| 
		Is the sky blue? Depends on what Donald 
		Trump says 
		 Send a link to a friend 
		
		 [April 07, 2017] 
		By Chris Kahn and James Oliphant 
 NEW YORK/WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Republicans 
		generally agree that politicians should not enrich themselves while 
		running the country. Yet most think it is okay for President Donald 
		Trump to do so.
 
 Democrats largely support the idea of government-run healthcare. But 
		their support plummets when they learn that Trump once backed the idea.
 
 At a time of already deep fissures among American voters on political, 
		cultural and economic issues, Trump further polarizes the public as soon 
		as he wades into the debate, according to the results of a Reuters/Ipsos 
		poll. The poll suggests any effort to reach a consensus on key policy 
		issues could be complicated simply by Trump's involvement.
 
 The survey from Feb. 1 to March 15 of nearly 14,000 people asked 
		respondents to consider a series of statements Trump has made on taxes, 
		crime and the news media, among other issues. In many cases, the data 
		showed that people will orient their opinions according to what they 
		think of Trump.
 
		
		 
		Republicans, for example, were more likely to criticize American 
		exceptionalism – the notion that the United States holds a unique place 
		in history - when told that Trump once said it was insulting to other 
		countries. They were more likely to agree that the country should 
		install more nuclear weapons, and they were more supportive of 
		government spending for infrastructure, when they knew that Trump felt 
		the same way.
 Democrats moved in the opposite direction. They were less supportive of 
		infrastructure spending, less critical of the judiciary and less likely 
		to agree that urban crime was on the rise when they knew that those 
		concerns were shared by Trump.
 
 For a graphic on the poll results, see http://tmsnrt.rs/2o5nbfF
 
 “I’m basically in disagreement with everything he says,” said Howard 
		House, 58, a Democrat from Jacksonville, Florida, who took the poll. 
		“I’ve almost closed my mind to the guy.”
 
 Trump is not the first president to polarize the public. A 1995 poll by 
		the Washington Post found that Democrats appeared to favor legislative 
		action when they thought it was then-President Bill Clinton’s idea, and 
		a 2013 survey by Hart Research Associates showed that both positive and 
		negative attitudes about the 2010 Affordable Care Act intensified when 
		called by its other name, Obamacare.
 
 But previous presidents were more popular than Trump at this point, 
		according to the Gallup polling service, and they may have been better 
		positioned to address the public divide because of it. Gallup had Trump 
		at a 42 percent approval rating on Tuesday. He was as low as 35 percent 
		last week.
 
 That leaves Trump facing a largely disapproving electorate, even as the 
		White House signals that in the coming months it wants to pass a 
		sweeping tax-reform package, a large infrastructure plan, and perhaps 
		try again to supplant the Affordable Care Act.
 
 The White House said that Trump has tried to reach out to those who did 
		not support him during the campaign in an attempt to build political 
		consensus.
 
 “The door to the White House has been open to a variety of people who 
		are willing to come to the table and have honest discussions with the 
		President about the ways we can make our country better,” a White House 
		spokeswoman wrote in an email.
 
		
		 
		
            [to top of second column] | 
            
			 
            
			Supporters of President Trump gather for a rally in Bensalem, 
			Pennsylvania. REUTERS/Mark Makela 
            
			 
			THE HYPER-PARTISAN ERA OF TRUMP
 Poll respondents were split into two groups. Each received nearly 
			identical questions about statements Trump has made in recent years. 
			One group, however, was not told the statements came from Trump.
 
 The poll then asked if people agreed or disagreed with those 
			statements. In a few cases, Trump made little to no impact on the 
			answers. But most of the time the inclusion of his name changed the 
			results.
 
 A series of questions about conflicts of interest produced the 
			biggest swings.
 
 Some 33 percent of Republicans said it was okay if “an official” 
			financially benefits from a government position. However, when a 
			separate group was asked the same question with Trump’s name added 
			in, more than twice as many Republicans – 70 percent – said it was 
			okay.
 
 When interviewed afterward, some respondents said they knew they 
			were making special exceptions for Trump.
 
 Susie Stewart, a 73-year-old healthcare worker from Fort Worth, 
			Texas, said it came down to trust. While most politicians should be 
			forbidden from mixing their personal fortunes with government 
			business, Stewart, who voted for Trump, said the president had 
			earned the right to do so.
 
 "He is a very intelligent man,” Stewart said. “He’s proved himself 
			to be one hell of a manager. A builder. I think he has the business 
			sense to do what’s best for the country.”
 
 On the other side of the political spectrum, House, the Democrat 
			from Florida and a Hillary Clinton supporter, said he also made an 
			exception for Trump. But in this instance it meant that House 
			disagreed with everything Trump supported.
 
			
			 
			If Trump said the sky was blue, “I’m going to go outside and check,” 
			he said.
 It is impossible to say exactly what motivates people to answer a 
			certain way in a political poll, said John Bullock, an expert in 
			partisanship at the University of Texas at Austin.
 
 Some respondents may have looked past the question and answered in a 
			way that they thought would support or oppose Trump, Bullock said. 
			But he said it was also likely that others simply have not thought 
			deeply about the issue and are looking to Trump as a guide for how 
			to answer.
 
 “They think of him either as a man who shares their values or 
			someone who manifestly does not,” Bullock said.
 
 (Editing by Jason Szep and Paul Thomasch)
 
			[© 2017 Thomson Reuters. All rights 
			reserved.] Copyright 2017 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, 
			broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. 
			
			 |