“When we look at studies of regret after cancer treatment one area
that is always mentioned is reproductive regrets. Women come back
and say they never got the chance to discuss their fertility and now
it is gone,” Dr. Donald Dizon, clinical co-director of gynecologic
oncology at the Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, told
Reuters Health.
“My hope is that this study reinforces the importance of bringing up
fertility to all patients of reproductive age regardless of
prognosis,” said Dizon, who wasn’t involved in the research.
For the new analysis, Dr. Shanna Logan at Kids Cancer Center, Sydney
Children’s Hospital in Australia and colleagues examined data from
23 previous studies conducted in seven countries from 2007 to 2016.
Across the studies, the likelihood that health care providers and
patients discussed fertility issues depended on the provider’s
specialty, the patient’s gender and age, and the provider’s attitude
and knowledge of fertility preservation techniques.
In one study included in the review, 93 percent of clinicians said
they routinely discuss fertility issues with their patients, but
medical records showed that only 74 percent actually did so.
In another study, clinical nurse specialists discussed with patients
the possibility that treatment could adversely affect fertility 68
percent of the time, while only 40 percent of surgeons reported
being involved in such discussions.
Fewer than half of clinicians said they referred patients to a
reproductive specialist when patients had fertility concerns. One
study found that only 61 percent of clinicians were aware of an
established referral pathway to a fertility clinic.
Cancer and cancer treatment either temporarily or permanently
affects the fertility potential of 50 to 75 percent of cancer
survivors. The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
recommends that healthcare providers discuss as early as possible
the risk of infertility and fertility preservation options with all
post-pubescent patients who will undergo cancer treatment.
Logan told Reuters Health by email that young female patients
reported greater barriers to receiving appropriate oncofertility
support than male patients.
Sperm banking is more often easily available than female
preservation techniques, she noted.
“At times patients report that clinicians felt embarrassed having
these conversations or did not place great importance on the topic
of fertility,” Logan said.
[to top of second column] |
She emphasized that patients want both verbal and written
information related to their age and tumor type.
Logan believes oncofertility support is not uniform because
clinicians don’t all have the same up-to-date information about
resources available.
Dizon agrees. In a telephone interview, he said oncologists don’t
get trained in reproductive methods so they’re not the ones to
explain them.
“I wish I could say I was shocked that oncofertility support is not
offered routinely, but I’m not,” Dizon added.
Oncologists who aren’t comfortable with these discussions should
refer patients to other experts, he said. But outside large medical
centers, he noted, these services may not be widely available.
Dr. Pasquale Patrizio, director of the Yale Fertility Center and
Fertility Preservation Program in New Haven, Connecticut, told
Reuters Health by phone, “We are making good progress in having
patients be referred to a reproductive endocrinologist in a timely
manner, but we still have a lot of work to do.”
Fertility preservation must not compromise the patient’s chance for
a cure, Patrizio said. He only needs 10 days to plan a fertility
preservation strategy like collecting or retrieving eggs. When a
patient needs to begin treatment immediately, ovarian tissue can be
cryopreserved in 48 hours.
Logan said, “Providing oncofertility care at the time of diagnosis
and through till survivorship is integral in reducing later
psychological distress and lowered quality of life seen in cancer
survivors with impaired fertility.”
SOURCE: http://bit.ly/2vHdSCZ Psycho-Oncology, online August 24,
2017.
[© 2017 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2017 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. |