State licensing requirements are
often irrational, inconsistent and do little to protect the public, while
imposing heavy burdens on residents trying to earn a living. And Illinois is no
exception.
That’s according to new research from the nonpartisan Institute for Justice, or
IJ.
Occupational licensing is often irrational, inconsistent and costly
IJ released a report in November that examines the licensing of 102 lower-income
occupations among the 50 states and Washington, D.C. These occupations include
jobs such as manicurist, locksmith and barber. Researchers ranked states
according to the number of occupations licensed, as well as the burden imposed
by the licensing requirements, measured by factors such as the number of days of
education and experience required, the number of exams license applicants must
take, and the amount of license-related fees.
With No. 51 being the least restrictive and No. 1 being the most, Illinois at
No. 39 performed better than most states for the number of occupations it
licenses and the burden of its licensing requirements. California, on the other
hand, topped the list as the “most broadly and onerously licensed state,” while
Wyoming ranked No. 51 as the least restrictive state overall for licensing.
But the overall ranking belies Illinois’ particularly harsh restrictions on a
number of seemingly arbitrary occupations.
The IJ report found significant variance among the states in both the jobs
licensed and the burdens imposed on those seeking licenses, which indicates much
of licensing has little to do with protecting the public from harm.
For example, Illinois requires sign language interpreters to pay a $900 fee,
complete over four years of education and pass two exams to obtain a license.
However, 29 states do not license this profession at all. Among the minority of
states that license sign language interpreters, the average fees are $661, and
the average education requirement is just under three years.
The IJ authors note that licensing burdens bear little relation to the public
health and safety dangers posed by insufficiently trained or supervised
professionals. The report gives the example of emergency medical technicians, or
EMTs, which all 50 states and Washington, D.C., license. Although EMTs, who are
first responders at accident and disaster sites, can administer oxygen, start
IVs, treat wounds and perform artificial resuscitation, 73 other professions
have heavier average license burdens. In Illinois, a cosmetologist must complete
350 days of educational training, but an EMT can be licensed after just 37.
Given the inconsistent and irrational treatment of occupational licenses, it is
not surprising that these regimes often originate and are perpetuated for
protectionist reasons.
In many cases, state lawmakers institute licensing requirements in response to
lobbying by those already working in a given field, rather than because of
consumers’ concerns. The report notes that licenses primarily benefit the
licensed workers themselves through reduced competition, as it limits the
ability of new workers to enter the field. This allows existing workers to
charge higher prices for their services.
Illinois should reduce licensing burdens
While Illinois on average has less broad and less onerous licensing requirements
than most other states, it should do everything possible to remove or reduce
unnecessary burdens on those trying to earn a living.
[to top of second column] |
As the IJ report shows,
the least intrusive way to ensure professionals are qualified to
practice in their fields is through market competition. In this era
of online reviews and consumer resource outlets, consumers can
punish poor skills and shoddy service and reward exemplary work more
effectively than ever. Other market-based ways to communicate
quality and value and protect against risk include service providers
sharing information about their work from third parties, voluntary
professional certification and maintenance and voluntary bonding and
insurance.
In cases in which
voluntary, market-based mechanisms are inadequate to protect the
public from real threats posed by poorly done work, the IJ authors
recommend that whenever possible, policymakers intervene in ways
that stop short of licensure. These options range from allowing
consumer lawsuits for malpractice or defective work, to requiring
inspections and insurance, to mandating that practitioners register
with or become certified by the state. Among government
interventions, licensure should be a last resort.
To address problems with
the current licensure regime, Illinois policymakers should review
each occupation the state licenses and examine whether licensure is
necessary to protect the public from widespread, demonstrated harm
that could occur from the unlicensed practice of the occupation.
Policymakers should question whether the occupation is practiced
safely without licensure in other states, too.
To reduce real harms or risks, policymakers should start with the
least restrictive method, such as relying on private certifying
organizations to designate competent practitioners or voluntary
bonding or insurance. Only when harm cannot be mitigated by
nongovernmental means should government get involved. And even in
those cases, policymakers should start with the least restrictive
ways and use licensure only when absolutely necessary.
Illinois lawmakers took a step in the right direction by repealing
the Illinois Athlete Agents Act in 2017, which means people who wish
to work as agents for athletes no longer need a license from the
state to do so.
Where licensure is appropriate, policymakers should guard against
“license creep,” which occurs when the boundaries of professions
expand and rules apply to many practices that can be done by other,
often lower-cost, professionals. Illinois made progress toward
reducing license creep when Gov. Bruce Rauner signed into law an
expansion of practice authority for advanced practice nurses,
allowing these health care professionals to perform more tasks
independent of physicians.
Illinois policymakers should also reconsider rules that keep many
ex-offenders from practicing in given fields. The state took a
significant step forward in this regard in 2016, when Rauner signed
into law a bill to allow people with certain felony convictions to
ask the state for a waiver to apply for a health care worker
license. In 2016, the governor also signed a bill to allow
ex-offenders to apply for licenses to work as barbers, funeral
directors and roofing contractors, among other occupations. Illinois
needs to continue down this path and repeal any rules that
unnecessarily keep former offenders from getting the licenses they
need to earn a living.
Licensure – requiring a government permission slip for someone to
work in his or her chosen field – is a severe form of state-imposed
quality control. Aside from the employment-quashing effects, it is
often an unnecessary method for protecting the public, and is
frequently poorly suited to that end.
Illinois can boost opportunity for more people by overhauling
outdated and ineffective licensing restrictions.
Click here to respond to the editor about this article |