Google search volumes for queries about suicide were 19 percent
higher than expected in the 19 days following the show’s release,
reflecting 900,000 to 1.5 million more searches than there otherwise
would have been, researchers report today in JAMA Internal Medicine.
“The more someone contemplates suicide, the more likely they are to
act,” said lead study author John Ayers of San Diego State
University in California. “Searches often foreshadow offline
behaviors.”
Many of the searches in the study focused on suicidal thoughts.
For example, searches for “how to commit suicide” were 26 percent
higher than expected after “13 Reasons Why” debuted, while searches
for “commit suicide” were 18 percent higher than anticipated and
queries on “how to kill yourself” were 9 percent higher.
At the same time, searches seeking help also increased.
Queries for “suicide hotline number” were 21 percent higher than
expected after the series came out, and searches for “suicide
prevention” were 23 percent higher than anticipated.
Searches for “teen suicide” were 34 percent higher than expected,
the study also found.
In “13 Reasons Why,” high school student Hannah Baker kills herself
and leaves behind cassette tapes describing the events that led to
her death, which is shown in graphic detail in the series finale.
The show deals with rape, drunk driving and bullying.
After its debut, many mental health experts raised concerns that
watching the series could trigger copycat suicides, particularly
among certain vulnerable teens who might already be struggling with
depression or suicidal thoughts.
The series carries a TV-MA rating and Netflix added additional
content warnings and information on suicide prevention resources in
response to concerns about the series (here:
http://13reasonswhy.info/#usa). Netflix also encouraged parents to
watch the show with teens and offered talking points (here: http://bit.ly/2quCH3Z).
"We always believed this show would increase discussion around this
tough subject matter,” Netflix told Reuters Health in an emailed
statement. “This is an interesting quasi experimental study that
confirms this.”
Still, the show could have gone farther to avoid triggering suicidal
thoughts or suicide attempts, said Kimberly McManama O’Brien,
co-author of an accompanying editorial and a psychiatry researcher
at Harvard Medical School in Boston.
[to top of second column] |
“The choice to graphically depict the suicide death of the star of
the series was a controversial decision,” McManama O’Brien said by
email. “Research has shown that pictures or detailed descriptions of
how or where a person died by suicide can be a factor in vulnerable
individuals.”
To assess how much online searches about suicide changed after “13
Reasons Why,” researchers used an algorithm based on daily search
trends from January 15 to March 30, the last day before the show’s
premiere.
Then, they looked at search volumes from the March 31 debut date
through April 18, a cutoff chosen to exclude any influence from the
suicide of American football player Aaron Hernandez on April 19.
For 12 of the 19 days following March 31, all suicide searches rose
more than expected, ranging from 15 percent to 44 percent higher
than anticipated.
Out of 20 common queries related to suicide that researchers
examined, 17 had higher than expected search volume during the study
period.
It’s unclear whether any query preceded an actual suicide attempt,
the authors note.
Because the study suggests the show increased both suicide awareness
and suicidal thoughts, more warnings could be added to current and
future seasons, the researchers conclude.
Media depictions of suicide should follow guidelines laid out by the
World Health Organization to avoid triggering suicide attempts,
Ayers recommended.
“Showing the suicide act, making the victim's suicide the central
focus, or blaming others for the victim’s suicide are all
discouraged,” Ayers said.
Shows that portray suicide should direct viewers to resources for
help, such as the National Suicide Prevention Lifeline
(1-800-273-TALK), he added.
SOURCE: http://bit.ly/2tQQymh JAMA Internal Medicine, online July
31, 2017.
[© 2017 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2017 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. |