Fed moving appropriately;
ECB too hesitant: El-Erian
Send a link to a friend
[April 28, 2017]
By Divya Chowdhury and Billy Chan
(Reuters) -
The
U.S. Federal Reserve is moving appropriately on the path to unwind asset
purchases and normalize rates, while the European Central Bank (ECB) may
be too hesitant, said Mohamed El-Erian, chief economic advisor at the
Allianz Group.
The Fed, ECB and Bank of Japan (BOJ) need policymakers to step up to
take action on structural reforms to be more effective, El-Erian told
the Reuters Global Markets Forum in an interview on Friday.
Following are edited excerpts from the conversation:
Q: Are central banks taking the right route to unwind their asset
purchases and normalize rates?
A: When it comes to taking the foot off the unconventional stimulus
pedal, the Fed appears to be moving appropriately. The ECB may be
showing a little too much hesitancy. Importantly, the two of them – as
well as the Bank of Japan – need other policymakers, with tools better
suited for the task at hand, to step up to the plate more forcefully –
especially when it comes to pro-growth structural reforms, more balanced
demand management, better cross-border policy coordination and, in some
isolated cases, targeted debt reduction (e.g., Greece).
Otherwise, it will be challenging for the central banks to deliver a
"beautiful normalization," adopting a phrase from Bridgewater’s Ray
Dalio. As you know, I have worried that the central banks have been "the
only game in town" for too long already.
Q: Your thoughts on Fed's balance sheet trimming? Certain sections of
the market, for instance, believe balance sheet reduction should only
start once the Fed funds rate is near 2 percent.
A: Yes, I agree. My own inclination would be to go some significant way
in normalizing rates before initiating an active reduction in the Fed's
balance sheet. Remember, this is unchartered territory. There are
several uncertainties, so it is extra important to sequence carefully
and implement in a measured fashion.
Q: How many U.S. rate-hikes are you expecting in 2017?
A: I expect that, absent a major negative shock, there will be a total
of three rate hikes in 2017 -- so two more in the remainder of the year.
Q: What are your thoughts on the relationship between Trump and Chinese
President Xi Jinping, which is proving to be much friendlier than
expected given Trump's campaign rhetoric, and what does that mean for
markets or investments? [nL1N1I0067]
A: Yes, it looks like the two leaders had a good meeting in Washington,
establishing a working relationship that appears to be deepening. This
is very important as you are talking about the most important bilateral
economic relationship in the world – between the largest economies.
As such, it has a notable influence on markets/investment. The economic
and financial relationships between the U.S. and China are considerable
and multifaceted. Indeed, given the current scale and scope of
inter-connectedness, the most likely long-term outcomes are either
win-win or lose-lose. And the dynamics involved could well be those of
multiple equilibria. As such, the stakes are high for the global economy
and markets.
[to top of second column] |
The logo of the European Central Bank (ECB) is pictured outside its
headquarters in Frankfurt, Germany, December 8, 2016. REUTERS/Ralph
Orlowski/File Photo
Q: Do
you think the deleveraging efforts in China are working?
A: The deleveraging process is proving to be a very gradual process.
Fortunately, China has time and the pockets of excessive leverage are
containable. But there will be the periodic stress, and it’s one that requires
timely policy responses.
Q: What is your view on the dollar? Could it get a further boost from U.S.
President Donald Trump's policies?
A: A lot depends on policies. Specifically, the dollar would get a boost from
the implementation of pro-growth measures that would also allow the Federal
Reserve to normalize both interest rates and its balance sheet. As such, foreign
exchange traders should keep a close eye on progress on tax reform,
de-regulation and infrastructure in particular.
Q: Do you think inflation, which many thought would see a spike in 2017, has
already reversed?
A: No. I think the recent U.S. reversal will prove temporary. I suspect that
there is some more inflation in the pipeline in 2017 here, though I would not
call it a spike – rather a slow move up.
Q: Would you be a buyer or seller of USD/JPY if the tensions on the Korean
Peninsula escalate? How does that reconcile with BOJ’s stance?
A: An
escalation of the geo-political tensions you postulate in your question would
most probably lead to an appreciation of the dollar versus the Japanese yen –
related to economic, financial and technical reasons. I suspect that, in such a
scenario, and it is one of many, the Bank of Japan would allow the currency to
depreciate rather than take measures to meaningfully counter the move.
Q: Would you be a buyer of gold in this period of heightened geopolitical
tensions? Or do you see it underperforming in a rising interest rate
environment?
A: Much depends on what else I have in my portfolio. Some allocation to gold
makes sense here.
Q: Would you say the populist wave highlighted by the Brexit vote and the U.S.
election is already waning given the French election left centrist Emmanuel
Macron in the lead? And what is your view on the euro as a whole?
A: No, I think the anti-establishment phenomenon is still with us. Remember,
Emmanuel Macron campaigned against the mainstream parties. In fact, he does not
have a party – just a "movement." What we are witnessing is the cumulative
effect of too many years of low and insufficiently inclusive growth.
(Editing by Neil Fullick)
[© 2017 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2017 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. |