Senate Republican leader starts clock
ticking to Gorsuch showdown
Send a link to a friend
[April 05, 2017]
By Lawrence Hurley and Richard Cowan
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. Senate
moved on Tuesday toward ramming through approval of President Donald
Trump's Supreme Court nominee this week, as its top Republican said he
had the votes to wipe away Democratic roadblocks but vowed to preserve
the minority party's ability to hold up legislation.
Majority Leader Mitch McConnell plans to change the Senate's
long-standing rules in order to eliminate the ability to use a
procedural hurdle called a filibuster against Supreme Court nominees
like Trump's pick, Neil Gorsuch, if a Democratic filibuster succeeds as
expected in blocking a confirmation vote.
Senate confirmation of Gorsuch, 49, to the lifetime post would restore
the court's conservative majority and enable Trump to leave a lasting
imprint on America's highest judicial body even as he regularly
criticizes the federal judiciary.
McConnell said he had the necessary votes to approve the rule change
with a simple majority vote, expected on Thursday. Republicans control
the Senate 52-48. The rule change has been dubbed the "nuclear option,"
and Trump has encouraged McConnell to "go nuclear."
Such a step would threaten to further erode trust between the parties in
Congress.
"There's a reason they call it the nuclear option, and that is because
there's fallout. And this fallout will be dangerously and perhaps
disastrously radioactive for the Senate for years to come," Democratic
Senator Richard Blumenthal told reporters.
Republicans were so confident they could use their muscle to pass the
rule change that Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley said
flatly that Gorsuch "will be on the Supreme Court Friday night."
Amid a fierce debate over both Gorsuch and the Senate's rules, McConnell
tried to tamp down any speculation that Republicans would stage a
monumental power grab by ending the filibuster for legislation.
McConnell said that as long as he was the Senate's majority leader, he
would never remove the ability to mount a filibuster against
legislation, as opposed to presidential appointments. McConnell fought
against many of former Democratic President Barack Obama's legislative
initiatives when Republicans were the minority party in the Senate.
"There's not a single senator in the (Republican) majority who thinks we
ought to change the legislative filibuster, not one," McConnell told
reporters.
The move to change venerable Senate rules reflects an intensifying of
the already-toxic partisanship in Washington since Trump took office in
January.
McConnell's promise to keep the ability to filibuster legislation could
make it more difficult for Republicans to get key parts of Trump's
legislative agenda through the Senate, considering the expected strong
Democratic opposition.
'BREAK THE RULES'
A filibuster requires a super-majority of 60 votes in the 100-seat
Senate in order to proceed to a simple majority vote on a Supreme Court
nominee or legislation.
The 60-vote super-majority threshold that gives the minority party power
to hold up the majority party has forced the Senate over the decades to
try to achieve bipartisanship in legislation and presidential
appointments.
[to top of second column] |
U.S. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) speaks to
reporters after the weekly Republican caucus policy luncheon at the
U.S. Capitol in Washington, U.S., March 28, 2017. REUTERS/Eric
Thayer
The Senate on Tuesday kicked off its formal debate on confirming
Gorsuch, a Colorado-based appeals court judge, and McConnell said he
would get the clock ticking toward a vote expected on Thursday to
stop the Democrats' filibuster.
Democrats on Monday amassed the votes needed to sustain the
filibuster, prompting Republicans to move toward changing the rules.
Democratic Senator Jeff Merkley took to the Senate floor on Tuesday
evening to rally support for the Gorsuch filibuster. His office said
in a statement that he "plans to hold the floor and refuse to yield
for as long as he is able to continue speaking." Merkley's "talking
filibuster" is not expected to affect the Republican timetable for
Gorsuch's confirmation.
The filibuster in one form or another dates back to the 19th century
but assumed its current form in the 1970s.
The Democrats were the first to use the "nuclear option." In 2013,
when they controlled the Senate, they changed it to bar filibusters
for executive branch nominees and federal judges aside from Supreme
Court justices. They did so after Republicans filibustered Obama's
appeals court nominees.
"Democrats are now being pushed by far-left interest groups into
doing something truly detrimental to this body and to our country,"
McConnell said on the Senate floor. "They seem to be hurtling toward
the abyss this time, and trying to take the Senate with them."
Top Senate Democrat Chuck Schumer, leading the filibuster effort,
said it was the Republicans who bore responsibility for the crisis
and for deciding, as he said, to "break the rules."
He noted that the Senate, under McConnell's guidance, refused last
year to consider Obama's nomination of appellate judge Merrick
Garland to fill the same high court vacancy that Trump elected
Gorsuch to fill.
"What the majority leader did to Merrick Garland by denying him even
a hearing and a vote is even worse than a filibuster," Schumer said
on the Senate floor.
Restoring the nine-seat high court's conservative majority would
fulfill one of Trump's top promises during the 2016 presidential
campaign.
Republicans say Gorsuch is well qualified for the job and that there
is no principled reason to oppose him. Democrats say he is so
conservative as to be outside the judicial mainstream, has favored
corporate interests over ordinary Americans in legal opinions, and
has shown insufficient independence from Trump.
(Reporting by Lawrence Hurley; Additional reporting by Richard Cowan
and Tim Ahmann; Editing by Will Dunham)
[© 2017 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
Copyright 2017 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. |