U.S. lawmakers may change September 11
law after rejecting veto
Send a link to a friend
[September 30, 2016]
By Patricia Zengerle and Richard Cowan
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - U.S. lawmakers
expressed doubts on Thursday about Sept. 11 legislation they forced on
President Barack Obama, saying the new law allowing lawsuits against
Saudi Arabia could be narrowed to ease concerns about its effect on
Americans abroad.
A day after a rare overwhelming rejection of a presidential veto, the
first during Obama's eight years in the White House, the Republican
leaders of the Senate and House of Representatives opened the door to
fixing the law as they blamed the Democratic president for not
consulting them adequately.
"I do think it is worth further discussing," Senate Majority Leader
Mitch McConnell told reporters, acknowledging that there could be
"potential consequences" of the Justice Against Sponsors of Terrorism
Act, known as JASTA.
House Speaker Paul Ryan said Congress might have to "fix" the
legislation to protect U.S. troops in particular.
Ryan did not give a time frame, but Republican Senator Bob Corker,
chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, said he thought
JASTA could be addressed in Congress' "lame-duck" session after the Nov.
8 election.
The law grants an exception to the legal principle of sovereign immunity
in cases of terrorism on U.S. soil, clearing the way for lawsuits
seeking damages from the Saudi government. Riyadh denies longstanding
suspicions that it backed the hijackers who attacked the United States
in 2001.
Sept. 11 families lobbied intensely for the bill, getting it passed by
the House days before the 15th anniversary of the 2001 attacks earlier
this month after years of effort.
"We have to understand the political environment we’re in right now and
the tremendous support the 9/11 victims have in the United States," said
Robert Jordan, a former U.S. ambassador to Saudi Arabia.
Riyadh is one of Washington's longest-standing and most important allies
in the Middle East and part of a U.S.-led coalition fighting Islamic
State militants in Iraq and Syria.
SAUDI CONDEMNATION
The Saudis lobbied furiously against JASTA, and the Saudi foreign
ministry condemned its passage in a statement on Thursday. "The erosion
of sovereign immunity will have a negative impact on all nations,
including the United States," said the statement, which was carried on
state news agency SPA.
Still, the new law is not expected to have a lasting effect on the two
countries' strategic relationship.
Saudi-U.S. ties have endured "multiple times of deep outrage" over 70
years, said Thomas Lippman of the Middle East Institute. "The two
countries need each other as much today as they did before the day
before yesterday," he said.
[to top of second column] |
Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell speaks at the Republican
National Convention in Cleveland, Ohio, U.S. July 19, 2016.
REUTERS/Mike Segar
White House spokesman Josh Earnest mocked lawmakers for shifting
"within minutes" from overwhelmingly voting to override Obama's veto
to wanting to change the law.
"I think what we've seen in the United States Congress is a pretty
classic case of rapid onset buyer's remorse," Earnest told a White
House briefing.
Corker said he had tried to work out a compromise with the White
House, but Obama administration officials declined a meeting.
Democratic Senator Chuck Schumer, who championed JASTA in the
Senate, said he was open to revisiting the legislation. "I'm willing
to look at any proposal they make but not any that hurt the
families," he said at a news conference.
He said he would oppose a suggestion that the measure be narrowed to
only apply to the 2001 attacks on Washington and New York. "You know
what that does? It tells the Saudis to go ahead and do it again, and
we won't punish you," Schumer said.
Corker said another suggestion was establishing an international
tribunal so experts could determine whether there was culpability.
He said the Saudis were been willing to work on a compromise, and
denied they had threatened retaliation.
Trent Lott, a former Republican Senate Majority Leader now at a
Washington law firm lobbying for the Saudis, said attorneys would
look carefully at JASTA's language.
"I do feel passionately this is a mistake for a variety of reasons,
in terms of threats to troops, diplomats, sovereignty, there's
serious problems here. Hopefully we can find a way to change the
tenor of this," Lott said.
(Additional reporting by Roberta Rampton, Susan Cornwell, David
Morgan, Yara Bayoumy, David Alexander and Susan Heavey; editing by
Grant McCool and Tom Brown)
[© 2016 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
Copyright 2016 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. |