Investors flock to 'macro'
hedge funds, but not only the old guard
Send a link to a friend
[April 10, 2017]
By Maiya Keidan, Svea Herbst-Bayliss and Lawrence Delevingne
LONDON/BOSTON
(Reuters) - "Macro" hedge funds are back in favor with investors seeking
to take a view on U.S. President Donald Trump's economic policies,
European elections, or interest rates, but it is start-up funds rather
than established players which are attracting cash.
Some of the main beneficiaries of the macro revival are managers who cut
their teeth at the big macro firms such as Moore Capital Management,
Brevan Howard and Tudor Investment Corp, which made their names for
outperformance in 2007-2009.
Eric Siegel, head of hedge funds at Citi Private Bank <C.N>, said in
general that macro strategies are likely to thrive. “With volatility
coming back and monetary supply tightening, we believe it could be a
great environment for macro managers,” Siegel said.
Macro funds bet on macroeconomic trends using currencies, bonds, rates
and stock futures. They outperformed the broader industry during the
financial crisis and amassed tens of billions of dollars between 2010
and 2012. But they lost most of those assets between 2013 and 2014 and
also in 2016 for a variety of reasons, including performance.
But macro is back in vogue and was the most popular hedge fund strategy
among investors in the fourth quarter of 2016 and the first two months
of this year, according to industry data providers Preqin and eVestment.
Moore Capital's Louis Moore Bacon, Alan Howard, who co-founded Brevan
Howard, and Paul Tudor Jones of Tudor Investment were among the macro
stars after years of delivering double-digit returns.
But during the lean years, when macro was less in favor, they had to cut
fees and in some cases staff.
Now newcomers, such as Moore Capital spin-out Stone Milliner, are
pulling in cash and producing some strong returns.
Stone Milliner's discretionary global macro closed to new money last
year after taking in over $4 billion in the previous two years.
Moore Capital's assets have fallen slightly from $15 billion in 2012 to
$13.3 billion as of Dec. 31 2016, filings with the U.S. Securities and
Exchange Commission (SEC) showed.
Anglo-Swiss firm Stone Milliner, set up in 2012 by former Moore Capital
portfolio managers Jens-Peter Stein and Kornelius Klobucar, averaged
returns of 8.3 percent between 2014 and 2016, a source told Reuters,
while Moore Capital Management averaged 3.4 percent, a second source
said.
London-based Gemsstock, set up in January 2014 by Moore Capital trader
Darren Read and his co-founder Al Breach, made 12.8 percent on average
over the same period, documents seen by Reuters showed.
Chris Rokos, a Brevan Howard alumnus, raised another $2 billion in
February after returns of 20 percent in 2016.
EDL Capital made gains of 18.4 percent last year after ex-Moore Capital
trader Edouard De Langlade launched the firm in September 2015,
according to a source close to EDL Capital. It has amassed assets of
$450 million to date, he said.
Ben Melkman, who also formerly worked at Brevan Howard until May 2016,
raised over $400 million for his launch in March, SEC filings showed.
Brevan Howard's firm-wide assets fell to $14.6 billion in 2017, from $37
billion in 2012. [http://www.reuters.com/article/uk-brevanhoward-geneva-london-idUSLNE89B01F20121012]
[to top of second column] |
Paul Tudor Jones, founder and chief investment officer of Tudor
Investment Corporation, speaks at the Sohn Investment Conference in
New York, May 5, 2014. REUTERS/Eduardo Munoz
RUSH FOR MACRO
But the old guard are fighting back. Some have been cutting fees and offering
alternatives.
Howard, Brevan Howard's co-founder, last month launched a new fund managed
solely by him, which sources said has already amassed more than $3 billion.
Tudor Investment lowered its management fees to 1.75 percent and performance
fees to 20 percent in February after a reduction last year and Moore Capital cut
the management fee on its Moore Macro Managers fund to 2.5 percent from 3
percent.
Tudor Jones laid off 15 percent of staff in August. The firm's main Tudor BVI
Global Fund started 2017 down 0.6 percent to March 3 after gaining 0.9 percent
in 2016.
Brevan cut its management fees to zero for some current investors in its Master
Fund and its Multi-Strategy fund last September after a similar move from Caxton
Associates.
But for both the old and new macro funds, it is still to be determined what 2017
will hold.
Even
though macro funds are flat on average for the first two months of 2017, making
gains of just 0.38 percent, according to Hedge Fund Research, the popularity of
macro strategies is not in doubt.
A Credit Suisse survey in March of more than 320 institutional investors with
$1.3 trillion in hedge funds showed macro was set to be the favorite strategy of
2017.
Preqin data showed that after pulling assets out of macro for three back-to-back
quarters, investors added $6.4 billion to the strategy in the fourth quarter of
2016 after Trump's win.
eVestment data showed that macro funds have pulled in $4.4 billion in the first
two months of 2017, demonstrating a turnaround from 2016 when investors took
$9.8 billion out of macro after withdrawing $10 billion in 2013 and $19.1
billion in 2014.
"I don't think macro is dead. Managers who can be nimble and are able to look
outside the large liquid asset classes can still find great opportunities," Erin
Browne, head of Global Macro Investments at UBS O’Connor, said.
Representatives at Tudor did not immediately respond to a request to comment.
Moore Capital had no comment. A spokesman at Brevan declined to comment.
(Editing by Jane Merriman)
[© 2017 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2017 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
|