech familiar to first-time voters, akin to the photos
they post of themselves on vacation, at concerts or with friends.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1c507/1c50721662b0412c5e310300e48f99b44241fa9c" alt=""
"Any activity that increases civic engagement among younger voters
should be recognized as a universal social good," wrote the New
England First Amendment Coalition and the Keene Sentinel newspaper
in a brief supporting the challenge to the law, which allows for a
fine of up to $1,000 for ballot selfies.
(Reporting by Scott Malone; Editing by Steve Orlofsky)
[© 2016 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
Copyright 2016 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. |