U.S. states gird for fight as Trump
targets consumer finance watchdog
Send a link to a friend
[December 02, 2017]
By Lisa Lambert
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Pennsylvania's
Attorney General is leading the charge among his Democratic peers
preparing to shore up protections for borrowers and savers while
President Donald Trump follows through on a pledge to defang a powerful
consumer finance watchdog.
Since he was sworn in January, Democrat Josh Shapiro has built up his
own consumer finance unit in preparation for when Republican Trump's
officials take over the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB).
The unit is staffed with more than a dozen people and led by a former
senior CFPB attorney. Shapiro and this team have already filed cases
against Navient <NAVI.O>, a student loan servicer, which is accused of
deceiving borrowers in order to drive up profits, and are leading a
48-state investigation into hacking at Equifax <EFX.N>, a consumer
credit bureau.
"We’re demonstrating a capacity to handle these big, complex
consumer financial protection cases," Shapiro told Reuters, adding that
attorneys general from both parties have asked about how they can "mimic
our efforts".
Navient has said it operates within federal laws and rules on student
loans, and has contested similar charges brought by the CFPB in court.
An Equifax spokesperson said the company cannot comment on pending
litigation, "but we remain focused on helping our customers, as well as
their employees and consumers, to navigate this situation."
Shapiro expects his case load will grow, particularly now that Trump has
installed his budget director and fierce CFPB critic, Mick Mulvaney, as
temporary chief of the agency.
The press office at the Office of Management and Budget, which is
currently handling public relations for CFPB, said it was too early to
comment on Democratic attorneys' plans.
“However, of course we will carry out what we are statutorily obliged to
enforce,” spokesman John Czwartacki said.
Created in the wake of the 2007-2009 financial crisis to crack down on
predatory financial practices, the CFBP has long been criticized by
Republicans, including Trump, who say it is far too powerful and burdens
lenders with red tape.
POWERFUL WEAPON
Shapiro is part of a group of Democratic attorneys general from powerful
and large states such as California and New York who disagree with
Trump's call for financial deregulation.
Since Trump's inauguration in January, those top law enforcement
officials have sued the administration at least 25 times over its
crackdown on immigration and dismantling of regulations across a range
of areas from energy to education.
When it comes to financial consumer protection state attorneys general
wield an additional potentially powerful weapon.
A little-known provision of the 2010 Dodd-Frank law, which created the
CFPB, gives them the authority to enforce the agency's rules and its
broad ban on "unfair, deceptive and abusive" practices beyond state
lines.
States have rarely used those provisions while Richard Cordray,
appointed by President Barack Obama and known for aggressively pursuing
financial firms, was in charge of the watchdog.
But with his departure last week, Mulvaney freezing new rulemakings and
hiring and a permanent successor expected to loosen the watchdog's
regulation and enforcement, top attorneys in states such as Pennsylvania
and California say they are preparing to get more active.
"If we have to do this with just states that makes it more difficult but
that doesn’t make it impossible," said California Attorney General
Xavier Becerra, a Democrat.
[to top of second column] |
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Director Mick Mulvaney arrives
to speak to the media at the U.S. Consumer Financial Protection
Bureau (CFPB), where he began work earlier in the day after being
named acting director by U.S. President Donald Trump in Washington,
DC, U.S. on November 27, 2017. REUTERS/Joshua Roberts/File Photo
One difficulty for states wanting to pursue federal enforcement
cases and go after financial firms across state lines, is that, by
law, they must notify the CFPB, said Ori Lev, consumer financial
services partner at law firm Mayer Brown.
If they proceed without the CFPB' blessing or if the agency changes
its mind about a case, then the agency could challenge them in
federal court, and they would most likely have to defer to the CFPB,
said C. Boyden Gray, a founding partner of Boyden Gray & Associates,
who works with the conservative Federalist Society on tracking
regulation.
Still, attorneys general have jurisdiction to sue institutions
operating in their states under state consumer protection laws and
they could join forces to pursue cases nationally. Attorneys general
contacted by Reuters and the Democratic Attorneys General
Association, representing 22 officials, or nearly half the top state
attorneys in the country, said they were prepared to take on more
cases.
Washington Attorney General Bob Ferguson said his office's consumer
finance division now had 27 attorneys, compared with 11 four years
ago.
"Consequently, we are well positioned to use all the tools available
to us to protect Washingtonians if a new leader of the CFPB does not
share director Cordray’s vigor for protecting consumers,” the
Democrat said.
Before the consumer watchdog was created, states often took the lead
in cases involving consumer lenders.
As Ohio's attorney general, Cordray, for example, led the
investigation of financial firms which precipitated the financial
crisis, winning more than $2 billion in settlements for the state
and its pension funds.
Consumer advocacy groups have generally applauded the work of both
the CFPB and the states on consumer protections, but some Republican
attorneys general have sided with Trump on the need to rein in the
federal watchdog.
In a Nov. 27 letter to Trump, Republican attorneys from West
Virginia, Texas, Alabama, Arkansas and Oklahoma said Mulvaney would
help curb “the CFPB’s practice of overreaching regulation that harms
the interests of consumers and small financial institutions.”
Anticipating more state activity, Maria Earley, partner at the law
firm Reed Smith, has been advising clients facing CFPB charges
against stalling in hopes the watchdog will become more lenient
under Trump.
“You may want to litigate to run out the clock, but you’re going to
have six, seven, eight states who will start looking into you,”
Earley said, adding she has settled three CFPB cases for clients
since Trump took office. Reuters could not independently verify this
number.
Michelle Rogers, a partner with Buckley Sandler, said Wall Street
may end up with increased regulatory complexity rather than relief
as the state attorneys step in.
"They are more nimble than a big federal agency. They have their own
staff, and their own agenda, and they can send out a subpoena on a
whim on a broader set of issues," she said.
(This story corrects 18th paragraph to attribute idea to C. Boyden
Gray, instead of Ori Lev)
(Editing by Carmel Crimmins and Tomasz Janowski)
[© 2017 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.]
Copyright 2017 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. |