Wall Street braces for rough
ride as exchanges seek more speed bumps
Send a link to a friend
[April 04, 2017]
By John McCrank
NEW YORK (Reuters) - U.S. stock exchanges
that spent decades speeding up markets with cutting-edge technology are
now rushing to slow them down.
The New York Stock Exchange, Chicago Stock Exchange and Nasdaq Inc are
all awaiting decisions by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on
whether they can delay trades through so-called "speed bumps" and new
order types.
The SEC is expected to approve or reject their proposals in the coming
weeks.
The about-face comes after advances in technology made it possible to
complete trades almost at the speed of light, prompting concerns by some
market participants that sophisticated high-frequency traders were
eating the lunch of ordinary investors.
Exchanges have profited from selling specialized services to
high-frequency traders, which make up more than half of U.S. trading
volume. But now they are looking at ways to attract a wider range of
investors, at least to certain of their trading venues, or are making
sure they are keeping up with each other.
The SEC approved the market's first speed bump last year, but rules
around intentionally slowing down trades are vague and it is difficult
to predict which, if any, of the proposals will pass. SEC staff are
scrutinizing how each exchange justifies its plans, said a person
familiar with the matter.
"Whenever you have something that applies to one group and not others,
it's discriminatory in some sense," said the person, who asked for
anonymity as they are not authorized to speak to the media. "The
question is, can you justify the discrimination?"
The proposals follow the launch of IEX Group, which burst onto the scene
last August with the market's inaugural speed bump and other features
they said would level the playing field and protect small investors from
high-speed trading chicanery.
Other exchanges were some of IEX's fiercest opponents and there is still
a heated debate about whether the upstart is as altruistic as it was
portrayed in Michael Lewis's best-selling book "Flash Boys: A Wall
Street Revolt." However, its new way of doing business ultimately forced
rivals to rethink their own strategies.
Exchanges' reputations hinge on their ability to execute orders quickly
and seamlessly for brokers, which are required to get customers the best
market prices.
Lewis's book scandalized Wall Street with its claim that exchanges were
rigging the market by allowing high-frequency traders to use their speed
to effectively jump the queue of orders from ordinary investors, known
in the industry as "latency arbitrage." Many on Wall Street dispute that
such a thing exists.
Nevertheless, high-frequency trading firms pay exchanges huge sums for
near light-speed market access and data to drive their algorithms, and
have become an increasingly large player in the stock market over the
past decade.
IEX ran counter to the trend by establishing an exchange that does not
make speed the primary factor and does not sell things like access to
microwave and laser data feeds that give ultra-fast traders an edge. The
approach appealed to many customers, including several institutional
investors, and the exchange now has 2 percent of the U.S. stock-trading
market. (Graphic: http://tmsnrt.rs/2mJMuor)
Most traditional exchanges initially opposed IEX's speed-bump proposal,
but have since had a change of heart, since it has become clear that
some investors want to see such change.
[to top of second column] |
A specialist trader works at his post on the floor of the New York
Stock Exchange (NYSE) in New York, U.S., March 30, 2017.
REUTERS/Brendan McDermid
"The SEC, by approving IEX's exchange application, has opened up the
marketplace for the potential for innovation around market structure
that really has not been available to us for the last almost 10 years,"
said Nasdaq Chief Executive Adena Friedman.
UN-AMERICAN?
In giving IEX the green light, the SEC said exchanges could pause trades
for up to a millisecond, as long as the delays were not unfairly
discriminatory or anti-competitive.
The NYSE, which is owned by Intercontinental Exchange Inc, essentially
wants to copy IEX's speed bump, as well as an order type the startup
pioneered. NYSE argues that while it previously said the model was bad
for the market, some institutional investors prefer it and NYSE should
be allowed to offer them the choice.
NYSE, whose chairman once called IEX "un-American," also plans to rename
its proposed speed-bump exchange NYSE American from NYSE MKT. NYSE's
main New York Stock Exchange market would remain unchanged.
In contrast, the Chicago Stock Exchange put forward a speed-bump plan
that some brokers can bypass if they meet strict requirements to provide
quotes for others. In doing so, it hopes to create more liquidity.
Rather than a speed bump, Nasdaq wants to introduce an "extended life"
order type. It would apply only to orders generated by regular,
mom-and-pop investors, who tend to be less informed and therefore
coveted by professional traders. The orders would sit exposed for at
least a second and then jump ahead of other investors to get filled.
Wall Street lacks consensus on whether the proposed delays are a good
idea.
Some high-frequency trading firms have asked the SEC to deny the
proposals, arguing that various time lags across 13 exchanges would make
it difficult to know the true price of a stock at any given time.
For its part, IEX has asked the SEC to reject NYSE's proposal. In an
interview, Chief Market Policy Officer John Ramsay characterized some
rivals' plans as disingenuous.
"The speed bump is just one piece of our market design and it's designed
to work with all of the other pieces in tandem,” said John Ramsay, IEX's
Chief Market Policy Officer.
Others support the new developments.
"The only one this impacts is the guy whose business model is to rely on
speed in somewhat, I would argue, a pernicious manner," Doug Cifu, CEO
of trading firm Virtu Financial Inc <VIRT.O>, said in an interview.
(Reporting by John McCrank; Editing by Lauren Tara LaCapra and Bill
Rigby)
[© 2017 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2017 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. |