While such rules are common elsewhere in the world and adhered to by
large pharmaceutical companies, they are not set in stone in India,
where campaigners have long demanded a crackdown on unethical
selling practices. These have included gifts ranging from electrical
appliances to foreign junkets to encourage doctors and pharmacists
to prescribe and stock certain medications.
Currently, India has only a voluntary marketing code that critics
say is ineffective.
"In India, corruption and bribery of doctors is widespread," said
Samiran Nundy, one of India's leading gastrointestinal surgeons.
"I've seen a range of ways in which this works, from presents to
doctors to paying for them to attend conferences in places like
Thailand."
"It's great that marketing rules are coming into place, but there
are a huge number of regulations in India that are not enforced," he
added. "I hope that these will be enforced."
Apart from limiting marketing spending, the draft proposal drawn up
the Department of Pharmaceuticals and being reviewed by India's law
ministry would also forbid drugmakers from making misleading claims
around the curative abilities and efficacy of drugs.
The rules also impose strict limitations on the number of trial
samples offered to doctors.
An official at the Department of Pharmaceuticals declined to comment
on the specifics of the draft, but told Reuters that the order was
being reviewed.
The official, who asked not to be named, said no timeline has yet
been set on the implementation of the new rules.
According to the draft seen by Reuters, a failure to abide by the
rules will result in a marketing ban on a drugmaker for more than a
year depending on the degree of the violation, and the confiscation
of "all packets of the highest selling brand of drugs" made by that
company.
The seized drugs will be handed over for use at government hospitals
across the country.
Companies can turn a marketing suspension order into a cash fine,
according to the proposal. They will have to pay penalties of
between 500,000 rupees ($7,800) and 100,000,000 rupees ($1.56
million) to reverse a marketing suspension order, depending on the
severity.
[to top of second column] |
MANDATORY CODE
In a letter last year, Tapan Sen, a member of India's upper house of
Parliament, urged the government to act on drafting a mandatory code
on the marketing of pharmaceuticals, citing irregular practices by
several companies.
Indian media reported that the letter said the country's largest
drugmaker, Sun Pharma, Abbott India and privately-held Macleods
Pharmaceuticals were among drugmakers found to have sent doctors on
"pleasure trips."
Abbott said at the time that it had a strict policy against
providing gifts and other incentives to doctors, while Macleods
refuted the allegations.
A Sun spokesman told Reuters the company organizes 'continuous
medical education' programs to educate doctors, not promote its
products, and these are compliant with the voluntary marketing
guidelines set by the government in 2015.
The current draft says companies will be allowed to organize
screening camps or awareness campaigns at public health centers, but
it bars advertising by stealth and mandates that doctors involved in
such events be paid commensurate to their average daily income.
To ensure implementation of the rules, an 'Ethics Compliance
Officer' of the rank of joint secretary to the Indian government
would be appointed.
Pharmaceutical marketing practices have long been a subject of
controversy globally. In India, where health insurance is scarce and
many rely on pharmacists for medical advice, critics say sketchy
practices have led to the over-prescription of strong cocktail
drugs, causing drug-resistance.
GlaxoSmithKline was battered by a bribery scandal in China that
landed it with a record $490 million fine in 2014.
It went on to slash the number of sales reps and overhaul its
business globally, stopping sales-based incentives for drug reps and
reducing paid junkets for doctors.
(Editing by Clara Ferreira Marques, Euan Rocha and Raju
Gopalakrishnan)
[© 2017 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2017 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. |