Rangers try gaming
technology to protect African wildlife
Send a link to a friend
[September 30, 2016]
By Neha Wadekar
NAIROBI
(Reuters) - The campaign to track down poachers and protect endangered
species in Africa's embattled reserves is tapping into the technology
used in the virtual world of online poker and other computer games.
A U.S.-funded initiative is applying artificial intelligence and game
theory algorithms to predict the movement of poachers, helping rangers
who are testing the new technology in Uganda to find illegal hunters and
their animal traps.
"We're trying to predict future poacher attacks or where poachers may
strike next based on what we have observed in the past on our patrols,"
Professor Milind Tambe from the University of Southern California, who
is leading the initiative, said.
"Each confiscated snare represents an animal's life saved," Tambe, whose
team is developing technology called Protection Assistant for Wildlife
Security (PAWS), told Reuters by phone.
Across Africa, a battle against poaching is raging but often being lost.
African elephant numbers, for example, fell by 20 percent between 2006
and 2015 because of a surge in ivory poaching, according to
conservationists.
There have been some successes. Uganda has seen its elephant population
recover from a nadir of 700 to 800 in the 1980s after years of chaotic
rule and dictatorship to reach about 5,000 now. But officials say
poaching is back on the rise.
"Elephant poaching has started to increase in the last five years, which
is a major concern, and that’s linked to the global price of ivory,"
said Andy Plumptre, director of the Albertine Rift Program for the
Wildlife Conservation Society in Uganda.
The problem is not just big time poachers seeking ivory, which can sell
for $1,000 a kilogram ($450 a pound) or more. Illegal hunters are
sometimes locals seeking meat to eat or sell to pay school fees.
Killing game, meanwhile, has knock-on effects. It destroys prey chased
by carnivores such as lions and leopards, causing their numbers to drop
too.
PAWS
This is where PAWS, which is being tested in Uganda's Queen Elizabeth
National Park, aims to assist in the fight against poaching. The system
helps rangers map routes in the same way mathematical computer models
predict how a rational human reacts and create opponents for online
poker and other games.
"We want to deliver the software so the local rangers can use it with
minimum training,” Tambe said, adding that Queen Elizabeth National Park
offered 18 years of ranger-collected data on illegal activities to help
perfect the technology.
[to top of second column] |
A pygmy hunts a monkey in Semiliki national park rain forest in
Bundibugyo district, west of Uganda's capital Kampala, August 8,
2006. REUTERS/James Akena/File Photo
In the
past month since the latest round of testing began, rangers using PAWS have
found 10 antelope traps and elephant snares waiting to be triggered, a far
better score card than they could usually expect without technological
assistance.
Sometimes success still comes too late, one patrol using PAWS found an elephant
carcass with tusks sawn off.
Tambe has used game theory software to improve efficiency of U.S. law
enforcement and government agencies since the early 2000s, but realized the
techniques could also protect wildlife.
Initial PAWS testing has also taken place in Malaysia, and the program has been
funded by the U.S. National Science Foundation (NSF) and the Army Research
Office.
PAWS faces its own challenges, however.
Poor mobile and internet connectivity in the park could prevent the rangers from
using the software accurately and in real-time.
It could also bring rangers even closer to poachers who have proved ready to
turn their guns on the authorities elsewhere. In Virunga National Park, in
neighboring Democratic Republic of Congo, 150 rangers have been killed in the
past decade.
(Editing by Edmund Blair/Jeremy Gaunt)
[© 2016 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2016 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
|