U.S. House panel
lambastes Wells Fargo boss over phantom accounts
Send a link to a friend
[September 30, 2016]
By Patrick Rucker and Dan Freed
WASHINGTON/NEW
YORK (Reuters) - U.S. lawmakers called on Thursday for Wells Fargo & Co
chief John Stumpf to resign and a top House Democrat demanded the bank
be broken up because it is too big to manage.
Stumpf's second trip to Capitol Hill on Thursday went no better than his
first as lawmakers from both parties rebuked his handling of sales
abuses and said the bank had damaged customer trust as well as the
broader banking system.
Wells Fargo staff opened checking, savings and credit card accounts
without customer say-so for years to satisfy managers' demand for new
business, according to a $190 million settlement with regulators reached
early this month.
U.S. Representative Maxine Waters, the committee's senior Democrat,
faulted the bank for identity theft in the fraud and called for Wells
Fargo to be dismantled because it was too big to manage.
She called the sales abuses "some of the most egregious fraud we have
seen since the foreclosure crisis." After the hearing, the California
lawmaker told reporters she would introduce legislation to break up
Wells Fargo.
The bank has said as many as 2 million accounts may have been wrongly
opened and Stumpf promised to undo any harm to customers.
The chief executive said, however, that Wells Fargo did not expect to
see disgruntled bank customers in court.
Wells Fargo is offering arbitration for its unhappy clients, Stumpf
said. Pushed about whether he would waive that mandatory arbitration
rule and allow customers to sue, Stumpf said: "No."
Members of the House Financial Services Committee blasted Stumpf over
the bank's culture, his compensation and whether the right people were
being punished for opening fee-generating, phantom accounts.
The episode has been a stunning reversal for Stumpf, long regarded as a
safe pair of hands in the industry for navigating Wells Fargo
successfully through the financial crisis. Stumpf again heard lawmakers
calling for him to step aside.
Jeb Hensarling, the Republican chairman of the committee, said in his
opening statement he had lost faith in Wells Fargo, which does some of
his banking.
"Mr. Stumpf, I have a mortgage with your bank," Hensarling said. "I wish
I didn’t. I wish I was in the position to pay it off because you have
broken my trust as you have broken the trust of millions."
Wells Fargo shares fell 2.07 percent to $44.37. Since Sept. 7, the last
trading day before the scandal broke, its stock has lost 11 percent, or
about $27 billion in market value, based on Reuters data. The stock is
trading at its lowest since early 2014.
BROKEN TRUST
Republicans on the committee have often advocated easing Wall Street
regulations, but they were among Stumpf's strongest critics at
Thursday's hearing.
Asked by Representative Sean Duffy, a Republican from Wisconsin, about
whether Wells Fargo employees 'stole,' Stumpf said: "In some cases, they
did."
"I am deeply sorry that we didn't do the right thing," Stumpf said in
response to a lawmaker who said the scandal had eroded the bank's market
value.
[to top of second column] |
Wells Fargo CEO John Stumpf testifies before the House Financial
Services Committee on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC, U.S. September
29, 2016. REUTERS/Gary Cameron
Representative Steve Pearce, a Republican from New Mexico, faulted Stumpf for
saying the company's board could eventually be relied on to sanction the
executives responsible.
"I, sir, think you ought to submit a resignation and your board cannot hold off
action on that," he said.
Representative Brad Sherman, a Democrat from California, asked the committee to
summon other Wall Street chiefs, including from Citigroup Inc and Bank of
America Corp, to determine if they had imposed sales demands and quotas on their
employees.
"I don't think, Mr. Stumpf, that you should be alone in this joyous experience,"
Sherman said.
Stumpf said the bank was strengthening oversight of sales tactics, changing
procedures for issuing credit cards and had paid back past and current customers
for any fees incurrent on the ghost accounts.
Earlier this week, the bank took back $41 million in stock awarded to Stumpf, an
unprecedented rebuke to a major U.S. bank chief executive officer.
Democratic Representative Carolyn Maloney of New York raised questions about $13
million in stock sales by the CEO in 2013 after he learned about the abuses.
Stumpf said he sold stock with proper approvals and added the sales were made
"with no view about what was going on."
The
affair has triggered lawsuits, more investigations and wiped more than $20
billion from the bank's market value.
While Wells Fargo may be shielded from some customer actions, the bank may just
be starting to face heightened regulatory scrutiny.
On Thursday, the bank agreed to pay the Justice Department $4.1 million to
resolve allegations it illegally repossessed cars owned by U.S. service members.
In a separate settlement of similar allegations, the bank will pay a $20 million
settlement with the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency.
(Additional reporting by Ross Kerber in Boston and Lisa Lambert in Washington;
Writing Nick Zieminski in New York; Editing by Alan Crosby and Peter Cooney)
[© 2016 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2016 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. |