Climate change 'significant and direct'
threat to U.S. military: reports
Send a link to a friend
[September 14, 2016]
By Idrees Ali
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The effects of
climate change endanger U.S. military operations and could increase the
danger of international conflict, according to three new documents
endorsed by retired top U.S. military officers and former national
security officials.
"There are few easy answers, but one thing is clear: the current
trajectory of climatic change presents a strategically-significant risk
to U.S. national security, and inaction is not a viable option," said a
statement published on Wednesday by the Center for Climate and Security,
a Washington-based think tank.
It was signed by more than a dozen former senior military and national
security officials, including retired General Anthony Zinni, former
commander of the U.S. Central Command, and retired Admiral Samuel
Locklear, head of the Pacific Command until last year.
They called on the next U.S. president to create a cabinet level
position to deal with climate change and its impact on national
security.
A separate report by a panel of retired military officials, also
published on Wednesday by the Center for Climate and Security, said more
frequent extreme weather is a threat to U.S. coastal military
installations.
![](http://archives.lincolndailynews.com/2016/Sep/14/images/ads/current/Bonanza_sda_072214.png)
"The complex relationship between sea level rise, storm surge and global
readiness and responsiveness must be explored down to the operational
level, across the Services and Joint forces, and up to a strategic level
as well," the report said.
Earlier this year, another report said faster sea level rises in the
second half of this century could make tidal flooding a daily occurrence
for some installations.
Francesco Femia, co-founder and president of the Center for Climate and
Security, said the reports show bipartisan national security and
military officials think the existing U.S. response to climate change
"is not commensurate to the threat".
[to top of second column] |
![](../images/091416pics/news_c5.jpg)
U.S. Marines run down the beach to set up a mortar defense during a
simulated beach assault at Marine Corps Base Hawaii with the 3rd
Marine Expeditionary Unit during the multi-national military
exercise RIMPAC in Kaneohe, Hawaii, July 30, 2016. REUTERS/Hugh
Gentry
![](http://archives.lincolndailynews.com/2016/Sep/14/images/ads/current/st_claras_lda_082114.png)
The fact that a large and bipartisan number of former officials
signed the reports could increase pressure on future U.S.
administrations to place greater emphasis and dedicate more
resources to combat climate change.
Addressing climate change has not been a top priority in a 2016
campaign dominated by the U.S. economy, trade and foreign policy.
Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump has said that global
warming is a concept "created by the and for the Chinese" to hurt
U.S. business.
Democrat Hillary Clinton, meanwhile, has advocated shifting the
country to 50 percent clean energy by 2030 and promised heavy
regulation of fracking.
(Reporting by Idrees Ali. Additional reporting by Steve Holland;
editing by Yara Bayoumy and David Gregorio)
[© 2016 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
Copyright 2016 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
![](http://archives.lincolndailynews.com/2016/Sep/14/images/ads/current/modern_brake_sda_daily_fallfest_2015.png) |