Parenthood doesn’t appear to influence hours for men in these
couples, however.
“Before these couples have children, male and female physicians work
similar amounts of hours,” said senior study author Dr. Anupam Jena
of Harvard Medical School and Massachusetts General Hospital in
Boston.
“With the arrival of children, female physicians reduce their work
hours by nearly 20 percent, or ten hours, per week,” Jena said by
email. “Male physicians don’t reduce their hours at all.”
For the study, researchers estimated weekly work hours for married,
dual-physician couples based on nationally representative data
collected by the U.S. census for approximately 3 million households
annually.
They included data for individuals in couples where both partners
reported working as a physician. They excluded same-sex couples and
physicians under age 25 or over 50, in order to focus on gender
differences in work hours during childbearing years.
They also excluded parents of newborns, to focus on changes in work
hours beyond any temporary leave or reduced hours in the first year
after babies were born.
The final analysis included survey data collected from 2000 to 2015
on 4,934 married couples.
Women were 38 years old on average, while men were typically around
39 years old.
Among couples without children, men worked an average of 57 hours a
week and women worked about 52 hours, researchers report in JAMA
Internal Medicine.
Compared to women without kids, women with toddlers aged 1 to 2
years worked about 41.5 hours, more than 10 hours less, the study
found.
Men with toddlers worked almost two hours less than men without
kids, but the difference wasn’t big enough to rule out the
possibility that it was due to chance.
As children got older, there still wasn’t a meaningful difference
between work hours for men with and without kids. For women,
meanwhile, the lag in hours with children persisted.
[to top of second column] |
The study wasn’t a controlled experiment designed to prove whether
or how parenthood might influence work hours for physicians or other
married couples.
It’s possible that women might also gravitate toward specialties
that demand fewer hours in order to make time for children, the
researchers suggest. Social expectations for women to reduce work
hours to care for children might also explain the results, the
authors note.
“Our identity and professional roles are highly socialized,” said
Patricia Davidson, a workforce researcher and dean of the Johns
Hopkins School of Nursing in Baltimore.
Women are by far the greatest proportion of caregivers, and this
role can also include a wide variety of activities, Davidson, who
wasn’t involved in the study, said by email.
The different impact of parenthood for men and women might reflect
differing perspectives on work, she said.
“There is also potentially a feminized view of working where getting
the work done is more important than the trophy of hours worked,”
Davidson said.
Parenthood’s disproportionate impact on women’s work hours might
also mask unequal access to management positions that come with
added responsibilities.
“There is also potential that the extra work hours were related to
leadership and administrative roles to which it is documented women
have less access,” Davidson said.
SOURCE: http://bit.ly/2wvu3Ze JAMA Internal Medicine, online August
21, 2017.
[© 2017 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2017 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. |