| 
		 
		Senate Republican leader starts clock 
		ticking to Gorsuch showdown 
		
		 
		Send a link to a friend  
 
		
		
		 [April 05, 2017] 
		By Lawrence Hurley and Richard Cowan 
		 
		WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. Senate 
		moved on Tuesday toward ramming through approval of President Donald 
		Trump's Supreme Court nominee this week, as its top Republican said he 
		had the votes to wipe away Democratic roadblocks but vowed to preserve 
		the minority party's ability to hold up legislation. 
		 
		Majority Leader Mitch McConnell plans to change the Senate's 
		long-standing rules in order to eliminate the ability to use a 
		procedural hurdle called a filibuster against Supreme Court nominees 
		like Trump's pick, Neil Gorsuch, if a Democratic filibuster succeeds as 
		expected in blocking a confirmation vote. 
		 
		Senate confirmation of Gorsuch, 49, to the lifetime post would restore 
		the court's conservative majority and enable Trump to leave a lasting 
		imprint on America's highest judicial body even as he regularly 
		criticizes the federal judiciary. 
		 
		McConnell said he had the necessary votes to approve the rule change 
		with a simple majority vote, expected on Thursday. Republicans control 
		the Senate 52-48. The rule change has been dubbed the "nuclear option," 
		and Trump has encouraged McConnell to "go nuclear." 
		 
		Such a step would threaten to further erode trust between the parties in 
		Congress. 
		 
		"There's a reason they call it the nuclear option, and that is because 
		there's fallout. And this fallout will be dangerously and perhaps 
		disastrously radioactive for the Senate for years to come," Democratic 
		Senator Richard Blumenthal told reporters. 
		
		  
		
		Republicans were so confident they could use their muscle to pass the 
		rule change that Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley said 
		flatly that Gorsuch "will be on the Supreme Court Friday night." 
		 
		Amid a fierce debate over both Gorsuch and the Senate's rules, McConnell 
		tried to tamp down any speculation that Republicans would stage a 
		monumental power grab by ending the filibuster for legislation. 
		 
		McConnell said that as long as he was the Senate's majority leader, he 
		would never remove the ability to mount a filibuster against 
		legislation, as opposed to presidential appointments. McConnell fought 
		against many of former Democratic President Barack Obama's legislative 
		initiatives when Republicans were the minority party in the Senate. 
		 
		"There's not a single senator in the (Republican) majority who thinks we 
		ought to change the legislative filibuster, not one," McConnell told 
		reporters. 
		 
		The move to change venerable Senate rules reflects an intensifying of 
		the already-toxic partisanship in Washington since Trump took office in 
		January. 
		 
		McConnell's promise to keep the ability to filibuster legislation could 
		make it more difficult for Republicans to get key parts of Trump's 
		legislative agenda through the Senate, considering the expected strong 
		Democratic opposition. 
		 
		'BREAK THE RULES' 
		 
		A filibuster requires a super-majority of 60 votes in the 100-seat 
		Senate in order to proceed to a simple majority vote on a Supreme Court 
		nominee or legislation. 
		 
		The 60-vote super-majority threshold that gives the minority party power 
		to hold up the majority party has forced the Senate over the decades to 
		try to achieve bipartisanship in legislation and presidential 
		appointments. 
		 
		
            [to top of second column]  | 
            
             
            
			  
            
			U.S. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) speaks to 
			reporters after the weekly Republican caucus policy luncheon at the 
			U.S. Capitol in Washington, U.S., March 28, 2017. REUTERS/Eric 
			Thayer 
            
			  
			The Senate on Tuesday kicked off its formal debate on confirming 
			Gorsuch, a Colorado-based appeals court judge, and McConnell said he 
			would get the clock ticking toward a vote expected on Thursday to 
			stop the Democrats' filibuster. 
			 
			Democrats on Monday amassed the votes needed to sustain the 
			filibuster, prompting Republicans to move toward changing the rules. 
			 
			Democratic Senator Jeff Merkley took to the Senate floor on Tuesday 
			evening to rally support for the Gorsuch filibuster. His office said 
			in a statement that he "plans to hold the floor and refuse to yield 
			for as long as he is able to continue speaking." Merkley's "talking 
			filibuster" is not expected to affect the Republican timetable for 
			Gorsuch's confirmation. 
			 
			The filibuster in one form or another dates back to the 19th century 
			but assumed its current form in the 1970s. 
			 
			The Democrats were the first to use the "nuclear option." In 2013, 
			when they controlled the Senate, they changed it to bar filibusters 
			for executive branch nominees and federal judges aside from Supreme 
			Court justices. They did so after Republicans filibustered Obama's 
			appeals court nominees. 
			 
			"Democrats are now being pushed by far-left interest groups into 
			doing something truly detrimental to this body and to our country," 
			McConnell said on the Senate floor. "They seem to be hurtling toward 
			the abyss this time, and trying to take the Senate with them." 
			 
			Top Senate Democrat Chuck Schumer, leading the filibuster effort, 
			said it was the Republicans who bore responsibility for the crisis 
			and for deciding, as he said, to "break the rules." 
			 
			He noted that the Senate, under McConnell's guidance, refused last 
			year to consider Obama's nomination of appellate judge Merrick 
			Garland to fill the same high court vacancy that Trump elected 
			Gorsuch to fill. 
			 
			"What the majority leader did to Merrick Garland by denying him even 
			a hearing and a vote is even worse than a filibuster," Schumer said 
			on the Senate floor. 
			
			
			  
			
			 
			Restoring the nine-seat high court's conservative majority would 
			fulfill one of Trump's top promises during the 2016 presidential 
			campaign. 
			 
			Republicans say Gorsuch is well qualified for the job and that there 
			is no principled reason to oppose him. Democrats say he is so 
			conservative as to be outside the judicial mainstream, has favored 
			corporate interests over ordinary Americans in legal opinions, and 
			has shown insufficient independence from Trump. 
			 
			(Reporting by Lawrence Hurley; Additional reporting by Richard Cowan 
			and Tim Ahmann; Editing by Will Dunham) 
			
			[© 2017 Thomson Reuters. All rights 
			reserved.] 
			Copyright 2017 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, 
			broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.  |