Gorsuch era on U.S. high court begins
with his first three cases
Send a link to a friend
[April 17, 2017]
By Lawrence Hurley
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. Supreme
Court, back at full strength after being shorthanded for 14 months, gets
down to business on Monday with President Donald Trump's appointee Neil
Gorsuch hearing arguments in his first three cases as part of a restored
conservative majority.
The cases involve employment and property disputes and the timing of
securities class-action lawsuits. None of the three is a blockbuster
likely to split the court ideologically. But Gorsuch will be on the
bench for one of the court's biggest cases of its current term on
Wednesday in a Missouri church's lawsuit that tests the limits of
religious rights.
One of the lawyers due to argue the second case before the justices on
Monday will be a familiar face to Gorsuch. Neal Katyal, who served as
acting solicitor general in Democratic former President Barack Obama's
Justice Department, heartily endorsed Gorsuch's nomination, even
testifying at his Senate Judiciary Committee confirmation hearing.
Katyal's role in the confirmation process means Gorsuch may have to
decide on whether or not to recuse himself in that case.
Gorsuch formally joined the court on April 10 after being confirmed by
the Republican-led Senate over broad Democratic opposition three days
earlier, and took part in discussions among the justices on which cases
to take up.
The court will have its full complement of nine justices, five
conservatives and four liberals, for arguments for the first time since
the death of long-serving conservative Antonin Scalia in February 2016.
Gorsuch, at 49 the youngest new justice in a quarter century, served for
a decade on the Denver-based 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals before
Trump nominated him in January. Trump was able to fill Scalia's vacancy
only because Senate Republicans last year refused to consider Democratic
former President Barack Obama's nominee Merrick Garland.
The first of Monday's three one-hour oral arguments is a employment
dispute in which a former U.S. Census Bureau worker argues he was forced
into retirement against his will.
[to top of second column] |
U.S. Supreme Court nominee judge Neil Gorsuch testifies during the
third day of his Senate Judiciary Committee confirmation hearing on
Capitol Hill in Washington, U.S. on March 22, 2017. REUTERS/Jonathan
Ernst/File Photo
The second involves whether a developer can intervene in a lawsuit
brought by a property owner against the town of Chester, New York
over its refusal to give him permission to build on his land.
Katyal, who has argued numerous cases before the high court,
represents the town of Chester. Republicans backing Gorsuch's
confirmation often cited liberal Katyal's endorsement as evidence
that the judge enjoyed support across the political spectrum.
Testifying before the Judiciary Committee, Katyal said, "I have seen
Judge Gorsuch in action, hearing cases. And I have studied his
written opinions. This is a first rate intellect, and a fair and
decent man."
Katyal is also scheduled to argue before the justices on April 25 on
behalf of Bristol-Myers Squibb Co <BMY.N> in a case over
out-of-state injury claims.
The third case on Monday is a dispute over whether certain
securities class-action lawsuits can be barred because they were
filed too late.
(Reporting by Lawrence Hurley; Additional reporting by Andrew Chung;
Editing by Will Dunham)
[© 2017 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
Copyright 2017 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. |