Wells Fargo chief Stumpf
heads to Hill with pressure mounting
Send a link to a friend
[September 29, 2016]
By Lisa Lambert and Patrick Rucker
(Reuters) -
Wells
Fargo & Co's Chief Executive John Stumpf returns to Capitol Hill on
Thursday with his job still under threat and the bank facing rising
political pressure over a sales scandal that has become a major issue in
Washington and on Wall Street.
The bank's move earlier this week to claw back $41 million in stock
awarded to Stumpf, an unprecedented rebuke for a major U.S. bank CEO, is
unlikely to silence calls for him to resign over revelations Wells
Fargo's branch staff opened as many as two million unauthorized credit
card and deposit accounts to meet sales quotas.
The scandal has triggered lawsuits, investigations and wiped more than
$20 billion off the bank's market value.
California, Wells Fargo's home state, suspended business relationships
with the bank for a year on Wednesday and said it would work with the
state's two giant public pension funds to change the management
structure at the bank, including separating the roles of CEO and
chairman.
The episode has been a stunning reversal for Stumpf, long regarded as a
safe pair of hands in the industry for navigating Wells Fargo
successfully through the financial crisis.
"I don't know that he will survive this. I don't think there's any way
to come out of this with the same leadership," said Patricia Lenkov, CEO
of Agility Executive Search.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/45e8c/45e8cddef01b42831fd5804c0bf511d63cd9e975" alt=""
Stumpf will appear before the House Financial Services Committee, his
second congressional appearance in under 10 days.
Thursday's hearing may be softer on Stumpf than the bipartisan
tongue-lashing he took from the Senate Banking Committee on Sept. 20, in
which Massachusetts Senator Elizabeth Warren called him a "gutless
leader" who should be criminally investigated.
Warren said on Wednesday that Wells Fargo's decision to launch an
internal investigation and claw back bonuses paid to Stumpf and Carrie
Tolstedt, the former head of the retail division at the center of the
scandal, were “important first steps,” but still insufficient.
"The reduced compensation represents only a fraction of the total pay
and bonuses received by Mr. Stumpf and Ms. Tolstedt during the years
that their compensation was based in part on inflated retail account
growth and cross-selling success," she wrote in a letter to Wells
Fargo's board of directors.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5e7d7/5e7d71a6b4d832bc47421331d78d206c410a3118" alt=""
[to top of second column] |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dac00/dac000f35b2cd8487ccaa5c259566b4d528267f2" alt=""
Wells Fargo CEO John Stumpf testifies before a Senate Banking
Committee hearing on the firm's sales practices on Capitol Hill in
Washington, U.S., September 20, 2016. REUTERS/Gary Cameron
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/70d6f/70d6f881d20fcfd25b35afd3aa1eda25768334c0" alt=""
Andrew Duberstein at public relations firm Sard Verbinnen, which is
representing the board, did not respond to requests for comment on the
letter.
Stumpf will tell lawmakers on Thursday that Wells Fargo will eliminate
sales quotas for branch staff from Oct. 1, accelerating a previous plan
to halt the practice by Jan. 1, according to prepared testimony he will
deliver.
Federal regulators will also be in focus at the hearing.
Since the scandal broke, Texas Republican and chairman of the House
Financial Services Committee Jeb Hensarling has asked why they did not
act sooner and he is expected to raise that point again.
U.S. Federal Reserve Chair Janet Yellen promised the committee on
Wednesday that the central bank will scrutinize all big banks in the
wake of the Wells Fargo scandal. Some Democratic committee members said
it showed that some banks are too big to manage and should be broken up.
The most powerful Democrat on the committee, Representative Maxine
Waters of California, said she had not reached that conclusion, and
wanted to hear Stumpf's answers first. She declined to say whether steps
taken by Wells Fargo, including the $41 million clawback, were
sufficient.
"We will ask some of the basic questions about how this fraud took place
and why did it happen and whose decision it was," she said.
(Additional reporting by Ross Kerber in Boston; Writing by Dan Freed in
New York; Editing by Carmel Crimmins and Bill Rigby)
[© 2016 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2016 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bee2f/bee2fbf44bb9b8f57fe90505b995a70decf35346" alt="" |