|
 Researchers analyzed data on surgery outcomes for 1,386 patients
having devices removed because of infections, including a subset of
323 people who had abandoned leads – the wires that deliver energy
from pacemakers and defibrillators to the heart muscle.
Doctors were unable to remove the devices and all of the leads
without serious complications in 13 percent of patients who had
abandoned wires, compared to a 3.7 percent failure rate for patients
who didn’t have abandoned leads.
“Device infection is a very serious life threatening condition with
a 66 percent risk of death if left untreated,” said senior study
author Dr. Oussama Wazni, an electrophysiology researcher at
Cleveland Clinic in Ohio.
“Our study has shown that abandoning leads definitely complicates
future treatment of infected devices,” Wazni added by email.
Each year in the U.S. alone, more than 300,000 patients receive new
pacemakers and defibrillators, Wazni and colleagues note in the
Journal of the American College of Cardiology: Clinical
Electrophysiology.
Many of these patients will eventually need operations to upgrade or
replace devices, opening the door to infection. These infections are
often fatal. Even when doctors completely remove the old device and
leads and give patients antibiotics, the risk of death can be as
high as 18 percent, the researchers stress.
To look at how abandoned leads influence the outcome of procedures
to remove infected devices, researchers looked at data on patients
undergoing extractions at Cleveland Clinic between August 1996 and
September 2012.
Patients with abandoned leads were slightly older, around 70,
compared with an average age of 68 for the group without abandoned
leads.
With abandoned leads, procedures took longer and had more
complications. Surgery for patients with abandoned leads lasted from
130 to 220 minutes, compared with 85 to 155 minutes without the old
wiring present.
Following the surgery to remove an infected device, about 12 percent
of the patients who already had abandoned leads still had old wiring
left behind, compared with slightly less than 3 percent of the
people who didn’t have abandoned leads prior to the surgery.
Complications during and after surgery were more common for those
with abandoned leads going in, for example, 0.9 percent suffered
cardiac perforations during surgery compared to 0.09 percent of
those without abandoned leads. Also, 3.7 percent required a
transfusion compared to 0.9 percent without abandoned leads, and 3.7
percent had to be moved to the intensive care unit, compared to 1.4
percent without abandoned leads.
Within one month, 7.4 percent of the patients in the abandoned lead
group died, compared with 3.5 percent of the other patients.
[to top of second column] |
Because the study is observational, it can’t prove that abandoned
leads directly cause complications or deaths, only that these events
are more likely, the authors note.
Sometimes lead extraction may not be possible, such as in patients
taking anti-clotting drugs or that have other serious medical issues
such as low platelet count or liver disease.
It’s also possible that the device extraction experience over the
study period may not reflect current clinical practice, the authors
point out.
Even so, the findings highlight the need for increased awareness
about the risks associated with abandoned leads, said Dr. David
Wilber, editor of JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology.
“Many are unaware of the increased risk, but more importantly
removal of nonfunctioning leads requires special skills that a
majority of device implanters do not have, and specialized equipment
as well,” Wilber said by email. “Removal of leads carries some risk,
so patients who are older or more ill may decline lead removal.”
When patients need a device implanted, replaced or repaired, they
should ask about how much experience their surgeon has with the
procedure and with infected leads, said Dr. John Fisher, a
researcher at Albert Einstein College of Medicine and Montefiore
Medical Center who wasn’t involved in the study.
“Even the best surgeons or cardiologists involved in lead extraction
will occasionally be challenged by difficult cases,” Fisher, who
wasn’t involved in the study, said by email.
“Experience, careful surgical technique, and longer lasting devices
that reduce the need for replacement due to battery depletion are
all effective means of reducing infection,” Fisher added.
“Preoperative or perioperative antibiotics are also important.”
SOURCE: http://bit.ly/2dlD0qd Journal of the American College of
Cardiology: Clinical Electrophysiology, online September 7, 2016.
[© 2016 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2016 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. |
