How artificial life spawned a
billion-dollar industry
Send a link to a friend
[April 06, 2017]
By Ben Hirschler
LONDON (Reuters) - Scientists are getting
closer to building life from scratch and technology pioneers are taking
notice, with record sums moving into a field that could deliver novel
drugs, materials, chemicals and even perfumes.
Despite ethical and safety concerns, investors are attracted by
synthetic biology's wide market potential and the plummeting cost of DNA
synthesis, which is industrializing the writing of the genetic code that
determines how organisms function.
While existing biotechnology is already used to make medicines like
insulin and genetically modified crops, synthesizing whole genes or
genomes gives an opportunity for far more extensive changes.
Matt Ocko, a Silicon Valley venture capitalist whose past investments
include Facebook <FB.O>, Uber [UBER.UL] and Zynga <ZNGA.O>, believes the
emerging industry has passed the "epiphany" moment needed to prove it
can deliver economic value.
"Synthetic biology companies are now becoming more like the disruptive,
industrial-scale value propositions that define any technology
business," he said.
"The things that sustain and accelerate this industry are today more
effective, lower cost, more precise and more repeatable. That makes it
easier to extract disruptive value."
Ocko, whose Data Collective firm has invested in companies including
organism design firm Gingko Bioworks and bioengineer Zymergen, is not
alone.
Other tech veterans backing the new wave of "synbio" start-ups include
Jerry Yang, Marc Andreessen, Peter Thiel and Eric Schmidt, famous for
their roles at Yahoo <YHOO.O>, Netscape, PayPal and Google respectively.
UNCERTAINTIES REMAIN
Experts meeting in London this week said the science toolkit was
improving fast and the cost of synthesizing DNA was now 100 times
cheaper than in 2003, although uncertainties remain about regulation and
the public's appetite for tinkering with life.
The global conference hosted by Imperial College London, bringing
together scientists and money people, comes four weeks after researchers
announced they were close to building a complete artificial genome for
baker's yeast.
This ambitious project has brought complex artificial life a big step
closer because yeast is a eukaryote, an organism whose cells contain a
nucleus, just like human cells.
The yeast work shows how DNA can be manipulated on a large scale, with
genetic code increasingly treated like a programming language in which
binary 1s and 0s are replaced by DNA's four chemical building blocks,
abbreviated as A, T, G, C.
A growing emphasis on computing is closing the gap between biology and
traditional tech, even though this is an area that remains
unpredictable, variable and complex.
"The intersection of biology and technology is a difficult place to be
because of different cultures and languages, but I think we are breaking
through some of those barriers," said Thomas Bostick, former head of the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers who now leads biotech firm Intrexon's
<XON.N> environment unit.
The idea that engineering life can be broken down into data and coding
is part of the appeal for tech investors.
"DNA is seen as the next programmable matter and that is what a lot of
the Silicon Valley investors are excited about," said John Cumbers,
founder of synthetic biology network SynBioBeta.
"They've witnessed the power of software over the last 25 years and they
are looking for the next big thing."
Data from SynBioBeta shows a record $1.21 billion was invested in the
sector worldwide in 2016, a threefold increase from five years earlier,
while the number of firms in the sector has almost doubled to 411.
[to top of second column] |
A researcher, seen through a window, prepares DNA in a laboratory at
the Bioaster Technology Research Institute in Lyon, France, October
31, 2014. REUTERS/Robert Pratta/File Photo
A range of companies are springing up, from those producing new
chemicals for industry to providers of DNA synthesis and related
software, like U.S.-based Twist Bioscience and Britain's Synthace.
Work is also advancing by leaps and bounds in the complementary area
of gene editing now being embraced by many of the world's top
drugmakers.
CHANGE OF TACK
The current product focus represents a change of tack from the first
widely tipped application of synthetic biology in making biofuels
from engineered algae.
In the event, algal biofuel proved a lot harder to scale up than
expected and a tumbling oil price during the Great Recession of the
late 2000s undercut the business model.
Drew Endy of Stanford University believes the case for using
synthetic biology to take on gasoline never stacked up.
"Why would you bank your whole platform on a bulk high-volume,
low-price, low-margin product? It's baffling, not strategic," he
said.
Today's synbio firms are looking at more niche and expensive
products, such as potent painkillers and cancer medicines made in
yeast cells - or fabrics with novel properties, although some have
only reached demonstration stage.
California-based Bolt Threads recently debuted a limited edition
$314 necktie made from yeast-derived spider's silk and Japanese
rival Spiber has made a concept piece spider-silk parka jacket.
Boston-based Gingko Bioworks, meanwhile, is developing a rose oil
for French fragrance house Robertet <ROBF.PA> and Switzerland's
Evolva <EVE.S> has developed a vanillin, or vanilla extract, that,
unlike most vanilla flavoring, is not made from petrochemicals.
In some areas - especially anything to do with food or the
environment - synthetic biology is already running into criticism.
Friends of the Earth was quick to condemn the new yeast-derived
vanillin as "extreme" genetic engineering.
Other controversies appear inevitable as synthetic biologists push
the envelope with more extreme projects, such as a Harvard team's
"Jurassic Park"-style proposal to resurrect the woolly mammoth by
adapting the Asian elephant genome.
Intrexon's Bostick, whose firm is releasing millions of genetically
manipulated mosquitoes in Brazil in a bid to slash populations of
Zika-carrying insects, believes each synthetic biology scheme has to
prove its benefits outweigh the risks.
"There are always pros and cons, and we owe people a fair and
balanced assessment."
Click http://tmsnrt.rs/2p4uuBJ for graphic on Betting on synthetic
life
(Reporting by Ben Hirschler; editing by Giles Elgood)
[© 2017 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
Copyright 2017 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
|