Congress rejects Obama veto, Saudi
September 11 bill becomes law
Send a link to a friend
[September 29, 2016]
By Patricia Zengerle
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Congress on
Wednesday overwhelmingly rejected President Barack Obama's veto of
legislation allowing relatives of the victims of the Sept. 11 attacks to
sue Saudi Arabia, the first veto override of his presidency, just four
months before it ends.
The House of Representatives voted 348-77 against the veto, hours after
the Senate rejected it 97-1, meaning the "Justice Against Sponsors of
Terrorism Act" will become law.
The vote was a blow to Obama as well as to Saudi Arabia, one of the
United States' longest-standing allies in the Arab world, and some
lawmakers who supported the override already plan to revisit the issue.
Obama said he thought the Congress had made a mistake, reiterating his
belief that the legislation set a dangerous precedent and indicating
that he thought political considerations were behind the vote.
"If you're perceived as voting against 9/11 families right before an
election, not surprisingly, that's a hard vote for people to take. But
it would have been the right thing to do," he said on CNN.
Obama's 11 previous vetoes were all sustained. But this time almost all
his strongest Democratic supporters in Congress joined Republicans to
oppose him in one of their last actions before leaving Washington to
campaign for the Nov. 8 election.

"Overriding a presidential veto is something we don't take lightly, but
it was important in this case that the families of the victims of 9/11
be allowed to pursue justice, even if that pursuit causes some
diplomatic discomforts," Senator Charles Schumer, a top Senate Democrat,
said in a statement.
Schumer represents New York, site of the World Trade Center and home to
many of the nearly 3,000 people killed in the 2001 attacks, survivors
and families of victims.
The law, known as JASTA, passed the House and Senate without objections
earlier this year.
Support was fueled by impatience in Congress with Saudi Arabia over its
human rights record, promotion of a severe form of Islam tied to
militancy and failure to do more to ease the international refugee
crisis.
The law grants an exception to the legal principle of sovereign immunity
in cases of terrorism on U.S. soil, clearing the way for lawsuits
seeking damages from the Saudi government.
Riyadh has denied longstanding suspicions that it backed the hijackers
who attacked the United States in 2001. Fifteen of the 19 hijackers were
Saudi nationals.
Family members had tied their last push for the bill to the 15th
anniversary of the attacks this month, demonstrating outside the White
House and Capitol. On Wednesday, two fire trucks displayed a giant U.S.
flag outside the Senate.
"We rejoice in this triumph and look forward to our day in court and a
time when we may finally get more answers regarding who was truly behind
the attacks," Terry Strada, whose husband died in the attacks, said in a
statement.
RISK TO TROOPS?
Obama argued that JASTA could expose U.S. companies, troops and
officials to lawsuits if other countries passed reciprocal legislation,
and may anger important allies.
[to top of second column] |

Senators Chuck Schumer (D-NY) (L), Richard Blumenthal (D-CT), and
John Cornyn (R-TX), speak after the Senate voted to override U.S.
President Barack Obama's veto of a bill that would allow lawsuits
against Saudi Arabia's government over the Sept. 11 attacks, on
Capitol Hill in Washington, U.S., September 28, 2016. REUTERS/Joshua
Roberts

He called Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid and wrote a letter to
him explaining that he strongly believed enacting JASTA into law
would be detrimental to U.S. interests. Reid became the only senator
to side with Obama.
Some lawmakers said the White House, which has a history of poor
relations with Congress, had waited too long to fight the bill.
The Sept. 11 families have received more than $7 billion, but bill
backers said their intention was to allow lawsuits to punish any
government that backs terrorism on U.S. soil.
"This bill was carefully negotiated over more than six years,"
Representative Jerrold Nadler, another New York Democrat, told the
House.
The issue, however, may not be finished. At least 28 senators signed
a letter to JASTA's sponsors, Schumer and Republican Senator John
Cornyn, asking that they work with them to mitigate any potential
unintended national security and foreign policy consequences.
The Saudi government financed an extensive lobbying campaign against
the legislation.
U.S. corporations including General Electric Co and Dow Chemical Co
also opposed it, as did the European Union and other U.S. allies.
Secretary of Defense Ash Carter and General Joseph Dunford, chairman
of the joint chiefs of staff, opposed the bill and CIA Director John
Brennan said JASTA had "grave implications" for national security.

Democratic Senator Tim Kaine, Hillary Clinton's vice presidential
running mate, and Bernie Sanders, an independent and former
Democratic White House contender, did not vote.
Override opponents in the House included Representative Mac
Thornberry, Republican chairman of the Armed Services committee, and
Adam Smith, its ranking Democrat, citing concern about U.S. forces
overseas.
(Additional reporting by Richard Cowan and Jonathan Landay in
Washington, and Roberta Rampton aboard Air Force One; editing by
Marguerita Choy, Leslie Adler and G Crosse)
[© 2016 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
Copyright 2016 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. |