|
 And other doctors agree that publishing your resuscitation
preference via a simple tattoo is not the best idea compared to
having a living will or healthcare directive readily available.
The 70-year-old had "Do Not Resuscitate" on his chest - complete
with an apparent signature and the word "not" underlined.
But that failed to convince doctors to withhold treatment after he
was brought to Miami's Jackson Memorial Hospital drunk, dying and
unconscious on a Saturday morning.
A tattoo might seem like a clear way to make your wishes known, and
doctors themselves often joke about inking "DNR" on their chest.
In this case, "When the guy comes in, we looked at the tattoo and we
said, 'We've always talked about this, but we've never seen one.'
And then it struck us. We had to think about whether this was real
or not," said Dr. Gregory Holt, coauthor of the case report in The
New England Journal of Medicine. "Suddenly this novelty we've always
joked about became a pressing decision. So it got real for us real
fast."
The problem with a tattoo: it's a little too permanent.
Sometimes patients change their mind about what kind of treatment
they're willing to endure in a health crisis, Holt told Reuters
Health by phone.
For example, "When something happens and people can't breathe, they
just want to breathe well. So a lot of times people want to reverse
their code status," he said.
Holt's other concern at the time was whether the tattoo was done
when the patient was drunk, or acting on a whim.
Dr. Lori Cooper, now an endocrinologist in private practice in
Seattle, came face-to-face with the problem as a chief resident at
California Pacific Medical Center in San Francisco. A 59-year-old
patient with "D.N.R." tattooed on his chest told her he wanted to be
resuscitated if he developed cardiac or respiratory arrest.
His tattoo was there because he lost a bet playing poker. He
declined the suggestion to have it removed, saying he didn't think
anyone would take it seriously. Cooper reported the case in 2012 in
the Journal of General Internal Medicine.
"We deal with code status so much and everyone says, 'I'm just going
to tattoo it on myself.' But that. . . creates a lot of confusion,"
she told Reuters Health by phone. "It can change with the person's
health at the time, or their age, and you have to ask if it reflects
their wishes down the road."
"It's not a great idea," she said.
In her patient, resuscitation never became an issue. But for Holt's
patient, the hospital had to scramble to confirm that his tattoo
reflected his wishes.
[to top of second column] |
Initially, the Holt team worked to keep him alive, "but in the
beginning we didn't do everything. We left it a little bit open"
while consulting with ethicists, who suggested withholding
treatment, Holt said.
Eventually, another do-not-resuscitate form filled out by the
patient was located and he was allowed to die without extraordinary
efforts being made.
"The burden really was on the doctors and the health care providers
to prove that it wasn't his wish, rather than to prove that it was
his wish," said Dr. Gary Winzelberg, director of the Hospice and
Palliative Medicine Fellowship Program at the University of North
Carolina at Chapel Hill, who was not involved in either case.
If people feel strongly and want a DNR tattoo, "They should have
some advanced directive, or power of attorney, or a medical order,
or some other type of order that providers will find if they go
looking," said Rebecca Walker of the Center for Bioethics at UNC.
"We run into this even in with people with forms," Winzelberg told
Reuters Health by phone. "How certain are we that this is their
current wish today? Unless a family member or loved one can tell us
otherwise, we need to respect people's wishes."
Because living wills and healthcare directives can get misplaced,
loved ones may not be immediately available, and people can become
critically ill far from home, doctors say there's not a foolproof
system.
Holt said the country might want to follow in the footsteps of
Oregon, where an online registry allows people to record their
wishes and allows emergency rooms to quickly find those requests.
Ideally, such a registry would use fingerprints and facial
recognition software so an emergency department can speedily
identify the latest preferences of an unconscious patient, he said.
"You could even have a video, so you know someone didn't get the
password and change the preferences because they wanted an
inheritance."
SOURCES: http://bit.ly/2zW6haY and http://bit.ly/2kiYCwp The New
England Journal of Medicine, online November 29, 2017
[© 2017 Thomson Reuters. All rights
reserved.] Copyright 2017 Reuters. All rights reserved. This material may not be published,
broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. |
