With budget cuts looming, U.S. aid chief
vows to do more with less
Send a link to a friend
[August 14, 2017]
By Lesley Wroughton
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Facing potentially
deep budget cuts to U.S. foreign aid, new USAID administrator Mark Green
says he needs to do more with less and prove to President Donald Trump
that development assistance can further his "America First" agenda.
In a first meeting with Trump back in January, Green made his pitch to
the then president-elect, drawing from his experience in Central America
to explain how U.S.-funded programs there could help slow the number of
immigrants trying to enter the United States illegally.
"I said 'Mr. President-elect, I believe our development tools can help
us achieve just about every one of your strategic priorities,'" Green
told Reuters in his first interview since starting last week as head of
the U.S. Agency for International Development.
Green had previously worked on U.S-supported projects with indigenous
mayors in Guatemala, Honduras and El Salvador to improve living
conditions "so kids hopefully don't go 1,000 miles through the worst
conditions imaginable and jump the border."
"It works and is a great way to use development," he said, sitting in a
still bare office at USAID headquarters blocks from the White House.
Green brings a unique resume to the job: a former four-term Republican
congressman from Wisconsin who served as U.S. Ambassador to Tanzania
under President George W. Bush. In his last job as head of the
International Republican Institute, he helped promote governance and
democracy overseas.
His time on Capitol Hill will be key to his new job. In a sign of his
good standing there, Green's nomination had support across the political
spectrum, as well as among aid groups.
Trump staked out his position on foreign aid on the campaign trail,
casting it as a waste of U.S. tax dollars. And now his administration
has proposed slashing the budget for foreign aid by a third, which could
gut programs across a range of issues including health, governance,
gender and education.
But U.S. foreign assistance has traditionally garnered bipartisan
support in Congress, which controls the aid purse strings. Green has
stronger relations with lawmakers than his predecessors, who battled
Congress on funding and objectives.
[to top of second column] |
"What's very different for Mark Green is that his strongest allies
are on the Hill," said Scott Morris, a senior fellow at the Center
for Global Development in Washington. "Where he faces headwinds are
with both the White House and the State Department."
"There is a real potential for conflicts in basic philosophy about
what USAID does," added Morris.
Green is nevertheless sanguine about prospects for a downsized,
budget-constrained USAID.
"We can't do everything," he said. "The resources are limited, so we
have to prioritize."
Green takes over an agency that has already been through waves of
reform in the last decade, adapting to shifting global development
patterns featuring deep-pocket philanthropic groups, more
private-sector investment in emerging economies, and the rise of
China as a financier in the developing world.
New demands have emerged with an unprecedented refugee crisis from
wars in Syria and Iraq, along with famine in Africa, and growing
violent extremism.
"USAID's humanitarian work is unrivaled, it is mobilization of
American generosity, and it will continue," Green said, adding that
U.S. assistance should both help in times of crisis and prevent
crises from occurring.
He wants U.S. foreign assistance to focus on results to show
Americans that their tax-dollars are being put to good use.
"I am going to ask every program to show me how it is moving us
closer to the day when people can lead themselves," said Green. "If
it is not helping, they're going to have to tell me why."
(Reporting by Lesley Wroughton; Editing by Mary Milliken)
[© 2017 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
Copyright 2017 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
|