Planning and Zoning re-examines
conditional use in agricultural district for sawmill
Send a link to a friend
[December 12, 2017]
LINCOLN
On
Wednesday, December 6, the Logan County Board's Planning and Zoning
Committee held its monthly meeting. One focus of discussion was a
conditional use request at the former Chestervale Elevator for Baker
and Sons.
At the November Logan County Board meeting, the board had voted to
table the motion to approve the Bakers' request for conditional use
of the elevator property.
At the board workshop, there was discussion of the plans and some
concerns as the board heard from applicants Stephen and Teri Baker
and attorney Blinn Bates.
Blinn Bates of Woods and Bates represents the Baker's neighbor and
has submitted a formal written protest to the application for the
conditional use. His client owns nearby property and is concerned
about the sawmill use, lack of details, no setback lines, and no
guarantees of safety. Bates said the current status of the property
is unacceptable.
Bates said the business has broken down vehicles on it and logs
stacked everywhere on the property are a nuisance. He said there are
dangers involved with a sawmill and a need to protect surrounding
property owners from sawdust catching fire and affecting crops.
Bates requested the board deny the application at this time because
it is lacking in detail with many questions that need answered
before a business of this magnitude can be approved.
At the November 21st board meeting, neighbors expressed concerns
about dangers, noise, and lack of planning.
Logan County Zoning Officer Will D'Andrea said the board could ask
the applicants about the operation.
Stephen and Teri Baker said they have owned the tree service just
under a year since buying it from Stephen's father. Bakers have been
trying to clean up the property and take care of the equipment,
vehicles, and logs. Brush piles on the property are from the storm
this summer.
Teri Baker said the sawmill is in a building, not outside.
Stephen Baker said they have been building the sawmill and trying to
get it set up and establish what to do with logs. Nothing
commercially viable has started around the new operation.
Planning and Zoning Committee Chairman Scott Schaffenacker said they
could amend the application to add more conditional uses if
approving it.
Board member Kevin Bateman wanted more research on conditions.
After tabling the motion, the board voted to send the issue back to
the Planning and Zoning Committee
At the Planning and Zoning Committee meeting, there was more
discussion of conditions.
Committee Chairman Scott Schaffenacker said they needed to look at
the conditional use to allow agriculture business use for a sawmill
in an agricultural zoning district.
Schaffenacker asked the applicants for an update.
Teri Baker said the debris is 90% gone along with most of the
vehicles that were on the property. She had a list of what is plated
and insured and will stay on the property.
Baker said they applied for a burning permit with the EPA, but the
EPA said they are not allowed to burn without a burn curtain. Since
the burn curtain is very expensive, she said they will not do
burning there. Baker said the last time a mill burned was in 2002
and that was due to gross negligence on that owner's part.
[to top of second column] |
Baker said the sawmill is not noisy since it is inside an old
grain bin. The items they will be milling are small.
Bakers have checked prices for eight, ten, and twelve-foot fences at Menards
since they have been asked to put up a fence within twelve months of approval.
The Bakers' neighbor Chad Kern said he just wants to protect his family and have
the neighborhood be a nice, safe atmosphere and the area neat and tidy. Burning
was one of his biggest concerns. He would also like a five-foot setback.
Neighbor Gene Hassebrock said he feels the property is an eyesore right now. He
has concerns about rodents since there were many when the elevator was operating
there.
Baker said they have set out baits, have cats, and have also cleaned out all the
bins to control this problem.
Community Action Executive Director Alison Rumler-Gomez said the Bakers came out
to CAPCIL for consulting. CAPCIL has some economic development dollars that come
from the Department of Commerce and Economic Opportunity that is used with the
Strengthening Working Families' Initiative project.
Rumler-Gomez said Bakers were eligible for SWFI programs and Teri plans to take
the financial literacy class to learn about business planning tactics and
developing business plans. Rumler-Gomez said Teri has followed through on what
was asked and the Bakers are committed to being good business people.
Blinn Bates said the single-family dwelling does not meet the Conditional Use
and needs a variance. Bates provided committee members with his list of
recommendations for special conditions for the Conditional Use. He wants an
engineering design plan, a detailed business proposal, the hours of operation,
debris clean-up, minimum setbacks, no trees or shrubbery planted in the setback
area, and heights for fencing material.
Board Chairman Chuck Ruben asked if the Bakers need a variance for the house.
D'Andrea said a house is already permitted in the agriculturally zoned area.
Bateman said the hours of operation and concerns about the sawmill being inside
an old grain bin are sticking points for him. He does not want them cutting at
9:30 or 10:00 at night. Bateman would like them to have a dust collection system
for all the sawdust since they will probably have doors to the bin open in the
summertime.
Ruben said other businesses have no hour restrictions, though daylight hours
seem reasonable.
Baker said her husband will not work all day long cutting trees and then milling
at night. They plan to do the work during normal business hours. She said a
chute collects the sawdust and they just scoop it up. The sawdust will be
composted in an organic garden.
Schaffenacker said the Cob Plant in Mount Pulaski does not have the restrictions
being asked for. It operates 24 hours and has a lot of dust and noise.
Committee member Emily Davenport asked what recourse there would be if a mess is
still on the property next year.
D'Andrea said it depends on the issue, but the conditional use can be revoked if
conditions are not met.
D'Andrea said the committee should bring the recommendations to the board.
Ruben motioned that they bring forward the amended resolution to the full board
at the board workshop. The board will vote on the amended resolution at the
regular board meeting December 19.
[Angela Reiners] |